For a rigid projection, recursively look at the self type's item bounds to fix the `associated_type_bounds` feature
Given a deeply nested rigid projection like `<<<T as Trait1>::Assoc1 as Trait2>::Assoc2 as Trait3>::Assoc3`, this PR adjusts both trait solvers to look at the item bounds for all of `Assoc3`, `Assoc2`, and `Assoc1` in order to satisfy a goal. We do this because the item bounds for projections may contain relevant bounds for *other* nested projections when the `associated_type_bounds` (ATB) feature is enabled. For example:
```rust
#![feature(associated_type_bounds)]
trait Trait1 {
type Assoc1: Trait2<Assoc2: Foo>;
// Item bounds for `Assoc1` are:
// `<Self as Trait1>::Assoc1: Trait2`
// `<<Self as Trait1>::Assoc1 as Trait2>::Assoc2: Foo`
}
trait Trait2 {
type Assoc2;
}
trait Foo {}
fn hello<T: Trait1>(x: <<T as Trait1>::Assoc1 as Trait2>::Assoc2) {
fn is_foo(_: impl Foo) {}
is_foo(x);
// Currently fails with:
// ERROR the trait bound `<<Self as Trait1>::Assoc1 as Trait2>::Assoc2: Foo` is not satisfied
}
```
This has been a long-standing place of brokenness for ATBs, and is also part of the reason why ATBs currently desugar so differently in various positions (i.e. sometimes desugaring to param-env bounds, sometimes desugaring to RPITs, etc). For example, in RPIT and TAIT position, `impl Foo<Bar: Baz>` currently desugars to `impl Foo<Bar = impl Baz>` because we do not currently take advantage of these nested item bounds if we desugared them into a single set of item bounds on the opaque. This is obviously both strange and unnecessary if we just take advantage of these bounds as we should.
## Approach
This PR repeatedly peels off each projection of a given goal's self type and tries to match its item bounds against a goal, repeating with the self type of the projection. This is pretty straightforward to implement in the new solver, only requiring us to loop on the self type of a rigid projection to discover inner rigid projections, and we also need to introduce an extra probe so we can normalize them.
In the old solver, we can do essentially the same thing, however we rely on the fact that projections *should* be normalized already. This is obviously not always the case -- however, in the case that they are not fully normalized, such as a projection which has both infer vars and, we bail out with ambiguity if we hit an infer var for the self type.
## Caveats
⚠️ In the old solver, this has the side-effect of actually stalling some higher-ranked trait goals of the form `for<'a> <?0 as Tr<'a>>: Tr2`. Because we stall them, they no longer are eagerly treated as error -- this cause some existing `known-bug` tests to go from fail -> pass.
I'm pretty unconvinced that this is a problem since we make code that we expect to pass in the *new* solver also pass in the *old* solver, though this obviously doesn't solve the *full* problem.
## And then also...
We also adjust the desugaring of ATB to always desugar to a regular associated bound, rather than sometimes to an impl Trait **except** for when the ATB is present in a `dyn Trait`. We need to lower `dyn Trait<Assoc: Bar>` to `dyn Trait<Assoc = impl Bar>` because object types need all of their associated types specified.
I would also be in favor of splitting out the ATB feature and/or removing support for object types in order to stabilize just the set of positions for which the ATB feature is consistent (i.e. always elaborates to a bound).
Build DebugInfo for async closures
The test is pretty bare, because I don't really know how to write debuginfo tests. I'd like to land this first, and then flesh it out correctly one it's no longer ICEing on master (which breaks people's ability to test using async closures).
r? oli-obk cc `@rust-lang/wg-debugging` (if any of y'all want to help me write a more fleshed out async closures test)
Emit more specific diagnostics when enums fail to cast with `as`
Fixes#120756
Changes this diagnostic reported in the issue:
```
error[E0605]: non-primitive cast: `Bad` as `u32`
--> src/main.rs:18:10
|
18 | dbg!(bad as u32);
| ^^^^^^^^^^ an `as` expression can only be used to convert between primitive types or to coerce to a specific trait object
```
to this:
```
error[E0605]: non-primitive cast: `Bad` as `u32`
--> src/main.rs:18:10
|
18 | dbg!(bad as u32);
| ^^^^^^^^^^ an `as` expression can be used to convert enum types to numeric types only if the enum type is unit-only or field-less
|
= note: see https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/enumerations.html#casting for more information
```
This change is only for enums. The diagnostic remains unchanged for all other cases.
