borrowck: do not suggest to change "&mut self" to "&mut mut self"
Matching the snippet string might not be the cleanest, but matching
the AST node instead seems to end in a lot of nested `if let`s, so I
don't know what's better.
Of course it's entirely possible that there is another API altogether
that I just don't know of?
Fixes#31424.
resolve: do not modify span of non-importable name
This span modification is probably leftover from a time when import spans were assigned differently.
With this change, error spans for the following are properly reported:
```
use abc::one_el;
use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
use a_very_long_name::{el, el2};
```
before (spans only):
```
x.rs:3 use abc::one_el;
^~~
x.rs:4 use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
^~~
x.rs:4 use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
^~~
x.rs:4 use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
^~~
(internal compiler error: unprintable span)
(internal compiler error: unprintable span)
```
after:
```
x.rs:3 use abc::one_el;
^~~~~~~~~~~
x.rs:4 use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
^
x.rs:4 use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
^~~
x.rs:4 use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
^~~~~~
x.rs:5 use a_very_long_name::{el, el2};
^~
x.rs:5 use a_very_long_name::{el, el2};
^~~
```
Fixes: #33464
This span modification is probably leftover from a time when
import spans were assigned differently.
With this change, error spans for the following are properly reported:
```
use abc::one_el;
use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
use a_very_long_name::{el, el2};
```
before (spans only):
```
x.rs:3 use abc::one_el;
^~~
x.rs:4 use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
^~~
x.rs:4 use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
^~~
x.rs:4 use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
^~~
(internal compiler error: unprintable span)
(internal compiler error: unprintable span)
```
after:
```
x.rs:3 use abc::one_el;
^~~~~~~~~~~
x.rs:4 use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
^
x.rs:4 use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
^~~
x.rs:4 use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
^~~~~~
x.rs:5 use a_very_long_name::{el, el2};
^~
x.rs:5 use a_very_long_name::{el, el2};
^~~
```
Fixes: #33464
Perform name resolution before and during ast->hir lowering
This PR performs name resolution before and during ast->hir lowering instead of in phase 3.
r? @nrc
rustc: Implement custom panic runtimes
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 1513] which allows applications to
alter the behavior of panics at compile time. A new compiler flag, `-C panic`,
is added and accepts the values `unwind` or `panic`, with the default being
`unwind`. This model affects how code is generated for the local crate, skipping
generation of landing pads with `-C panic=abort`.
[RFC 1513]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1513-less-unwinding.md
Panic implementations are then provided by crates tagged with
`#![panic_runtime]` and lazily required by crates with
`#![needs_panic_runtime]`. The panic strategy (`-C panic` value) of the panic
runtime must match the final product, and if the panic strategy is not `abort`
then the entire DAG must have the same panic strategy.
With the `-C panic=abort` strategy, users can expect a stable method to disable
generation of landing pads, improving optimization in niche scenarios,
decreasing compile time, and decreasing output binary size. With the `-C
panic=unwind` strategy users can expect the existing ability to isolate failure
in Rust code from the outside world.
Organizationally, this commit dismantles the `sys_common::unwind` module in
favor of some bits moving part of it to `libpanic_unwind` and the rest into the
`panicking` module in libstd. The custom panic runtime support is pretty similar
to the custom allocator support with the only major difference being how the
panic runtime is injected (takes the `-C panic` flag into account).
Closes#32837
rustdoc: do not strip blanket impls in crate of origin
In `impl<T> Trait for T`, the blanket type parameters `T` were recognized as "local" and "not exported", so these impls were thrown out.
Now we check if they are generic, and keep them in that case.
Fixes: #29503
Add integer atomic types
Tracking issue: #32976
RFC: rust-lang/rfcs#1543
The changes to AtomicBool in the RFC are not included, they are in a separate PR (#32365).
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 1513] which allows applications to
alter the behavior of panics at compile time. A new compiler flag, `-C panic`,
is added and accepts the values `unwind` or `panic`, with the default being
`unwind`. This model affects how code is generated for the local crate, skipping
generation of landing pads with `-C panic=abort`.
[RFC 1513]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1513-less-unwinding.md
Panic implementations are then provided by crates tagged with
`#![panic_runtime]` and lazily required by crates with
`#![needs_panic_runtime]`. The panic strategy (`-C panic` value) of the panic
runtime must match the final product, and if the panic strategy is not `abort`
then the entire DAG must have the same panic strategy.
