Miri provenance cleanup
Reviewing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95826 by ``@carbotaniuman`` made me realize that we could clean things up a little here.
``@carbotaniuman`` please let me know if you're okay with landing this (it will create a lot of conflicts with your PR), or if you'd prefer incorporating the ideas from this PR into yours. I think we want to end up in a situation where the function you called `ptr_reify_alloc` returns just two things, a concrete tag and an offset. Getting an `AllocId` from a concrete tag should be infallible like now. However a concrete tag and `Tag` don't have to be the same type.
r? ``@oli-obk``
interpret: Fix writing uninit to an allocation
When calling `mark_init`, we need to also be mindful of what happens with the relocations! Specifically, when we de-init memory, we need to clear relocations in that range as well or else strange things will happen (and printing will not show the de-init, since relocations take precedence there).
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/2068.
Here's the Miri testcase that this fixes (requires `-Zmiri-disable-validation`):
```rust
use std::mem::MaybeUninit;
fn main() { unsafe {
let mut x = MaybeUninit::<i64>::uninit();
// Put in a ptr.
x.as_mut_ptr().cast::<&i32>().write_unaligned(&0);
// Overwrite parts of that pointer with 'uninit' through a Scalar.
let ptr = x.as_mut_ptr().cast::<i32>();
*ptr = MaybeUninit::uninit().assume_init();
// Reading this back should hence work fine.
let _c = *ptr;
} }
```
Previously this failed with
```
error: unsupported operation: unable to turn pointer into raw bytes
--> ../miri/uninit.rs:11:14
|
11 | let _c = *ptr;
| ^^^^ unable to turn pointer into raw bytes
|
= help: this is likely not a bug in the program; it indicates that the program performed an operation that the interpreter does not support
= note: inside `main` at ../miri/uninit.rs:11:14
```
Refactor loop into iterator; simplify negation logic.
is_dummy should return when a non-dummy is found, but instead is iterated until completion. With some inspiration from line 323 this was refactored to a single line that returns once a single counterexample is found.
asm: Add a kreg0 register class on x86 which includes k0
Previously we only exposed a kreg register class which excludes the k0
register since it can't be used in many instructions. However k0 is a
valid register and we need to have a way of marking it as clobbered for
clobber_abi.
Fixes#94977
Previously we only exposed a kreg register class which excludes the k0
register since it can't be used in many instructions. However k0 is a
valid register and we need to have a way of marking it as clobbered for
clobber_abi.
Fixes#94977
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #94493 (Improved diagnostic on failure to meet send bound on future in a foreign crate)
- #95809 (Fix typo in bootstrap.py)
- #96086 (Remove `--extern-location` and all associated code)
- #96089 (`alloc`: make `vec!` unavailable under `no_global_oom_handling`)
- #96122 (Fix an invalid error for a suggestion to add a slice in pattern-matching)
- #96142 (Stop using CRATE_DEF_INDEX outside of metadata encoding.)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Stop using CRATE_DEF_INDEX outside of metadata encoding.
`CRATE_DEF_ID` and `CrateNum::as_def_id` are almost always what we want. We should not manipulate raw `DefIndex` outside of metadata encoding.
Remove `--extern-location` and all associated code
`--extern-location` was an experiment to investigate the best way to
generate useful diagnostics for unused dependency warnings by enabling a
build system to identify the corresponding build config.
While I did successfully use this, I've since been convinced the
alternative `--json unused-externs` mechanism is the way to go, and
there's no point in having two mechanisms with basically the same
functionality.
This effectively reverts https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72603
Improved diagnostic on failure to meet send bound on future in a foreign crate
Provide a better diagnostic on failure to meet send bound on futures in a foreign crate.
fixes#78543
show suggestion to replace generic bounds with associated types in more cases
Moves the hint to replace generic parameters with associated type bounds from the "not all associated type bounds are specified"(`E0191`) to "to many generic type parameters provided"(`E0107`).
Since `E0191` is only emitted in places where all associated types must be specified (when creating `dyn` types), the suggesting is currently not shown for other generic type uses (such as in generic type bounds). With this change the suggesting is always emitted when the number of excess generic parameters matches the number of unbound associated types.
Main motivation for the change was a lack of useful suggesting when doing
```rust
fn foo<I: Iterator<usize>>(i: I) {}
```
Report undeclared lifetimes during late resolution.
First step in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91557
We reuse the rib design of the current resolution framework. Specific `LifetimeRib` and `LifetimeRibKind` types are introduced. The most important variant is `LifetimeRibKind::Generics`, which happens each time we encounter something which may introduce generic lifetime parameters. It can be an item or a `for<...>` binder. The `LifetimeBinderKind` specifies how this rib behaves with respect to in-band lifetimes.
r? `@petrochenkov`
Remove last vestiges of skippng ident span hashing
This removes a comment that no longer applies, and properly hashes
the full ident for path segments.
