Use conditional synchronization for Lock
This changes `Lock` to use synchronization only if `mode::is_dyn_thread_safe` could be true. This reduces overhead for the parallel compiler running with 1 thread.
The emitters are changed to use `DynSend` instead of `Send` so they can still use `Lock`.
A Rayon thread pool is not used with 1 thread anymore, as session globals contains `Lock`s which are no longer `Sync`.
Performance improvement with 1 thread and `cfg(parallel_compiler)`:
<table><tr><td rowspan="2">Benchmark</td><td colspan="1"><b>Before</b></th><td colspan="2"><b>After</b></th></tr><tr><td align="right">Time</td><td align="right">Time</td><td align="right">%</th></tr><tr><td>🟣 <b>clap</b>:check</td><td align="right">1.7665s</td><td align="right">1.7336s</td><td align="right">💚 -1.86%</td></tr><tr><td>🟣 <b>hyper</b>:check</td><td align="right">0.2780s</td><td align="right">0.2736s</td><td align="right">💚 -1.61%</td></tr><tr><td>🟣 <b>regex</b>:check</td><td align="right">0.9994s</td><td align="right">0.9824s</td><td align="right">💚 -1.70%</td></tr><tr><td>🟣 <b>syn</b>:check</td><td align="right">1.5875s</td><td align="right">1.5656s</td><td align="right">💚 -1.38%</td></tr><tr><td>🟣 <b>syntex_syntax</b>:check</td><td align="right">6.0682s</td><td align="right">5.9532s</td><td align="right">💚 -1.90%</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td align="right">10.6997s</td><td align="right">10.5083s</td><td align="right">💚 -1.79%</td></tr><tr><td>Summary</td><td align="right">1.0000s</td><td align="right">0.9831s</td><td align="right">💚 -1.69%</td></tr></table>
cc `@SparrowLii`
Update Clippy
r? `@oli-obk` Assigning you, because something broke with ui_test:
```
tests/ui/crashes/ice-7272.rs FAILED:
command: "<unknown>"
A bug in `ui_test` occurred: called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: Os { code: 2, kind: NotFound, message: "No such file or directory" }
full stderr:
```
(and that 103 times)
Thought I would ping you, before starting to investigate. Maybe you know what's going on.
miri ABI compatibility check: accept u32 and i32
If only the sign differs, then surely these types are compatible. (We do still check that `arg_ext` is the same, just in case.)
Also I made it so that the ABI check must *imply* that size and alignment are the same, but it doesn't actively check that itself. With how crazy ABI constraints get, having equal size and align really shouldn't be used as a signal for anything I think...
tell people what to do when removing an error code
Currently tidy and CI send developers on a wild goose chase:
- you edit the code
- CI/tidy tells you that an error code is gone, so you remove it from the list
- CI/tidy tells you that the markdown file is stale, so you remove that as well
- CI (but not tidy) tells you not to remove an error description and copy what E0001 does
Let's be nice to people and directly tell them what to do rather than making them follow misleading breadcrumbs.
r? ``@GuillaumeGomez``