improve normalization of `Pointee::Metadata`
This PR makes it so that `<Wrapper<Tail> as Pointee>::Metadata` is normalized to `<Tail as Pointee>::Metadata` if we don't know `Wrapper<Tail>: Sized`. With that, the trait solver can prove projection predicates like `<Wrapper<Tail> as Pointee>::Metadata == <Tail as Pointee>::Metadata`, which makes it possible to use the metadata APIs to cast between the tail and the wrapper:
```rust
#![feature(ptr_metadata)]
use std::ptr::{self, Pointee};
fn cast_same_meta<T: ?Sized, U: ?Sized>(ptr: *const T) -> *const U
where
T: Pointee<Metadata = <U as Pointee>::Metadata>,
{
let (thin, meta) = ptr.to_raw_parts();
ptr::from_raw_parts(thin, meta)
}
struct Wrapper<T: ?Sized>(T);
fn cast_to_wrapper<T: ?Sized>(ptr: *const T) -> *const Wrapper<T> {
cast_same_meta(ptr)
}
```
Previously, this failed to compile:
```
error[E0271]: type mismatch resolving `<Wrapper<T> as Pointee>::Metadata == <T as Pointee>::Metadata`
--> src/lib.rs:16:5
|
15 | fn cast_to_wrapper<T: ?Sized>(ptr: *const T) -> *const Wrapper<T> {
| - found this type parameter
16 | cast_same_meta(ptr)
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected `Wrapper<T>`, found type parameter `T`
|
= note: expected associated type `<Wrapper<T> as Pointee>::Metadata`
found associated type `<T as Pointee>::Metadata`
= note: an associated type was expected, but a different one was found
```
(Yes, you can already do this with `as` casts. But using functions is so much ✨ *safer* ✨, because you can't change the metadata on accident.)
---
This PR essentially changes the built-in impls of `Pointee` from this:
```rust
// before
impl Pointee for u8 {
type Metadata = ();
}
impl Pointee for [u8] {
type Metadata = usize;
}
// ...
impl Pointee for Wrapper<u8> {
type Metadata = ();
}
impl Pointee for Wrapper<[u8]> {
type Metadata = usize;
}
// ...
// This impl is only selected if `T` is a type parameter or unnormalizable projection or opaque type.
fallback impl<T: ?Sized> Pointee for Wrapper<T>
where
Wrapper<T>: Sized
{
type Metadata = ();
}
// This impl is only selected if `T` is a type parameter or unnormalizable projection or opaque type.
fallback impl<T /*: Sized */> Pointee for T {
type Metadata = ();
}
```
to this:
```rust
// after
impl Pointee for u8 {
type Metadata = ();
}
impl Pointee for [u8] {
type Metadata = usize;
}
// ...
impl<T: ?Sized> Pointee for Wrapper<T> {
// in the old solver this will instead project to the "deep" tail directly,
// e.g. `Wrapper<Wrapper<T>>::Metadata = T::Metadata`
type Metadata = <T as Pointee>::Metadata;
}
// ...
// This impl is only selected if `T` is a type parameter or unnormalizable projection or opaque type.
fallback impl<T /*: Sized */> Pointee for T {
type Metadata = ();
}
```
Fix more `ty::Error` ICEs in MIR passes
Fixes#120791 - Add a check for `ty::Error` in the `ByMove` coroutine pass
Fixes#120816 - Add a check for `ty::Error` in the MIR validator
Also a drive-by fix for a FIXME I had asked oli to add
r? oli-obk
Make privacy visitor use types more (instead of HIR)
r? ``@petrochenkov``
This is a prerequisite to normalizing projections, as otherwise we have too many invalid bound vars (hir_ty_to_ty is creating types that have bound vars, but no binder).
The commits are still chaotic, I'm gonna clean them up, but I just wanted to let you know about the general direction and wondering if we could land this before adding normalization, as normalization is where behavioral changes happen, and I'd like to keep that part as minimal as possible.
[context can be found on zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/315482-t-compiler.2Fetc.2Fopaque-types/topic/weak.20type.20aliases.20and.20privacy)
Toggle assert_unsafe_precondition in codegen instead of expansion
The goal of this PR is to make some of the unsafe precondition checks in the standard library available in debug builds. Some UI tests are included to verify that it does that.
The diff is large, but most of it is blessing mir-opt tests and I've also split up this PR so it can be reviewed commit-by-commit.
