If we have a cause containing `ValuePairs::PolyTraitRefs` but neither
TraitRef has any escaping bound regions then we report the same error as
for `ValuePairs::TraitRefs`.
Fix derived PartialOrd operators
The derived implementation of `partial_cmp` compares matching fields one
by one, stopping the computation when the result of a comparison is not
equal to `Some(Equal)`.
On the other hand the derived implementation for `lt`, `le`, `gt` and
`ge` continues the computation when the result of a field comparison is
`None`, consequently those operators are not transitive and inconsistent
with `partial_cmp`.
Fix the inconsistency by using the default implementation that fall-backs
to the `partial_cmp`. This also avoids creating very deeply nested
closures that were quite costly to compile.
Fixes#81373.
Helps with #81278, #80118.
Allow Trait inheritance with cycles on associated types take 2
This reverts the revert of #79209 and fixes the ICEs that's occasioned by that PR exposing some problems that are addressed in #80648 and #79811.
For easier review I'd say, check only the last commit, the first one is just a revert of the revert of #79209 which was already approved.
This also could be considered part or the actual fix of #79560 but I guess for that to be closed and fixed completely we would need to land #80648 and #79811 too.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
cc `@Aaron1011`
parse_format: treat r" as a literal
This PR changes `format_args!` internal parsing machinery to treat raw strings starting `r"` as a literal.
Currently `"` and `r#` are recognised as valid starting combinations for string literals, but `r"` is not.
This was noticed when debugging https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/67984#issuecomment-753413156
As well as fixing the behavior observed in that comment, this improves diagnostic spans for `r"` formatting strings.
Improve SIMD type element count validation
Resolvesrust-lang/stdsimd#53.
These changes are motivated by `stdsimd` moving in the direction of const generic vectors, e.g.:
```rust
#[repr(simd)]
struct SimdF32<const N: usize>([f32; N]);
```
This makes a few changes:
* Establishes a maximum SIMD lane count of 2^16 (65536). This value is arbitrary, but attempts to validate lane count before hitting potential errors in the backend. It's not clear what LLVM's maximum lane count is, but cranelift's appears to be much less than `usize::MAX`, at least.
* Expands some SIMD intrinsics to support arbitrary lane counts. This resolves the ICE in the linked issue.
* Attempts to catch invalid-sized vectors during typeck when possible.
Unresolved questions:
* Generic-length vectors can't be validated in typeck and are only validated after monomorphization while computing layout. This "works", but the errors simply bail out with no context beyond the name of the type. Should these errors instead return `LayoutError` or otherwise provide context in some way? As it stands, users of `stdsimd` could trivially produce monomorphization errors by making zero-length vectors.
cc `@bjorn3`
expand/resolve: Turn `#[derive]` into a regular macro attribute
This PR turns `#[derive]` into a regular attribute macro declared in libcore and defined in `rustc_builtin_macros`, like it was previously done with other "active" attributes in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/62086, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/62735 and other PRs.
This PR is also a continuation of #65252, #69870 and other PRs linked from them, which layed the ground for converting `#[derive]` specifically.
`#[derive]` still asks `rustc_resolve` to resolve paths inside `derive(...)`, and `rustc_expand` gets those resolution results through some backdoor (which I'll try to address later), but otherwise `#[derive]` is treated as any other macro attributes, which simplifies the resolution-expansion infra pretty significantly.
The change has several observable effects on language and library.
Some of the language changes are **feature-gated** by [`feature(macro_attributes_in_derive_output)`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81119).
#### Library
- `derive` is now available through standard library as `{core,std}::prelude::v1::derive`.
#### Language
- `derive` now goes through name resolution, so it can now be renamed - `use derive as my_derive; #[my_derive(Debug)] struct S;`.
- `derive` now goes through name resolution, so this resolution can fail in corner cases. Crater found one such regression, where import `use foo as derive` goes into a cycle with `#[derive(Something)]`.
- **[feature-gated]** `#[derive]` is now expanded as any other attributes in left-to-right order. This allows to remove the restriction on other macro attributes following `#[derive]` (https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues/566). The following macro attributes become a part of the derive's input (this is not a change, non-macro attributes following `#[derive]` were treated in the same way previously).
- `#[derive]` is now expanded as any other attributes in left-to-right order. This means two derive attributes `#[derive(Foo)] #[derive(Bar)]` are now expanded separately rather than together. It doesn't generally make difference, except for esoteric cases. For example `#[derive(Foo)]` can now produce an import bringing `Bar` into scope, but previously both `Foo` and `Bar` were required to be resolved before expanding any of them.
- **[feature-gated]** `#[derive()]` (with empty list in parentheses) actually becomes useful. For historical reasons `#[derive]` *fully configures* its input, eagerly evaluating `cfg` everywhere in its target, for example on fields.
Expansion infra doesn't do that for other attributes, but now when macro attributes attributes are allowed to be written after `#[derive]`, it means that derive can *fully configure* items for them.
```rust
#[derive()]
#[my_attr]
struct S {
#[cfg(FALSE)] // this field in removed by `#[derive()]` and not observed by `#[my_attr]`
field: u8
}
```
- `#[derive]` on some non-item targets is now prohibited. This was accidentally allowed as noop in the past, but was warned about since early 2018 (#50092), despite that crater found a few such cases in unmaintained crates.
- Derive helper attributes used before their introduction are now reported with a deprecation lint. This change is long overdue (since macro modularization, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52226#issuecomment-422605033), but it was hard to do without fixing expansion order for derives. The deprecation is tracked by #79202.
```rust
#[trait_helper] // warning: derive helper attribute is used before it is introduced
#[derive(Trait)]
struct S {}
```
Crater analysis: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79078#issuecomment-731436821
Add test for #75158
This also shifts some type-size related tests into a new directory, so that we keep the number of files at the root down.
Closes#75158
And tuple variant syntax, but that didn't fit in the subject :)
Now the fact that these are suggestions is exposed both to the layout
engine and to IDEs and rustfix for automatic application.
Make hitting the recursion limit in projection non-fatal
This change was originally made in #80246 to avoid future (effectively) infinite loop bugs in projections,
but wundergraph relies on rustc recovering here.
cc #80953
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Avoid describing a method as 'not found' when bounds are unsatisfied
Fixes#76267
When there is a single applicable method candidate, but its trait bounds
are not satisfied, we avoid saying that the method is "not found".
Insted, we update the error message to directly mention which bounds are
not satisfied, rather than mentioning them in a note.
Fixes#76267
When there is a single applicable method candidate, but its trait bounds
are not satisfied, we avoid saying that the method is "not found".
Insted, we update the error message to directly mention which bounds are
not satisfied, rather than mentioning them in a note.
Improve diagnostics when parsing angle args
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79266 introduced parsing of generic arguments in associated type constraints, this however resulted in possibly very confusing error messages in cases in which closing angle brackets were missing such as in `Vec<(u32, _, _) = vec![]`, which outputs an incorrectly parsed equality constraint error, as noted by `@cynecx.`
This PR tries to provide better error messages in such cases.
r? `@petrochenkov`
Rework diagnostics for wrong number of generic args (fixes#66228 and #71924)
This PR reworks the `wrong number of {} arguments` message, so that it provides more details and contextual hints.
For example, this code:
struct S(i32, f32);
let S(x) = S(0, 1.0);
will make the compiler suggest either:
let S(x, _) = S(0, 1.0);
or:
let S(x, ..) = S(0, 1.0);
