Ignore run-make reproducible-build-2 on Mac
Ignore run-make reproducible-build-2 on Mac (we already ignore it on Windows).
Until we can dedicate resources to fixing this properly, I think we are best off just ignoring this test on platforms/contexts where it does not matter as much.
cc #66568
Making ICEs and test them in incremental
This adds:
- A way to make the compiler ICE
- A way to check for ICE in `cfail` tests with `should-ice`
- A regression test for issue #65401
I am not sure the attribute added `should-ice` is the best for this job
Until we can dedicate resources to fixing this properly, I think we are
best off just ignoring this test on platforms/contexts where it does not
matter as much.
Fix#53820
This fixes ICE #53820 by being more clever when matching large arrays with slice patterns.
In particular, it avoids treating large arrays like large tuples, and instead reuses the `VarLenSlice` constructor behaviour to only consider as little values as needed.
As a side-effect, such matches also get improved diagnostics, by reporting `[true, ..]` missing instead of `[true, _, _, _, _, _, _, _]`.
Generic arg disambiguation
Using the tactic suggested by @petrochenkov in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/60804#issuecomment-516769465 and on [zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/generic.20argument.20disambiguation), this change checks type arguments to see if they are really incorrectly-parsed const arguments.
it should be noted that `segments.len() == 1 && segments[0].arg.is_none()` was reduced to `segments.len() == 1` as suggested by @petrochenkov in [zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/generic.20argument.20disambiguation/near/177848002). This change allowed a few more existing tests to have their braces removed.
There are a couple of "problems" with these changes that I should note. First, there was a regression in the error messages found in "src/test/ui/privacy-ns1.rs" and "src/test/ui/privacy-ns1.rs". Second, some braces were unable to be removed from "src/test/ui/const-generics/fn-const-param-infer.rs". Those on line 24 caused the statement to stop equating when removed, and those on line 20 cause a statement that should not equate to produce no error when removed.
I have not looked further into any of these issues yet, though I would be willing to look into them before landing this. I simply wanted to get some other eyes on this before going further.
Fixes#60804
cc @varkor @jplatte
resolve: Give derive helpers highest priority during resolution
So they just shadow everything else and don't create ambiguity errors.
This matches the old pre-#64694 behavior most closely.
---
The change doesn't apply to this "compatibility" case
```rust
#[trait_helper] // The helper attribute is used before it introduced.
// Sadly, compiles on stable, supported via hacks.
// I plan to make a compatibility warning for this.
#[derive(Trait)]
struct S;
```
, such attributes still create ambiguities, but #64694 didn't change anything for this case.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66508
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66525
Fix 'type annotations needed' error with opaque types
Related: #66426
This commit adds handling for opaque types during inference variable
fallback. Type variables generated from the instantiation of opaque
types now fallback to the opaque type itself.
Normally, the type variable for an instantiated opaque type is either
unified with the concrete type, or with the opaque type itself (e.g when
a function returns an opaque type by calling another function).
However, it's possible for the type variable to be left completely
unconstrained. This can occur in code like this:
```rust
pub type Foo = impl Copy;
fn produce() -> Option<Foo> {
None
}
```
Here, we'll instantatiate the `Foo` in `Option<Foo>` to a fresh type
variable, but we will never unify it with anything due to the fact
that we return a `None`.
This results in the error message:
```
type annotations needed: cannot resolve `_: std::marker::Copy
```
pointing at `pub type Foo = impl Copy`.
This message is not only confusing, it's incorrect. When an opaque type
inference variable is completely unconstrained, we can always fall back
to using the opaque type itself. This effectively turns that particular
use of the opaque type into a non-defining use, even if it appears in a
defining scope.
Suggest calling async closure when needed
When using an async closure as a value in a place that expects a future,
suggest calling the closure.
Fix#65923.
Suggest `#[repr(C)]` instead of `#[repr(C, packed, ...)]`
The code was previously suggesting `#[repr(C, packed, ...)]` for incorrect uses of `repr` (e.g. `#[repr = "C"]`). This change suggests the usage of `#[repr(C)]` instead.
r? @estebank
Ref: #61286.
[mir-opt] Turn on the `ConstProp` pass by default
perf.rlo shows that running the `ConstProp` pass results in
across-the-board wins regardless of debug or opt complilation mode. As a
result, we're turning it on to get the compile time benefits.
The error messages of the two tests effected degraded in quality. The
errors no longer suggest types in other modules as they now assume that
the arguments are const args, not type args.
Add outlives suggestions for some lifetime errors
This PR implements suggestion diagnostics for some lifetime mismatch errors. When the borrow checker finds that some lifetime 'a doesn't outlive some other lifetime 'b that it should outlive, then in addition to the current lifetime error, we also emit a suggestion for how to fix the problem by adding a bound:
- If a and b are normal named regions, suggest to add the bound `'a: 'b`
- If b is static, suggest to replace a with static
- If b also needs to outlive a, they must be the same, so suggest unifying them
We start with a simpler implementation that avoids diagnostic regression or implementation complexity:
- We only makes suggestions for lifetimes the user can already name (eg not closure regions or elided regions)
- For now, we only emit a help note, not an actually suggestion because it is significantly easier.
Finally, there is one hack: it seems that implicit regions in async fn are given the name '_ incorrectly. To avoid suggesting '_: 'x, we simply filter out such lifetimes by name.