This PR:
1. Adds a new intrinsic, `debug_assertions` which is lowered to a new MIR NullOp, and only to a constant after monomorphization
2. Rewrites `assume_unsafe_precondition` to check the new intrinsic, and be monomorphic.
3. Skips codegen of the `assume` intrinsic in unoptimized builds, because that was silly before but with these checks it's *very* silly
4. The checks with the most overhead are `ptr::read`/`ptr::write` and `NonNull::new_unchecked`. I've simply added `#[cfg(debug_assertions)]` to the checks for `ptr::read`/`ptr::write` because I was unable to come up with any (good) ideas for decreasing their impact. But for `NonNull::new_unchecked` I found that the majority of callers can use a different function, often a safe one.
Yes, this PR slows down the compile time of some programs. But in our benchmark suite it's never more than 1% icount, and the average icount change in debug-full programs is 0.22%. I think that is acceptable for such an improvement in developer experience.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120539#issuecomment-1922687101
Make `min_exhaustive_patterns` match `exhaustive_patterns` better
Split off from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120742.
There remained two edge cases where `min_exhaustive_patterns` wasn't behaving like `exhaustive_patterns`. This fixes them, and tests the feature in a bunch more cases. I essentially went through all uses of `exhaustive_patterns` to see which ones would be interesting to compare between the two features.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #119592 (resolve: Unload speculatively resolved crates before freezing cstore)
- #120103 (Make it so that async-fn-in-trait is compatible with a concrete future in implementation)
- #120206 (hir: Make sure all `HirId`s have corresponding HIR `Node`s)
- #120214 (match lowering: consistently lower bindings deepest-first)
- #120688 (GVN: also turn moves into copies with projections)
- #120702 (docs: also check the inline stmt during redundant link check)
- #120727 (exhaustiveness: Prefer "`0..MAX` not covered" to "`_` not covered")
- #120734 (Add `SubdiagnosticMessageOp` as a trait alias.)
- #120739 (improve pretty printing for associated items in trait objects)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
improve pretty printing for associated items in trait objects
* Don't print a binder in front of associated items, because it's not valid syntax.
* e.g. print `dyn for<'a> Trait<'a, Assoc = &'a u8>` instead of `dyn for<'a> Trait<'a, for<'a> Assoc = &'a u8>`.
* Don't print associated items that are implied by a supertrait bound.
* e.g. if we have `trait Sub: Super<Assoc = u8> {}`, then just print `dyn Sub` instead of `dyn Sub<Assoc = u8>`.
I've added the test in the first commit, so you can see the diff of the compiler output in the second commit.
exhaustiveness: Prefer "`0..MAX` not covered" to "`_` not covered"
There was an exception when reporting integer ranges as missing, it's been there for as long as I can remember. This PR removes it. I think it's nicer to report "`0..MAX` not covered" than "`_` not covered". This also makes it consistent with enums, where we report individual enum variants in this case (as showcased in the rest of the `empty-match.rs` test).
r? ``@estebank``
docs: also check the inline stmt during redundant link check
Fixes#120444
This issue was brought about by querying `root::webdavfs::A`, a key that doesn't exist in `doc_link_resolutions`. To avoid a panic, I've altered the gating mechanism to allow this lint pass to be skipped.
I'm not certain if this is the best solution. An alternative approach might be to leverage other info from the name resolutions instead of `doc_link_resolutions`. After all, all we need is to get the resolution from a combination of `(module, name)`. However, I believe they would yield the same outcome, both skipping this lint.
match lowering: consistently lower bindings deepest-first
Currently when lowering match expressions to MIR, we do a funny little dance with the order of bindings. I attempt to explain it in the third commit: we handle refutable (i.e. needing a test) patterns differently than irrefutable ones. This leads to inconsistencies, as reported in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120210. The reason we need a dance at all is for situations like:
```rust
fn foo1(x: NonCopyStruct) {
let y @ NonCopyStruct { copy_field: z } = x;
// the above should turn into
let z = x.copy_field;
let y = x;
}
```
Here the `y ```````@```````` binding will move out of `x`, so we need to copy the field first.
I believe that the inconsistency came about when we fixed https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/69971, and didn't notice that the fix didn't extend to refutable patterns. My guess then is that ordering bindings by "deepest-first, otherwise source order" is a sound choice. This PR implements that (at least I hope, match lowering is hard to follow 🥲).
