changelog: [`useless-nonzero-new_unchecked`]: new lint
Close#13991
### What it does
Checks for `NonZero*::new_unchecked(<literal>)` being used in a `const`
context.
### Why is this bad?
Using `NonZero*::new_unchecked()` is an `unsafe` function and requires
an `unsafe` context. When used with an
integer literal in a `const` context, `NonZero*::new().unwrap()` will
provide the same result with identical
runtime performances while not requiring `unsafe`.
### Example
```no_run
const PLAYERS: NonZeroUsize = unsafe { NonZeroUsize::new_unchecked(3) };
```
Use instead:
```no_run
const PLAYERS: NonZeroUsize = NonZeroUsize::new(3).unwrap();
```
Commit 9ef6e2199c introduced a check to
ensure that Clippy doesn't consider a lifetime present in an explicit
self types as being the default for an elided output lifetime. For
example, elision did not work in the case like:
```rust
fn func(self: &Rc<Self>, &str) -> &str { … }
```
Since Rust 1.81.0, the lifetime in the self type is now considered the
default for elision. Elision should then be suggested when appropriate.
changelog: [`needless_lifetimes`]: suggest elision of lifetimes present
in explicit self types as well
r? @Alexendoo
because of #8278
Commit 9ef6e2199c introduced a check to
ensure that Clippy doesn't consider a lifetime present in an explicit
self type as being the default for an elided output lifetime. For
example, elision did not work in the case like:
```rust
fn func(self: &Rc<Self>, &str) -> &str { … }
```
Since Rust 1.81.0, the lifetime in the self type is now considered
the default for elision. Elision should then be suggested when
appropriate.
changelog: [`manual_ok_err`]: new lint
Detect manual implementations of `.ok()` or `.err()`, as in
```rust
let a = match func() {
Ok(v) => Some(v),
Err(_) => None,
};
let b = if let Err(v) = func() {
Some(v)
} else {
None
};
```
which can be replaced by
```rust
let a = func().ok();
let b = func().err();
```
This pattern was detected in the wild in the Rust reimplementation of
coreutils:
https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/6886#pullrequestreview-2465160137
Fixes#11846.
This PR has three commits:
- The first commit adds an `initializer-suggestions` configuration to
control suggestion applicability when initializers are present. The
following are the options:
- "none": do not suggest
- "maybe-incorrect": suggest, but do not apply suggestions with `--fix`
- "machine-applicable": suggest and apply suggestions with `--fix`
- The second commit fixes suggestions to handle field attributes
(problem [noticed by
@samueltardieu](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/13737#discussion_r1859261645)).
- The third commit adds `initializer-suggestions = "machine-applicable"`
to Clippy's `clippy.toml` and applies the suggestions. (Nothing seems to
break.)
---
changelog: make `inconsistent_struct_constructor` "all fields are
shorthand" requirement configurable
Begin to implement type system layer of unsafe binders
Mostly TODOs, but there's a lot of match arms that are basically just noops so I wanted to split these out before I put up the MIR lowering/projection part of this logic.
r? oli-obk
Tracking:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130516
Fixes#13375
I've added the lint next to the other attribute-related ones. Not sure
if this is the correct place, since while we are looking after the
`packed`-attribute (there is nothing we can do about types defined
elsewhere), we are more concerned about the type's representation set by
the attribute (instead of "duplicate attributes" and such).
The lint simply looks at the attributes themselves without concern for
the item-kind, since items where `repr` is not allowed end up in a
compile-error anyway.
I'm somewhat concerned about the level of noise this lint would cause
if/when it goes into stable, although it does _not_ come up in
`lintcheck`.
