- The name of an MSRV alias should describe its functionality, and it is
not appropriate for it to be the same as the name of the lint that uses
it.
- Additionally, while `manual_div_ceil` allows setting MSRV, this is not
correctly reflected in the configuration information.
changelog: none
Roses are red,
Biolets are blue,
A typo happened,
too late now
You might be asking,
what are Biolets now?
And to be honest,
I have no clue
---
The cat of this release is `Vera` nominated by @and-reas-se
<img height=500
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/82e6fccc-1f6d-4d29-b6bb-0bd4f3584593"
alt="The cats of this Clippy release" />
Cats for the next release can be nominated in the comments :D
---
changelog: none
fixes#13934
I modified the part for checking if the map is used so that it can check
field and index exprs.
changelog: [`map_entry`]: fix FP on struct member
In the case where `iter` is a `DoubleEndedIterator`, replacing a call to
`iter.last()` (which consumes `iter`) by `iter.next_back()` (which
requires a mutable reference to `iter`) cannot be done when `iter` is a
non-mutable binding which is not a mutable reference. When possible, a
local immutable binding is made into a mutable one.
Also, the applicability is switched to `MaybeIncorrect` and a note is
added to the output when the element types have a significant drop,
because the drop order will potentially be modified because
`.next_back()` does not consume the iterator nor the elements before the
last one.
Fix#14139
changelog: [`double_ended_iterator_last`]: do not trigger on
non-reference immutable receiver, and warn about possible drop order
change
`iter.last()` will drop all elements of `iter` in order, while
`iter.next_back()` will drop the non-last elements of `iter` when
`iter` goes out of scope since `.next_back()` does not consume its
argument.
When the transformation proposed by `double_ended_iterator_last` would
concern an iterator whose element type has a significant drop, a note is
added to warn about the possible drop order change, and the suggestion
is switched from `MachineApplicable` to `MaybeIncorrect`.
In the case where `iter` is a `DoubleEndedIterator`, replacing a call to
`iter.last()` (which consumes `iter`) by `iter.next_back()` (which
requires a mutable reference to `iter`) cannot be done when `iter`
Is not a mutable binding or a mutable reference.
When `iter` is a local binding, it can be made mutable by fixing its
definition site.
Continuing the work started in #136466.
Every method gains a `hir_` prefix, though for the ones that already
have a `par_` or `try_par_` prefix I added the `hir_` after that.
This lint was renamed in 50da77521e.
While I'm here convert the list of separate lints into a proper list for
ease of use and clarify which lints are in clippy and which are in rustc.
First of all, note that `Map` has three different relevant meanings.
- The `intravisit::Map` trait.
- The `map::Map` struct.
- The `NestedFilter::Map` associated type.
The `intravisit::Map` trait is impl'd twice.
- For `!`, where the methods are all unreachable.
- For `map::Map`, which gets HIR stuff from the `TyCtxt`.
As part of getting rid of `map::Map`, this commit changes `impl
intravisit::Map for map::Map` to `impl intravisit::Map for TyCtxt`. It's
fairly straightforward except various things are renamed, because the
existing names would no longer have made sense.
- `trait intravisit::Map` becomes `trait intravisit::HirTyCtxt`, so named
because it gets some HIR stuff from a `TyCtxt`.
- `NestedFilter::Map` assoc type becomes `NestedFilter::MaybeTyCtxt`,
because it's always `!` or `TyCtxt`.
- `Visitor::nested_visit_map` becomes `Visitor::maybe_tcx`.
I deliberately made the new trait and associated type names different to
avoid the old `type Map: Map` situation, which I found confusing. We now
have `type MaybeTyCtxt: HirTyCtxt`.
The end goal is to eliminate `Map` altogether.
I added a `hir_` prefix to all of them, that seemed simplest. The
exceptions are `module_items` which became `hir_module_free_items` because
there was already a `hir_module_items`, and `items` which became
`hir_free_items` for consistency with `hir_module_free_items`.
Fixes#13885.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/14007.
Problem was that I forgot to check whether or not the `span` was a
"real" one. Because if not, then it starts pointing to pretty much only
wrong content, hence the problems we saw with clippy linting on
`clippy.toml`.
changelog: Fix `literal_string_with_formatting_args` lint emitted when
it should not
r? @samueltardieu
valtree performance tuning
Summary: This PR makes type checking of code with many type-level constants faster.
After https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136180 was merged, we observed a small perf regression (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136318#issuecomment-2635562821). This happened because that PR introduced additional copies in the fast reject code path for consts, which is very hot for certain crates: 6c1d960d88/compiler/rustc_type_ir/src/fast_reject.rs (L486-L487)
This PR improves the performance again by properly interning the valtrees so that copying and comparing them becomes faster. This will become especially useful with `feature(adt_const_params)`, so the fast reject code doesn't have to do a deep compare of the valtrees.
Note that we can't just compare the interned consts themselves in the fast reject, because sometimes `'static` lifetimes in the type are be replaced with inference variables (due to canonicalization) on one side but not the other.
A less invasive alternative that I considered is simply avoiding copies introduced by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136180 and comparing the valtrees it in-place (see commit: 9e91e50ac5 / perf results: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136593#issuecomment-2642303245), however that was still measurably slower than interning.
There are some minor regressions in secondary benchmarks: These happen due to changes in memory allocations and seem acceptable to me. The crates that make heavy use of valtrees show no significant changes in memory usage.
Checks for `Read::bytes()` on an unbuffered Read type.
The default implementation calls `read` for each byte, which can be very
inefficient for data that’s not in memory, such as `File`.
Considerations which I'd like to have feedback on:
* Currently this lint triggers when `.bytes()` is called on any type
that implements `std::io::Read` but not `std::io::BufRead`. This is
quite aggressive and in and may result in false positives. Alternatives:
* Only trigger on concrete types, not generic types. This does mean that
cases where a function is generic over a `R: Read` and calls `.bytes()`
are not caught by the lint, which could be quite a nasty case of this
bug.
* Only trigger on an allowlist of stdlib types
* Compromise: Is it possible to make this lint `pedantic` on types that
are not on a allowlist?
* Theoretically, a trait implementation of `Read` could override
`.bytes()` with an efficient implementation. I'm not sure how to add
this check to the lint, and I can't find any cases of this being done in
practice.
* I don't think an automatic fix for this lint is possible, but I'd love
to be proven wrong
* This is my first time contributing to clippy, please let me know if I
did anything wrong
Fixes#14087
```
changelog: [`unbuffered_bytes`]: new lint
```
By default, do not lint `.unwrap()` and `.expect(…)` in always const
contexts, as a failure would be detected at compile time anyway.
New options `allow_expect_in_consts` and `allow_unwrap_in_consts`,
defaulting to `true`, can be turned unset to still lint in always const
contexts.
changelog: [`declare_interior_mutable_const`,
`borrow_interior_mutable_const`]: resolve `<T as Trait>::AssocT`
projections
---
This came up during https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/130543 where
we have `<T as AtomicPrimitive>::Assoc = AtomicT` instead of just
`AtomicT` and clippy failed to resolve that properly.
This really needs a review, because
- I don't know if `try_normalize_erasing_regions` is the right thing to
call here.
- I'm not sure if I peel off the correct amount of `ValTree::Branch`
layers (I think I do).
Also, shouldn't this lint's infrastructure rely on `Freeze` trait
(https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/121675) instead of hardcoding
a list of known-to-be-interior-mutable types?
---
Previously filed this in the main rust repo
(https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136369), was asked to do it here
instead
(https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136369#issuecomment-2628527774).