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120210
r? ```````@oli-obk``````` since you merged the original fix to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/69971
cc ```````@matthewjasper```````
Make it so that async-fn-in-trait is compatible with a concrete future in implementation
There's no technical reason why an AFIT like `async fn foo()` cannot be satisfied with an implementation signature like `fn foo() -> Pin<Box<dyn Future<Output = ()> + 'static>>`.
We rejected this previously because we were uncertain about how AFITs worked with refinement, but I don't believe this needs to be a restriction any longer.
r? oli-obk
resolve: Unload speculatively resolved crates before freezing cstore
Name resolution sometimes loads additional crates to improve diagnostics (e.g. suggest imports).
Not all of these diagnostics result in errors, sometimes they are just warnings, like in #117772.
If additional crates loaded speculatively stay and gets listed by things like `query crates` then they may produce further errors like duplicated lang items, because lang items from speculatively loaded crates are as good as from non-speculatively loaded crates.
They can probably do things like adding unintended impls from speculatively loaded crates to method resolution as well.
The extra crates will also get into the crate's metadata as legitimate dependencies.
In this PR I remove the speculative crates from cstore when name resolution is finished and cstore is frozen.
This is better than e.g. filtering away speculative crates in `query crates` because things like `DefId`s referring to these crates and leaking to later compilation stages can produce ICEs much easier, allowing to detect them.
The unloading could potentially be skipped if any errors were reported (to allow using `DefId`s from speculatively loaded crates for recovery), but I didn't do it in this PR because I haven't seen such cases of recovery. We can reconsider later if any relevant ICEs are reported.
Unblocks https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117772.
Stop bailing out from compilation just because there were incoherent traits
fixes#120343
but also has a lot of "type annotations needed" fallout. Some are fixed in the second commit.
Make `NonZero` constructors generic.
This makes `NonZero` constructors generic, so that `NonZero::new` can be used without turbofish syntax.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120257
~~I cannot figure out how to make this work with `const` traits. Not sure if I'm using it wrong or whether there's a bug:~~
```rust
101 | if n == T::ZERO {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected `host`, found `true`
|
= note: expected constant `host`
found constant `true`
```
r? `@dtolnay`
Reconstify `Add`
r? project-const-traits
I'm not happy with the ui test changes (or failures because I did not bless them and include the diffs in this PR). There is at least some bugs I need to look and try fix:
1. A third duplicated diagnostic when a consumer crate that does not have `effects` enabled has a trait selection error for an upstream const_trait trait. See tests/ui/ufcs/ufcs-qpath-self-mismatch.rs.
2. For some reason, making `Add` a const trait would stop us from suggesting `T: Add` when we try to add two `T`s without that bound. See tests/ui/suggestions/issue-97677.rs
Record coroutine kind in coroutine generics
Oops, added a new substitution (the "kind" ty) to coroutines but forgot to record it in the `generics_of`. I'm surprised I left this out of the coroutine-closure PR -- I thought I made this change; I possibly rebased it out by accident.
Fixes#120732
r? oli-obk
Add parallel rustc ui tests
Updates #118698
Add some ui tests for parallel rustc front end
This is a relatively large feature so I think it's worth creating a new entity in tests/ui folder, so we need to modify the limit in tidy.
Suggest turning `if let` into irrefutable `let` if appropriate
When encountering an `if let` tail expression without an `else` arm for an enum with a single variant, suggest writing an irrefutable `let` binding instead.
```
error[E0317]: `if` may be missing an `else` clause
--> $DIR/irrefutable-if-let-without-else.rs:8:5
|
LL | fn foo(x: Enum) -> i32 {
| --- expected `i32` because of this return type
LL | / if let Enum::Variant(value) = x {
LL | | value
LL | | }
| |_____^ expected `i32`, found `()`
|
= note: `if` expressions without `else` evaluate to `()`
= help: consider adding an `else` block that evaluates to the expected type
help: consider using an irrefutable `let` binding instead
|
LL ~ let Enum::Variant(value) = x;
LL ~ value
|
```
Fix#61788.
Mark "unused binding" suggestion as maybe incorrect
Ignoring unused bindings should be a determination made by a human, `rustfix` shouldn't auto-apply the suggested change.
Fix#54196.
Add FileCheck annotations to MIR-opt SROA tests
Part of #116971, adds FileCheck annotations to SROA MIR-opt tests in `tests/mir-opt/sroa` and a few uncategorized files.
r? cjgillot
