Install missing 'rust-gdbui''
PR #53774 added `rust-gdbui` as wrapper to launch [gdbui](https://gdbgui.com/), similar to `rust-gdb`.
Unfortunately I've never seen the script in my local installation (from rustup, using rust 1.31.1). @tromey on the PR [suggested it might be missing](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/53774#issuecomment-419704939) from the installation process.
This PR simply adds a line for `rust-gdbui` too.
[rustbuild] Rebuild std after changes to codegen backends
Use `clear_if_dirty` on std for backend changes, just as we do for
changes to rustc itself, so new codegen is correctly applied to all
later compiler stages.
Fixes#48298.
Use `clear_if_dirty` on std for backend changes, just as we do for
changes to rustc itself, so new codegen is correctly applied to all
later compiler stages.
Fixes#48298.
Use CMAKE_{C,CXX}_COMPILER_LAUNCHER for ccache
CMake 3.4 and newer which is the required minimum version for LLVM
supports CMAKE_{C,CXX}_COMPILER_LAUNCHER for settting the compiler
launcher such as ccache which doesn't require shifting arguments.
This fixes a mistake where miri was accidentally left out of the
build-manifest parsing, meaning that today's nightly generated a
manifest with invalid urls!
This commit is intended on fixing a regression from #57286 where the
distributed LLVM shared library unfortunately depends on a dynamic copy
of libstdc++, meaning we're no longer as binary compatible as we
thought! This tweaks the build of LLVM as out distribution is slightly
different now, and is hoped to fix the issue.
Closes#57426
Provide the option to use libc++ even on all platforms
This is the default on platforms which use libc++ as the default C++
library but this option allows using libc++ on others as well.
CMake 3.4 and newer which is the required minimum version for LLVM
supports CMAKE_{C,CXX}_COMPILER_LAUNCHER for settting the compiler
launcher such as ccache which doesn't require shifting arguments.
When building a distributed compiler on Linux where we use ThinLTO to
create the LLVM shared object this commit switches the compiler to
dynamically linking that LLVM artifact instead of statically linking to
LLVM. The primary goal here is to reduce CI compile times, avoiding two+
ThinLTO builds of all of LLVM. By linking dynamically to LLVM we'll
reuse the one ThinLTO step done by LLVM's build itself.
Lots of discussion about this change can be found [here] and down. A
perf run will show whether this is worth it or not!
[here]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/53245#issuecomment-417015334
std: Use backtrace-sys from crates.io
This commit switches the standard library to using the `backtrace-sys`
crate from crates.io instead of duplicating the logic here in the Rust
repositor with the `backtrace-sys`'s crate's logic.
Eventually this will hopefully be a good step towards using the
`backtrace` crate directly from crates.io itself, but we're not quite
there yet! Hopefully this is a small incremental first step we can take.
./x.py used to automatically check out the right commit when a submodule was outdated and ./x.py build was run
and submodules handling was enabled in config.toml (submodules = true).
But it threw an error:
[...]
failed to run: git submodule -q sync --progress src/tools/clippy
The commit removes the --progress from git submodule call.
Fixes#57080
This commit switches the standard library to using the `backtrace-sys`
crate from crates.io instead of duplicating the logic here in the Rust
repositor with the `backtrace-sys`'s crate's logic.
Eventually this will hopefully be a good step towards using the
`backtrace` crate directly from crates.io itself, but we're not quite
there yet! Hopefully this is a small incremental first step we can take.
bootstrap: Link LLVM as a dylib with ThinLTO
When building a distributed compiler on Linux where we use ThinLTO to
create the LLVM shared object this commit switches the compiler to
dynamically linking that LLVM artifact instead of statically linking to
LLVM. The primary goal here is to reduce CI compile times, avoiding two+
ThinLTO builds of all of LLVM. By linking dynamically to LLVM we'll
reuse the one ThinLTO step done by LLVM's build itself.
Lots of discussion about this change can be found [here] and down. A
perf run will show whether this is worth it or not!
[here]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/53245#issuecomment-417015334
Add --progress to git submodule commands in x.py
This is a relatively new flag, but it means that git will indicate the progress of the update as it would with regular clones. This is especially helpful as some of the submodules are really big and it's difficult to tell if it's hanging or still updating.
Add targets thumbv7neon-linux-androideabi and thumbv7neon-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
These two targets enable both thumb-mode and NEON for ARMv7 CPUs.
This another attempt at #49902, which cannot be reopened. Between that PR and this one, some subrepos with C code whose build systems were failing went away.
When building a distributed compiler on Linux where we use ThinLTO to
create the LLVM shared object this commit switches the compiler to
dynamically linking that LLVM artifact instead of statically linking to
LLVM. The primary goal here is to reduce CI compile times, avoiding two+
ThinLTO builds of all of LLVM. By linking dynamically to LLVM we'll
reuse the one ThinLTO step done by LLVM's build itself.
Lots of discussion about this change can be found [here] and down. A
perf run will show whether this is worth it or not!