```
changelog: [`repr_packed_without_abi`]: Initial implementation
```
Add some convenience helper methods on `hir::Safety`
Makes a lot of call sites simpler and should make any refactorings needed for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134090#issuecomment-2541332415 simpler, as fewer sites have to be touched in case we end up storing some information in the variants of `hir::Safety`
We realized when running `clippy --fix` on rustdoc (PR comment
[here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133537/files#r1861377721))
that some comments were removed, which is problematic. This PR checks
that comments outside of `match` arms are taken into account before
emitting the lint.
changelog: Fix `single_match` lint being emitted when it should not
Add AST support for unsafe binders
I'm splitting up #130514 into pieces. It's impossible for me to keep up with a huge PR like that. I'll land type system support for this next, probably w/o MIR lowering, which will come later.
r? `@oli-obk`
cc `@BoxyUwU` and `@lcnr` who also may want to look at this, though this PR doesn't do too much yet
Keep track of parse errors in `mod`s and don't emit resolve errors for paths involving them
When we expand a `mod foo;` and parse `foo.rs`, we now track whether that file had an unrecovered parse error that reached the end of the file. If so, we keep that information around in the HIR and mark its `DefId` in the `Resolver`. When resolving a path like `foo::bar`, we do not emit any errors for "`bar` not found in `foo`", as we know that the parse error might have caused `bar` to not be parsed and accounted for.
When this happens in an existing project, every path referencing `foo` would be an irrelevant compile error. Instead, we now skip emitting anything until `foo.rs` is fixed. Tellingly enough, we didn't have any test for errors caused by expansion of `mod`s with parse errors.
Fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97734.
When we expand a `mod foo;` and parse `foo.rs`, we now track whether that file had an unrecovered parse error that reached the end of the file. If so, we keep that information around. When resolving a path like `foo::bar`, we do not emit any errors for "`bar` not found in `foo`", as we know that the parse error might have caused `bar` to not be parsed and accounted for.
When this happens in an existing project, every path referencing `foo` would be an irrelevant compile error. Instead, we now skip emitting anything until `foo.rs` is fixed. Tellingly enough, we didn't have any test for errors caused by `mod` expansion.
Fix#97734.
Initial implementation of `#[feature(default_field_values]`, proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3681.
Support default fields in enum struct variant
Allow default values in an enum struct variant definition:
```rust
pub enum Bar {
Foo {
bar: S = S,
baz: i32 = 42 + 3,
}
}
```
Allow using `..` without a base on an enum struct variant
```rust
Bar::Foo { .. }
```
`#[derive(Default)]` doesn't account for these as it is still gating `#[default]` only being allowed on unit variants.
Support `#[derive(Default)]` on enum struct variants with all defaulted fields
```rust
pub enum Bar {
#[default]
Foo {
bar: S = S,
baz: i32 = 42 + 3,
}
}
```
Check for missing fields in typeck instead of mir_build.
Expand test with `const` param case (needs `generic_const_exprs` enabled).
Properly instantiate MIR const
The following works:
```rust
struct S<A> {
a: Vec<A> = Vec::new(),
}
S::<i32> { .. }
```
Add lint for default fields that will always fail const-eval
We *allow* this to happen for API writers that might want to rely on users'
getting a compile error when using the default field, different to the error
that they would get when the field isn't default. We could change this to
*always* error instead of being a lint, if we wanted.
This will *not* catch errors for partially evaluated consts, like when the
expression relies on a const parameter.
Suggestions when encountering `Foo { .. }` without `#[feature(default_field_values)]`:
- Suggest adding a base expression if there are missing fields.
- Suggest enabling the feature if all the missing fields have optional values.
- Suggest removing `..` if there are no missing fields.
There are two modules in `clippy_utils` that are currently in the form
of:
```
src/
| ast_utils/
| ty/
|
| ast_utils.rs
| ty.rs
```
This PR moves the top-level modules to become `mod.rs`, within their
respective folders.
```
src/
| ast_utils/
| | mod.rs
|
| ty/
| | mod.rs
```
This reduces clutter in the `src` folder, and makes it easier to find
related files in certain editors.[^0] This also appears to be the
standard used in other crates in this repository, though I looked very
briefly.
I do realize that this is a style / opinionated change, so I'll close it
if it receives much push-back. :)
[^0]: I use VSCode, which groups all folders together and all files
separately. This means that `ty.rs` is quite "far" away from the `ty/`
folder, which makes it move difficult to navigate between the two.
```
changelog: none
```
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
