Convert warning about `*const _` to a future-compat lint
#46664 was merged before I could convert the soft warning about method lookup on `*const _` into a future-compatibility lint. This PR makes that change.
fixes#46837
tracking issue for the future-compatibility lint: #46906
r? @arielb1
Followup for #46112.
Sorting by crate-num should ensure that we favor `std::foo::bar` over
`any_other_crate::foo::bar`.
Interestingly, *this* change had a much larger impact on our internal
test suite than PR #46708 (which was my original fix to #46112).
Do not emit type errors on recovered blocks
When a parse error occurs on a block, the parser will recover and create
a block with the statements collected until that point. Now a flag
stating that a recovery has been performed in this block is propagated
so that the type checker knows that the type of the block (which will be
identified as `()`) shouldn't be checked against the expectation to
reduce the amount of irrelevant diagnostic errors shown to the user.
Fix#44579.
When a parse error occurs on a block, the parser will recover and create
a block with the statements collected until that point. Now a flag
stating that a recovery has been performed in this block is propagated
so that the type checker knows that the type of the block (which will be
identified as `()`) shouldn't be checked against the expectation to
reduce the amount of irrelevant diagnostic errors shown to the user.
Generics refactoring (groundwork for const generics)
These changes were suggested by @eddyb.
After this change, the `Generics` contain one `Vec` of an enum for the generic parameters, rather than two separate `Vec`s for lifetime and type parameters. Type params and const params will need to be in a shared `Vec` to preserve their ordering, and moving lifetimes into the same `Vec` should simplify the code that processes `Generics`.
The Generics now contain one Vec of an enum for the generic parameters,
rather than two separate Vec's for lifetime and type parameters.
Additionally, places that previously used Vec<LifetimeDef> now use
Vec<GenericParam> instead.
syntax: Follow-up to the incorrect qpath recovery PR
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/46788
Add tests checking that "priority" of qpath recovery is higher than priority of unary and binary operators
Fix regressed parsing of paths with fn-like generic arguments
r? @estebank
Implement non-mod.rs mod statements
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/45385, cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44660
This will fail tidy right now because it doesn't recognize my UI tests as feature-gate tests. However, I'm not sure if compile-fail will work out either because compile-fail usually requires there to be error patterns in the top-level file, which isn't possible with this feature. What's the recommended way to handle this?
nll part 5
Next round of changes from the nll-master branch.
Extensions:
- we now propagate ty-region-outlives constraints out of closures and into their creator when necessary
- we fix a few ICEs that can occur by doing liveness analysis (and the resulting normalization) during type-checking
- we handle the implicit region bound that assumes that each type `T` outlives the fn body
- we handle normalization of inputs/outputs in fn signatures
Not included in this PR (will come next):
- handling `impl Trait`
- tracking causal information
- extended errors
r? @arielb1
Sorting by crate-num should ensure that we favor `std::foo::bar` over
`any_other_crate::foo::bar`.
Interestingly, *this* change had a much larger impact on our internal
test suite than PR #46708 (which was my original fix to #46112).
arbitrary_self_types: add support for raw pointer `self` types
This adds support for raw pointer `self` types, under the `arbitrary_self_types` feature flag. Types like `self: *const Self`, `self: *const Rc<Self>`, `self: Rc<*const Self` are all supported. Object safety checks are updated to allow`self: *const Self` and `self: *mut Self`.
This PR does not add support for `*const self` and `*mut self` syntax. That can be added in a later PR once this code is reviewed and merged.
#44874
r? @arielb1