[here]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/53245#issuecomment-417015334
Bump minimum required LLVM version to 6.0
Based on the discussion in #55842, while the overall position of Rust wrt LLVM continues to be contentious, there does seem to be a consensus that there is no need for continued support of LLVM 5. This PR bumps our version requirement to LLVM 6.0 and makes Travis run against that.
I hope that this is going to unblock #52694. If I understand correctly, while this issue still exists in LLVM 6, Ubuntu has backported the relevant patch.
r? @alexcrichton
Bootstrap: Add testsuite for compiletest tool
This adds a test suite for compiletest so that the tester is tested, too.
The (currently) single unit test of the compiletest tool was never executed
on CI. At least I couldn't find any references of it in the logs.
The compiletest tests can then also be executed with:
./x.py test src/tools/compiletest --stage 0
cc #47606
The (currently) single unit test of the compiletest tool was never
executed on CI. At least I couldn't find any references of it in the
logs. This adds a test suite for compiletest so that our tester is
tested, too.
The compiletest tests can then also be executed with:
./x.py test src/tools/compiletest
This was an accidental regression from #56092, but for `no_std` targets
being built and distributed we want to be sure to activate the
compiler-builtins `mem` feature which demangles important memory-related
intrinsics.
Overhaul `FileSearch` and `SearchPaths`
`FileSearch::search()` traverses one or more directories. For each
directory it generates a `Vec<PathBuf>` containing one element per file
in that directory.
In some benchmarks this occurs enough that the allocations done for the
`PathBuf`s are significant, and in practice a small number of
directories are being traversed over and over again. For example, when
compiling the `tokio-webpush-simple` benchmark, two directories are
traversed 58 times each. Each of these directories have more than 100
files.
We can do all the necessary traversals up front, when `Session` is created,
and get the `Vec<PathBuf>`s then.
This reduces instruction counts on several benchmarks by 1--5%.
r? @alexcrichton
CC @eddyb, @michaelwoerister, @nikomatsakis
* Update bootstrap compiler
* Update version to 1.33.0
* Remove some `#[cfg(stage0)]` annotations
Actually updating the version number is blocked on updating Cargo
Ever since we added a Cargo-based build system for the compiler the
standard library has always been a little special, it's never been able
to depend on crates.io crates for runtime dependencies. This has been a
result of various limitations, namely that Cargo doesn't understand that
crates from crates.io depend on libcore, so Cargo tries to build crates
before libcore is finished.
I had an idea this afternoon, however, which lifts the strategy
from #52919 to directly depend on crates.io crates from the standard
library. After all is said and done this removes a whopping three
submodules that we need to manage!
The basic idea here is that for any crate `std` depends on it adds an
*optional* dependency on an empty crate on crates.io, in this case named
`rustc-std-workspace-core`. This crate is overridden via `[patch]` in
this repository to point to a local crate we write, and *that* has a
`path` dependency on libcore.
Note that all `no_std` crates also depend on `compiler_builtins`, but if
we're not using submodules we can publish `compiler_builtins` to
crates.io and all crates can depend on it anyway! The basic strategy
then looks like:
* The standard library (or some transitive dep) decides to depend on a
crate `foo`.
* The standard library adds
```toml
[dependencies]
foo = { version = "0.1", features = ['rustc-dep-of-std'] }
```
* The crate `foo` has an optional dependency on `rustc-std-workspace-core`
* The crate `foo` has an optional dependency on `compiler_builtins`
* The crate `foo` has a feature `rustc-dep-of-std` which activates these
crates and any other necessary infrastructure in the crate.
A sample commit for `dlmalloc` [turns out to be quite simple][commit].
After that all `no_std` crates should largely build "as is" and still be
publishable on crates.io! Notably they should be able to continue to use
stable Rust if necessary, since the `rename-dependency` feature of Cargo
is soon stabilizing.
As a proof of concept, this commit removes the `dlmalloc`,
`libcompiler_builtins`, and `libc` submodules from this repository. Long
thorns in our side these are now gone for good and we can directly
depend on crates.io! It's hoped that in the long term we can bring in
other crates as necessary, but for now this is largely intended to
simply make it easier to manage these crates and remove submodules.
This should be a transparent non-breaking change for all users, but one
possible stickler is that this almost for sure breaks out-of-tree
`std`-building tools like `xargo` and `cargo-xbuild`. I think it should
be relatively easy to get them working, however, as all that's needed is
an entry in the `[patch]` section used to build the standard library.
Hopefully we can work with these tools to solve this problem!
[commit]: 28ee12db81
This commit replaces many usages of `File::open` and reading or writing
with `fs::read_to_string`, `fs::read` and `fs::write`. This reduces code
complexity, and will improve performance for most reads, since the
functions allocate the buffer to be the size of the file.
I believe that this commit will not impact behavior in any way, so some
matches will check the error kind in case the file was not valid UTF-8.
Some of these cases may not actually care about the error.
