Fix a regression in the configuration folder
This fixes#34028, a regression caused by #33706 in which unconfigured impl items generated by a macro in an impl item position are not removed.
r? @nrc
Projection cache and better warnings for #32330
This PR does three things:
- it lays the groundwork for the more precise subtyping rules discussed in #32330, but does not enable them;
- it issues warnings when the result of a leak-check or subtyping check relies on a late-bound region which will late become early-bound when #32330 is fixed;
- it introduces a cache for projection in the inference context.
I'm not 100% happy with the approach taken by the cache here, but it seems like a step in the right direction. It results in big wins on some test cases, but not as big as previous versions -- I think because it is caching the `Vec<Obligation>` (whereas before I just returned the normalized type with an empty vector). However, that change was needed to fix an ICE in @alexcrichton's future-rs module (I haven't fully tracked the cause of that ICE yet). Also, because trans/the collector use a fresh inference context for every call to `fulfill_obligation`, they don't profit nearly as much from this cache as they ought to.
Still, here are the results from the future-rs `retry.rs`:
```
06:26 <nmatsakis> time: 6.246; rss: 44MB item-bodies checking
06:26 <nmatsakis> time: 54.783; rss: 63MB translation item collection
06:26 <nmatsakis> time: 140.086; rss: 86MB translation
06:26 <nmatsakis> time: 0.361; rss: 46MB item-bodies checking
06:26 <nmatsakis> time: 5.299; rss: 63MB translation item collection
06:26 <nmatsakis> time: 12.140; rss: 86MB translation
```
~~Another example is the example from #31849. For that, I get 34s to run item-bodies without any cache. The version of the cache included here takes 2s to run item-bodies type-checking. An alternative version which doesn't track nested obligations takes 0.2s, but that version ICEs on @alexcrichton's future-rs (and may well be incorrect, I've not fully convinced myself of that). So, a definite win, but I think there's definitely room for further progress.~~
Pushed a modified version which improves performance of the case from #31849:
```
lunch-box. time rustc --stage0 ~/tmp/issue-31849.rs -Z no-trans
real 0m33.539s
user 0m32.932s
sys 0m0.570s
lunch-box. time rustc --stage2 ~/tmp/issue-31849.rs -Z no-trans
real 0m0.195s
user 0m0.154s
sys 0m0.042s
```
Some sort of cache is also needed for unblocking further work on lazy normalization, since that will lean even more heavily on the cache, and will also require cycle detection.
r? @arielb1
Incr. comp. dep-node for traits, tests
Introduce new tests and also make dep-node for trait selection a bit more selective.
Fixes#33850
r? @michaelwoerister
MSVC requires unwinding code to be split to a tree of *funclets*, where each funclet
can only branch to itself or to to its parent.
Luckily, the code we generates matches this pattern. Recover that structure in
an analyze pass and translate according to that.
Rename main thread from "<main>" to "main".
Fix issue #33789
We may need to discuss whether this counts as a breaking change since code may check the main thread name against "\<main\>". Discussion is in #33789
Rewrite variadic-ffi pass to use test helper
The sprintf used in this test previously isn’t available on some versions of MSVC.
Fixes#32305
r? @alexcrichton
Hopefully this pacifies the 32bit windows. Apparently there’s an ABI out there that not only allows
non-64 bit variadic arguments, but also has differing ABI for them!
Good thing all variadic functions are unsafe.
Add AST validation pass and move some checks to it
The purpose of this pass is to catch constructions that fit into AST data structures, but not permitted by the language. As an example, `impl`s don't have visibilities, but for convenience and uniformity with other items they are represented with a structure `Item` which has `Visibility` field.
This pass is intended to run after expansion of macros and syntax extensions (and before lowering to HIR), so it can catch erroneous constructions that were generated by them. This pass allows to remove ad hoc semantic checks from the parser, which can be overruled by syntax extensions and occasionally macros.
The checks can be put here if they are simple, local, don't require results of any complex analysis like name resolution or type checking and maybe don't logically fall into other passes. I expect most of errors generated by this pass to be non-fatal and allowing the compilation to proceed.
I intend to move some more checks to this pass later and maybe extend it with new checks, like, for example, identifier validity. Given that syntax extensions are going to be stabilized in the measurable future, it's important that they would not be able to subvert usual language rules.
In this patch I've added two new checks - a check for labels named `'static` and a check for lifetimes and labels named `'_`. The first one gives a hard error, the second one - a future compatibility warning.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/33059 ([breaking-change])
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1177
r? @nrc
stable features lint warning mentions version stabilized
To accomplish this, we alter the checks in `rustc::middle::stability` to
use the `StabilityLevel` defined in `syntax::attr` (which includes the
version in which the feature was stabilized) rather than the local
`StabilityLevel` in the same module, and make the
`declared_stable_lang_features` field of
`syntax::feature_gate::Features` hold a Vec of feature-name, span
tuples (in analogy to the `declared_lib_features` field) rather than
just spans.
Fixes#33394.
r? @brson (tagging Brian because he [wrote](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/21958) the lint)
Reject a LHS formed of a single sequence TT during `macro_rules!` checking.
This was already rejected during expansion. Encountering malformed LHS or RHS during expansion is now considered a bug.
Follow up to #33689.
r? @pnkfelix
Note: this can break code that defines such macros but does not use them.
When we do a "HR subtype" check, we replace all late-bound regions (LBR)
in the subtype with fresh variables, and skolemize the late-bound
regions in the supertype. If those skolemized regions from the supertype
wind up being super-regions (directly or indirectly) of either
- another skolemized region; or,
- some region that pre-exists the HR subtype check
- e.g., a region variable that is not one of those created
to represent bound regions in the subtype
then the subtype check fails.
What will change when we fix#32330 is that some of the LBR in the
subtype may become early-bound. In that case, they would no longer be in
the "permitted set" of variables that can be related to a skolemized
type.
So the foundation for this warning is to collect variables that we found
to be related to a skolemized type. For each of them, we have a
`BoundRegion` which carries a `Issue32330` flag. We check whether any of
those flags indicate that this variable was created from a lifetime
that will change from late- to early-bound. If so, we issue a warning
indicating that the results of compilation may change.
This is imperfect, since there are other kinds of code that will not
compile once #32330 is fixed. However, it fixes the errors observed in
practice on crater runs.
Currently, we consider region subtyping a failure
if a skolemized lifetime is relatable to any
other lifetime in any way at all. But a more precise
formulation is to say that a skolemized lifetime:
- must not have any *incoming* edges in the region graph
- only has *outgoing* edges to nodes that are `'static`
To enforce the latter requirement, we add edges from `'static -> 'x` for
each lifetime '`x' reachable from a skolemized region.
We now have to add a new `pop_skolemized` routine to do cleanup.
Whereas before if there were *any* edges relating to a skolemized
region, we would return `Err` and hence rollback the transaction, we now
tolerate some edges and return `Ok`. Therefore, the `pop_skolemized`
routine runs and cleans up those edges.
To accomplish this, we alter the checks in `rustc::middle::stability` to
use the `StabilityLevel` defined in `syntax::attr` (which includes the
version in which the feature was stabilized) rather than the local
`StabilityLevel` in the same module, and make the
`declared_stable_lang_features` field of
`syntax::feature_gate::Features` hold a Vec of feature-name, span
tuples (in analogy to the `declared_lib_features` field) rather than
just spans.
This is in the matter of issue #33394.
