skip dyn keyword lint under macros
This PR is following my own intuition that `rustfix` should never inject bugs into working code (even if that comes at the expense of it failing to fix things that will become bugs).
Fix#56327
Fix invalid DWARF for enums when using ThinLTO
We were setting the same identifier for both the DW_TAG_structure_type
and the DW_TAG_variant_part. This becomes a problem when using ThinLTO
becauses it uses the identifier as a key for a map of types that is used
to delete duplicates based on the ODR, so one of them is deleted as a
duplicate, resulting in invalid DWARF.
The DW_TAG_variant_part isn't a standalone type, so it doesn't need
an identifier. Fix by omitting its identifier.
ODR uniquing is [enabled here](f21dee2c61/src/rustllvm/PassWrapper.cpp (L1101)).
Whitelist some rustc attrs
These rustc attrs are used within libcore, and were causing failures when one mixed incremental compilation with bootstrapping (due to a default of `-D warnings` when bootstrapping).
Fix#59523Fix#59524
Cc #58633
This commit removes the check that disallows the `#[non_exhaustive]`
attribute from being placed on enum variants and removes the associated
tests.
Further, this commit lowers the visibility of enum variant constructors
when the variant is marked as non-exhaustive.
Review feedback asked for the test to be generalized to include macros
2.0; that generalization is dyn-2015-idents-in-decl-macros-unlinted.rs
As a drive-by, I also decided to revise the test to make it clear
*why* we cannot generally lint these cases. (I already had similar
demonstrations in dyn-2015-edition-keyword-ident-lint.rs, but it does
not hurt to try to emphasize matters.)
I also added some commentary on the cases where we could choose to
make the lint smarter, namely the situations where a macro is
*definitely* using `dyn` as an identifier (because it is using it as a
path component).
Back-story: After reflection this morning, I realized that the
previous form of this test would allow the macro invocation to treat
the `dyn` input as a raw-identifier rather than a keyword, and since
the input was discarded by that version of the macro, the test would
pass despite the detail that the input `dyn` should not have been
parsed as a raw-identifier.
This revision fixes that oversight, by actually *using* the macro
input to construct a `Box<dyn Trait>` type.
Do not complain about unmentioned fields in recovered patterns
When the parser has to recover from malformed code in a pattern, do not
complain about missing fields.
Fix#59145.
fs::copy() unix: set file mode early
A convenience method like fs::copy() should try to prevent pitfalls a
normal user doesn't think about.
In case of an empty umask, setting the file mode early prevents
temporarily world readable or even writeable files,
because the default mode is 0o666.
In case the target is a named pipe or special device node, setting the
file mode can lead to unwanted side effects, like setting permissons on
`/dev/stdout` or for root setting permissions on `/dev/null`.
copy_file_range() returns EINVAL, if the destination is a FIFO/pipe or
a device like "/dev/null", so fallback to io::copy, too.
Fixes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/26933
Fixed: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/37885
When two multiline span labels point at the same span, we special
case the output to avoid weird behavior:
```
foo(
_____^
|_____|
|| bar,
|| );
|| ^
||______|
|______foo
baz
```
instead showing
```
foo(
_____^
| bar,
| );
| ^
| |
|______foo
baz
```
Generalize diagnostic for `x = y` where `bool` is the expected type
Extracted out of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/59288.
Currently we special case a diagnostic for `if x = y { ...` since the expected type is `bool` in this case and we instead suggest `if x == y`. This PR generalizes this such that given an expression of form `x = y` (`ExprKind::Assign(..)`) where the expected type is `bool`, we emit a suggestion `x == y`.
r? @oli-obk
Let's do a perf run to make sure this was not the source of regressions in #59288.
