Split out statement attributes changes from #78306
This is the same as PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/78306, but `unused_doc_comments` is modified to explicitly ignore statement items (which preserves the current behavior).
This shouldn't have any user-visible effects, so it can be landed without lang team discussion.
---------
When the 'early' and 'late' visitors visit an attribute target, they
activate any lint attributes (e.g. `#[allow]`) that apply to it.
This can affect warnings emitted on sibiling attributes. For example,
the following code does not produce an `unused_attributes` for
`#[inline]`, since the sibiling `#[allow(unused_attributes)]` suppressed
the warning.
```rust
trait Foo {
#[allow(unused_attributes)] #[inline] fn first();
#[inline] #[allow(unused_attributes)] fn second();
}
```
However, we do not do this for statements - instead, the lint attributes
only become active when we visit the struct nested inside `StmtKind`
(e.g. `Item`).
Currently, this is difficult to observe due to another issue - the
`HasAttrs` impl for `StmtKind` ignores attributes for `StmtKind::Item`.
As a result, the `unused_doc_comments` lint will never see attributes on
item statements.
This commit makes two interrelated fixes to the handling of inert
(non-proc-macro) attributes on statements:
* The `HasAttr` impl for `StmtKind` now returns attributes for
`StmtKind::Item`, treating it just like every other `StmtKind`
variant. The only place relying on the old behavior was macro
which has been updated to explicitly ignore attributes on item
statements. This allows the `unused_doc_comments` lint to fire for
item statements.
* The `early` and `late` lint visitors now activate lint attributes when
invoking the callback for `Stmt`. This ensures that a lint
attribute (e.g. `#[allow(unused_doc_comments)]`) can be applied to
sibiling attributes on an item statement.
For now, the `unused_doc_comments` lint is explicitly disabled on item
statements, which preserves the current behavior. The exact locatiosn
where this lint should fire are being discussed in PR #78306
When the 'early' and 'late' visitors visit an attribute target, they
activate any lint attributes (e.g. `#[allow]`) that apply to it.
This can affect warnings emitted on sibiling attributes. For example,
the following code does not produce an `unused_attributes` for
`#[inline]`, since the sibiling `#[allow(unused_attributes)]` suppressed
the warning.
```rust
trait Foo {
#[allow(unused_attributes)] #[inline] fn first();
#[inline] #[allow(unused_attributes)] fn second();
}
```
However, we do not do this for statements - instead, the lint attributes
only become active when we visit the struct nested inside `StmtKind`
(e.g. `Item`).
Currently, this is difficult to observe due to another issue - the
`HasAttrs` impl for `StmtKind` ignores attributes for `StmtKind::Item`.
As a result, the `unused_doc_comments` lint will never see attributes on
item statements.
This commit makes two interrelated fixes to the handling of inert
(non-proc-macro) attributes on statements:
* The `HasAttr` impl for `StmtKind` now returns attributes for
`StmtKind::Item`, treating it just like every other `StmtKind`
variant. The only place relying on the old behavior was macro
which has been updated to explicitly ignore attributes on item
statements. This allows the `unused_doc_comments` lint to fire for
item statements.
* The `early` and `late` lint visitors now activate lint attributes when
invoking the callback for `Stmt`. This ensures that a lint
attribute (e.g. `#[allow(unused_doc_comments)]`) can be applied to
sibiling attributes on an item statement.
For now, the `unused_doc_comments` lint is explicitly disabled on item
statements, which preserves the current behavior. The exact locatiosn
where this lint should fire are being discussed in PR #78306
BTreeMap: refactor Entry out of map.rs into its own file
btree/map.rs is approaching the 3000 line mark, splitting out the entry
code buys about 500 lines of headroom.
I've created this PR because the changes I've made in #77438 will push `map.rs` over the 3000 line limit and cause tidy to complain.
I picked `Entry` to factor out because it feels less tightly coupled to the rest of `BTreeMap` than the various iterator implementations.
Related: #60302
Modify executable checking to be more universal
This uses a dummy file to check if the filesystem being used supports the executable bit in general.