Refactor HIR item-like traversal (part 1)
Issue #95004
- Create hir_crate_items query which traverses tcx.hir_crate(()).owners to return a hir::ModuleItems
- use tcx.hir_crate_items in tcx.hir().items() to return an iterator of hir::ItemId
- use tcx.hir_crate_items to introduce a tcx.hir().par_items(impl Fn(hir::ItemId)) to traverse all items in parallel;
Signed-off-by: Miguel Guarniz <mi9uel9@gmail.com>
cc `@cjgillot`
Strict provenance lint diagnostics improvements
Use `multipart_suggestion` instead of `span_suggestion` and getting a snippet for the expression. Also don't suggest unnecessary parenthesis in `lossy_provenance_casts`.
cc ``@estebank``
``@rustbot`` label A-diagnostics
rustc_metadata: Do not encode unnecessary module children
This should remove the syntax context shift and the special case for `ExternCrate` in decoder in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95880.
This PR also shifts some work from decoding to encoding, which is typically useful for performance (but probably not much in this case).
r? `@cjgillot`
Include Refs in Valtree Creation
This adds references to `const_to_valtree`, which isn't used in the compiler yet, but after the previous changes we made to the thir and mir representations and this change we should be able to finally introduce them in the next PR.
I wasn't able to properly test this code, except indirectly by including a call of `const_to_valtree` in the code that currently creates constants (`turn_into_const_value`).
r? `@lcnr`
cc `@oli-obk` `@RalfJung`
Parse inner attributes on inline const block
According to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/84414#issuecomment-826150936, inner attributes are intended to be supported *"in all containers for statements (or some subset of statements)"*.
This PR adds inner attribute parsing and pretty-printing for inline const blocks (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76001), which contain statements just like an unsafe block or a loop body.
```rust
let _ = const {
#![allow(...)]
let x = ();
x
};
```
resolve: Create dummy bindings for all unresolved imports
Apparently such bindings weren't previously created for all unresolved imports, causing issues like https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/95879.
In this PR I'm trying to create such dummy bindings in a more centralized way by calling `import_dummy_binding` once for all imports in `finalize_imports`.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/95879.
Allow self-profiler to only record potentially costly arguments when argument recording is turned on
As discussed [on zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/247081-t-compiler.2Fperformance/topic/Identifying.20proc-macro.20slowdowns/near/277304909) with `@wesleywiser,` I'd like to record proc-macro expansions in the self-profiler, with some detailed data (per-expansion spans for example, to follow #95473).
At the same time, I'd also like to avoid doing expensive things when tracking a generic activity's arguments, if they were not specifically opted into the event filter mask, to allow the self-profiler to be used in hotter contexts.
This PR tries to offer:
- a way to ensure a closure to record arguments will only be called in that situation, so that potentially costly arguments can still be recorded when needed. With the additional requirement that, if possible, it would offer a way to record non-owned data without adding many `generic_activity_with_arg_{...}`-style methods. This lead to the `generic_activity_with_arg_recorder` single entry-point, and the closure parameter would offer the new methods, able to be executed in a context where costly argument could be created without disturbing the profiled piece of code.
- some facilities/patterns allowing to record more rustc specific data in this situation, without making `rustc_data_structures` where the self-profiler is defined, depend on other rustc crates (causing circular dependencies): in particular, spans. They are quite tricky to turn into strings (if the default `Debug` impl output does not match the context one needs them for), and since I'd also like to avoid the allocation there when arg recording is turned off today, that has turned into another flexibility requirement for the API in this PR (separating the span-specific recording into an extension trait). **edit**: I've removed this from the PR so that it's easier to review, and opened https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95739.
- allow for extensibility in the future: other ways to record arguments, or additional data attached to them could be added in the future (e.g. recording the argument's name as well as its data).
Some areas where I'd love feedback:
- the API and names: the `EventArgRecorder` and its method for example. As well as the verbosity that comes from the increased flexibility.
- if I should convert the existing `generic_activity_with_arg{s}` to just forward to `generic_activity_with_arg_recorder` + `recorder.record_arg` (or remove them altogether ? Probably not): I've used the new API in the simple case I could find of allocating for an arg that may not be recorded, and the rest don't seem costly.
- [x] whether this API should panic if no arguments were recorded by the user-provided closure (like this PR currently does: it seems like an error to use an API dedicated to record arguments but not call the methods to then do so) or if this should just record a generic activity without arguments ?
- whether the `record_arg` function should be `#[inline(always)]`, like the `generic_activity_*` functions ?
As mentioned, r? `@wesleywiser` following our recent discussion.