For more info, see this internals thread:
https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/mechanical-suggestions-for-some-borrow-checker-errors/9049/3
TL;DR Make suggestions to add a `where 'a: 'b` constraint for some lifetime errors. Details are in the paper linked from the internals thread above.
r? @estebank
TODO
- [x] Clean up code
- [x] Only make idiomatic suggestions
- [x] don't suggest naming `&'a self`
- [x] rather than `'a: 'static`, suggest replacing `'a` with `'static`
- [x] rather than `'a: 'b, 'b: 'a`, suggest replacing `'a` with `'b` or vice versa
- [x] Performance (maybe need a perf run when this is closer to the finish line?)
- perf run was clean...
- EDIT: perf run seems to only check non-error performance... How do we check that error performance didn't regress?
- [x] Needs ui tests
- [x] Integrate the `help` message into the main lifetime `error`
Stabilize rustdoc theme options
Closes#54730
This PR stabilizes the `--themes` (now `--theme`) and `--theme-checker` (now `--check-theme`) options, for allowing users to add custom themes to their documentation.
Rustdoc includes two themes by default: `light` and `dark`. Using the `--theme` option, you can give rustdoc a CSS file to include as an extra theme for that render. Themes are named after the CSS file used, so using `--theme /path/to/your/custom-theme.css` will add a theme called `custom-theme` to the documentation.
Even though the CLI flag to add a theme is getting stabilized, there's no guarantee that a theme file will always have the same effect on documentation generated with future versions of rustdoc. To aid in ensuring that a theme will work, the flag `--check-theme` is also available, which compares the CSS rules defined by a custom theme against the ones used in the `light` theme. If the `light` theme defines a CSS rule that the custom theme does not, rustdoc will report an error. (Rustdoc also performs this check for themes given to `--theme`, but only reports a warning when a difference is found.)
Related: #66426
This commit adds handling for opaque types during inference variable
fallback. Type variables generated from the instantiatino of opaque
types now fallback to the opque type itself.
Normally, the type variable for an instantiated opaque type is either
unified with the concrete type, or with the opaque type itself (e.g when
a function returns an opaque type by calling another function).
However, it's possible for the type variable to be left completely
unconstrained. This can occur in code like this:
```rust
pub type Foo = impl Copy;
fn produce() -> Option<Foo> {
None
}
```
Here, we'll instantatiate the `Foo` in `Option<Foo>` to a fresh type
variable, but we will never unify it with anything due to the fact
that we return a `None`.
This results in the error message:
`type annotations needed: cannot resolve `_: std::marker::Copy``
pointing at `pub type Foo = impl Copy`.
This message is not only confusing, it's incorrect. When an opaque type
inference variable is completely unconstrained, we can always fall back
to using the opaque type itself. This effectively turns that particular
use of the opaque type into a non-defining use, even if it appears in a
defining scope.
Make a test compatible across python versions.
Progress on #65063
This PR allows this test to work on both python2 and python3, ~~and it also allows `./x.py test` to fully complete on my system without python2 installed at all.~~
rustdoc: Stabilize `edition` annotation.
The rustdoc `edition` annotation is currently ignored on stable. This means that the tests will be ignored, unless there is a `rust` annotation, then it will use the global edition. I suspect this was just an oversight during the edition stabilization, but I don't know. Example:
```rust
/// ```edition2018
/// // This code block was ignored on stable.
/// ```
/// ```rust,edition2018
/// // This code block would use whatever edition is passed on the command line.
/// ```
```
AFAIK, it is not possible to write a test that verifies stable behavior, as all tests appear to set RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP which forces all tests to run as "nightly", even on a stable release.
Closes#65980
Suggest borrowing when it would satisfy an unmet trait bound
When there are multiple implementors for the same trait that is present
in an unmet binding, modify the E0277 error to refer to the parent
obligation and verify whether borrowing the argument being passed in
would satisfy the unmet bound. If it would, suggest it.
Fix#56368.
Make dataflow-based const qualification the canonical one
For over a month, dataflow-based const qualification has been running in parallel with `qualify_consts` to check the bodies of `const` and `static`s. This PR removes the old qualification pass completely in favor of the dataflow-based one.
**edit:**
This PR also stops checking `QUALIF_ERROR_BIT` during promotion. This check appears to no longer serve a purpose now that the CTFE engine is more robust.
As a side-effect, this resolves#66167.
r? @eddyb
Use "field is never read" instead of "field is never used"
this is my first PR here so please let me know if i am doing it wrong
closes#64465
i will be referencing this with a book PR that updates the same language
Move `DIAGNOSTICS` usage to `rustc_driver`
Remove `rustc_interface`'s dependency on `rustc_error_codes` and centralize all usages of `DIAGNOSTICS` in `rustc_driver`. Once we remove all references to `rustc_error_codes` in all other crates but `rustc_driver`, this should allow for incremental recompilation of the compiler to be smoother when tweaking error codes. This works towards https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66210#issuecomment-551862528.
(May include traces of minor drive-by cleanup.)
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
rustc_plugin: Remove `Registry::register_attribute`
Legacy plugins cannot register inert attributes anymore.
The preferred replacement is to use `register_tool` ([tracking issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66079)).
```rust
#![register_tool(servo)]
#[servo::must_root]
struct S;
```
The more direct replacement is `register_attribute` ([tracking issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66080))
```rust
#![register_attr(must_root)]
#[must_root]
struct S;
```
, but it requires registering each attribute individually rather than registering the tool once, and is more likely to be removed rather than stabilized.
