[nll] add regression test for issue #27868
Adds a test for #27868 ``Inconsistent evaluation order for assignment operations``
apart of #47366 ``tracking issue for bugs fixed by the MIR borrow checker or NLL``
r? @nikomatsakis
Add crate build test for `thumb*` targets. [IRR-2018-embedded]
## Summary
This PR adds `run-make` test that compiles `cortex-m` crate for all supported `thumb*-none-*` targets using `cargo` and stage2 `rustc`.
- Supported `thumb*-none-*` targets:
- thumbv6m-none-eabi (Bare Cortex-M0, M0+, M1)
- thumbv7em-none-eabi (Bare Cortex-M4, M7)
- thumbv7em-none-eabihf (Bare Cortex-M4F, M7F, FPU, hardfloat)
- thumbv7m-none-eabi (Bare Cortex-M3)
## How to run & Example output
I tested locally and all targets succeeded like below:
```
./x.py clean
./x.py test --target thumbv6m-none-eabi,thumbv7em-none-eabi,thumbv7em-none-eabihf,thumbv7m-none-eabi src/test/run-make
```
```
Check compiletest suite=run-make mode=run-make (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> thumbv6m-none-eabi)
running 5 tests
.....
test result: ok. 5 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out
```
## How to re-run
Remove `stamp` file for the test run.
```
rm build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/run-make/thumb-none-cortex-m/stamp
```
Then run `test`
```
./x.py test --target thumbv6m-none-eabi,thumbv7em-none-eabi,thumbv7em-none-eabihf,thumbv7m-none-eabi src/test/run-make
(snip)
running 5 tests
iiii.
test result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 4 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out
```
## Artifacts
You can examine the artifacts under the directory below:
```
sekineh@sekineh-VirtualBox:~/rustme10$ ls -l build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/run-make/thumb-none-cortex-m/thumb-none-cortex-m/
total 4
drwxrwxr-x 7 sekineh sekineh 4096 8月 14 22:40 cortex-m
```
where `build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/run-make/thumb-none-cortex-m/thumb-none-cortex-m/` is came from TMPDIR variable.
## Other notes
For `test.rs` modification, I used the same logic as:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blame/d8b3c830fbcdd14d085209a8dcc3399151f3286a/src/bootstrap/dist.rs#L652-L657
```
if builder.no_std(target) == Some(true) {
// the `test` doesn't compile for no-std targets
builder.ensure(compile::Std { compiler, target });
} else {
builder.ensure(compile::Test { compiler, target });
}
```
It is a useful snippet when adding `no_std` support to `src/bootstrap` code.
CC @kennytm @jamesmunns @nerdyvaishali
rustc_resolve: overhaul `#![feature(uniform_paths)]` error reporting.
Fixes#53408 by only considering external crates to conflict within their (type/module) namespace, *not* with the value or macro namespaces, and also by adding a special-cased error for redundant `use crate_name;` imports (without actually allowing them).
Also, all canaries for a given import are grouped into one diagnostic per namespace, in order to make block-scoped ambiguities clearer.
See changed/added tests for more details.
r? @petrochenkov cc @aturon @joshtriplett
syntax_ext: remove leftover span_err_if_not_stage0 macro.
I believe this is the right fix for #53380, although I'm not sure what happened.
My guess is this copy of the macro was accidentally missed when others were removed?
cc @matthewjasper @varkor (please do not put this in a rollup, in case it fails)
Addressed #51602Fixed#51602
r? @estebank
here I have addressed the case where `in` was not expected right after `if` block. Speaking of `type ascription` I am not sure if this the best approach which I have implemented. Plus I think one more test case can be added to test `type-ascription` case, though I don't have any at this point of time. I will ping you again if all existing testcases pass.
Don't accept non-string literals for the format string in writeln
This is to improve diagnostics.
`println` and `eprintln` were already fixed by #52394.
Fixes#30143
For move errors, suggest match ergonomics instead of `ref`
Partially fixes issue #52423. Also makes errors and suggestions more consistent between move-from-place and move-from-value errors.
Limitations:
- Only the first pattern in a match arm can have a "consider removing this borrow operator" suggestion.
- Suggestions don't always compile as-is (see the TODOs in the test for details).
Sorry for the really long test. I wanted to make sure I handled every case I could think of, and it turned out there were a lot of them.
Questions:
- Is there any particular applicability I should set on those suggestions?
- Are the notes about the `Copy` trait excessive?
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #52453 (improve diagnostics for tests with custom return values)
- #53271 (use ? to simplify `TransitiveRelation.maybe_map`)
- #53279 (Extend documentation of `rustc_on_unimplemented`)
- #53342 (fix error for unsized packed struct field)
- #53344 (Add doc examples for std::alloc::{alloc,alloc_zeroed}.)
- #53368 (Ignore test that fails on stage1)
- #53388 (Fix links' color)
- #53396 (Fix since of Iterator::flatten to be a proper semver)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
fix error for unsized packed struct field
It was really confusing to be told "only the last field of a struct may have a dynamically sized type" when only the last field *was* unsized.