With the `-C panic=abort` strategy, users can expect a stable method to disable
generation of landing pads, improving optimization in niche scenarios,
decreasing compile time, and decreasing output binary size. With the `-C
panic=unwind` strategy users can expect the existing ability to isolate failure
in Rust code from the outside world.
Organizationally, this commit dismantles the `sys_common::unwind` module in
favor of some bits moving part of it to `libpanic_unwind` and the rest into the
`panicking` module in libstd. The custom panic runtime support is pretty similar
to the custom allocator support with the only major difference being how the
panic runtime is injected (takes the `-C panic` flag into account).
In `impl<T> Trait for T`, the blanket type parameters `T` were
recognized as "local" and "not exported", so these impls were
thrown out.
Now we check if they are generic, and keep them in that case.
Fixes: #29503
trans: callee: normalize trait_ref before use
This fixes#33436 and #33461. Ran the tests and nothing else seems to be affected.
P.S. How to write the regression test for this fix? Does this qualify as run-pass or run-make, as the test only needs to be successfully compiled to be considered passed? Will add the testcase (the minimal example in #33461 seems fit) after clarifying this.
Improve diagnostics for constants being used in irrefutable patterns
It's pretty confusing and this error triggers in resolve only when "shadowing" a const, so let's make that clearer.
r? @steveklabnik
Implement constant support in MIR.
All of the intended features in `trans::consts` are now supported by `mir::constant`.
The implementation is considered a temporary measure until `miri` replaces it.
A `-Z orbit` bootstrap build will only translate LLVM IR from AST for `#[rustc_no_mir]` functions.
Furthermore, almost all checks of constant expressions have been moved to MIR.
In non-`const` functions, trees of temporaries are promoted, as per RFC 1414 (rvalue promotion).
Promotion before MIR borrowck would allow reasoning about promoted values' lifetimes.
The improved checking comes at the cost of four `[breaking-change]`s:
* repeat counts must contain a constant expression, e.g.:
`let arr = [0; { println!("foo"); 5 }];` used to be allowed (it behaved like `let arr = [0; 5];`)
* dereference of a reference to a `static` cannot be used in another `static`, e.g.:
`static X: [u8; 1] = [1]; static Y: u8 = (&X)[0];` was unintentionally allowed before
* the type of a `static` *must* be `Sync`, irrespective of the initializer, e.g.
`static FOO: *const T = &BAR;` worked as `&T` is `Sync`, but it shouldn't because `*const T` isn't
* a `static` cannot wrap `UnsafeCell` around a type that *may* need drop, e.g.
`static X: MakeSync<UnsafeCell<Option<String>>> = MakeSync(UnsafeCell::new(None));`
was previously allowed based on the fact `None` alone doesn't need drop, but in `UnsafeCell`
it can be later changed to `Some(String)` which *does* need dropping
The drop restrictions are relaxed by RFC 1440 (#33156), which is implemented, but feature-gated.
However, creating `UnsafeCell` from constants is unstable, so users can just enable the feature gate.
parser: do not try to continue with `unsafe` on foreign fns
The changed line makes it look like `unsafe` is allowed, but the first statement of `parse_item_foreign_fn` is:
```
self.expect_keyword(keywords::Fn)?;
```
So we get the strange "expected one of `fn`, `pub`, `static`, or `unsafe`, found `unsafe`".
Fixes: #27361
parser: fix suppression of syntax errors in range RHS
Invalid expressions on the RHS were just swallowed without generating an error. The new version more closely mirrors the code for parsing `..x` in the `parse_prefix_range_expr` method below, where no cancel is done either.
Fixes#33262.
Instead of finding aux-build files in `auxiliary`, we now search for an
`aux` directory relative to the test. So if your test is
`compile-fail/foo.rs`, we would look in `compile-fail/aux`. Similarly,
we ignore the `aux` directory when searching for tets.
debuginfo: Fix regression in namespace handling for struct types.
Fixes a small regression that has been introduced in recent refactorings.
Fixes#33193
r? @eddyb
Short-cut `T: Sized` trait selection for ADTs
Basically avoids all nested obligations when checking whether an ADT is sized - this speeds up typeck by ~15%
The refactoring fixed#32963, but I also want to make `Copy` not object-safe (will commit that soon).
Fixes#33201
r? @nikomatsakis