Supersedes #74753.
Deny broken intra-doc links in linkchecker
Since rustdoc isn't warning about these links, check for them manually.
This also fixes the broken links that popped up from the lint.
No more target.target
Two main changes of this PR:
* Turn `target_pointer_width` into an integer and rename to `pointer_width`.
The compiler only allowed three valid values for the width anyways.
An integer is more natural for this value, and saves a few allocations
and copies.
* Remove the `rustc_session::config::Config` wrapper and replace it with
its inner member `Target`. Aka. no more `target.target`. This makes life so
much easier, but it also causes a ton of downstream breakage.
Some changes of this PR were done using tooling. These tooling-made changes
were isolated to their own commits to make review easier.
It's best to review the PR commit-by-commit.
Miri PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/pull/1583
I request p=10 bors priority because of the breakage.
The wrapper type led to tons of target.target
across the compiler. Its ptr_width field isn't
required any more, as target_pointer_width
is already present in parsed form.
Dist build manifest
This PR makes two changes that should remove a significant chunk of the time spent in our release process: cloning the `rust-lang/rust` monorepo, all its submodules, and building `bootstrap` to then invoke `build-manifest`:
* `build-manifest` doesn't rely on a clone of the monorepo being present anymore. The only remaining bit of information it fetched from it (the Rust version) is instead bundled in the binary.
* A new "component" is added, `build-manifest`. That component includes a prebuilt version of the tool, and it's *not* included in the Rustup manifest. This will allow `promote-release` to directly invoke the tool without interacting with our build system.
* The Linux x86_64 CI is changed to also build the component mentioned above. It's the only CI builder tasked to do so, and to cleanly support this a new `--include-default-paths` flag was added to `./x.py`.
* The `BUILD_MANIFEST_NUM_THREADS` environment variable is added to configure the number of threads at runtime.
This PR is best reviewed commit-by-commit.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
This commit changes the way build-manifest is invoked, to let it accept
the Rust version directly instead of requiring the path of the Rust
monorepo and letting build-manifest figure out the path on its own.
This allows to run build-manifest without a clone of the monorepo.
Always use the Rust version in package names
The format of the tarballs produced by CI is roughly the following:
{component}-{release}-{target}.{ext}
While on the beta and nightly channels `{release}` is just the channel name, on the stable channel is either the Rust version or the version of the component we're shipping:
cargo-0.47.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz
clippy-0.0.212-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz
llvm-tools-1.46.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz
miri-0.1.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz
rls-1.41.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz
rust-1.46.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz
...
This makes it really hard to get the package URL without having access to the manifest (and there is no manifest on ci-artifacts.rlo), as there is no consistent version number to use.
This PR addresses the problem by always using the Rust version number as `{release}` for the stable channel, regardless of the version number of the component we're shipping. I chose that instead of "stable" to avoid breaking the URL scheme *that* much.
Rustup should not be affected by this change, as it fetches the URLs from the manifest. Unfortunately we don't have a way to test other clients before making a stable release, as this change only affects the stable channel.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
The format of the tarballs produced by CI is roughly the following:
{component}-{release}-{target}.{ext}
While on the beta and nightly channels `{release}` is just the channel
name, on the stable channel is either the Rust version or the version of
the component we're shipping:
cargo-0.47.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz
clippy-0.0.212-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz
llvm-tools-1.46.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz
miri-0.1.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz
rls-1.41.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz
rust-1.46.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz
...
This makes it really hard to get the package URL without having access
to the manifest (and there is no manifest on ci-artifacts.rlo), as there
is no consistent version number to use.
This commit addresses the problem by always using the Rust version
number as `{release}` for the stable channel, regardless of the version
number of the component we're shipping. I chose that instead of "stable"
to avoid breaking the URL scheme *that* much.
Rustup should not be affected by this change, as it fetches the URLs
from the manifest. Unfortunately we don't have a way to test other
clients before making a stable release, as this change only affects the
stable channel.
