Stabilize `PATH` option for `--print KIND=PATH`
This PR propose stabilizing the `PATH` option for `--print KIND=PATH`. This option was previously added in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113780 (as insta-stable before being un-stablized in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114139).
Description of the `PATH` option:
> A filepath may optionally be specified for each requested information kind, in the format `--print KIND=PATH`, just like for `--emit`. When a path is specified, information will be written there instead of to stdout.
------
Description of the original PR [\[link\]](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113780#issue-1807080607):
> **Support --print KIND=PATH command line syntax**
>
> As is already done for `--emit KIND=PATH` and `-L KIND=PATH`.
>
> In the discussion of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/110785, it was pointed out that `--print KIND=PATH` is nicer than trying to apply the single global `-o path` to `--print`'s output, because in general there can be multiple print requests within a single rustc invocation, and anyway `-o` would already be used for a different meaning in the case of `link-args` and `native-static-libs`.
>
> I am interested in using `--print cfg=PATH` in Buck2. Currently Buck2 works around the lack of support for `--print KIND=PATH` by [indirecting through a Python wrapper script](d43cf3a51a/prelude/rust/tools/get_rustc_cfg.py) to redirect rustc's stdout into the location dictated by the build system.
>
> From skimming Cargo's usages of `--print`, it definitely seems like it would benefit from `--print KIND=PATH` too. Currently it is working around the lack of this by inserting `--crate-name=___ --print=crate-name` so that it can look for a line containing `___` as a delimiter between the 2 other `--print` informations it actually cares about. This is commented as a "HACK" and "abuse". 31eda6f7c3/src/cargo/core/compiler/build_context/target_info.rs (L242)
-----
cc `@dtolnay`
r? `@jackh726`
Description of the `PATH` option:
> A filepath may optionally be specified for each requested information
> kind, in the format `--print KIND=PATH`, just like for `--emit`. When
> a path is specified, information will be written there instead of to
> stdout.
Implement refinement lint for RPITIT
Implements a lint that warns against accidentally refining an RPITIT in an implementation. This is not a hard error, and can be suppressed with `#[allow(refining_impl_trait)]`, since this behavior may be desirable -- the lint just serves as an acknowledgement from the impl author that they understand that the types they write in the implementation are an API guarantee.
This compares bounds syntactically, not semantically -- semantic implication is more difficult and essentially relies on adding the ability to keep the RPITIT hidden in the trait system so that things can be proven about the type that shows up in the impl without its own bounds leaking through, either via a new reveal mode or something else. This was experimentally implemented in #111931.
Somewhat opinionated choices:
1. Putting the lint behind `refining_impl_trait` rather than a blanket `refine` lint. This could be changed, but I like keeping the lint specialized to RPITITs so the explanation can be tailored to it.
2. This PR does not include the `#[refine]` attribute or the feature gate, since it's kind of orthogonal and can be added in a separate PR.
r? `@oli-obk`
Lint on invalid usage of `UnsafeCell::raw_get` in reference casting
This PR proposes to take into account `UnsafeCell::raw_get` method call for non-Freeze types for the `invalid_reference_casting` lint.
The goal of this is to catch those kind of invalid reference casting:
```rust
fn as_mut<T>(x: &T) -> &mut T {
unsafe { &mut *std::cell::UnsafeCell::raw_get(x as *const _ as *const _) }
//~^ ERROR casting `&T` to `&mut T` is undefined behavior
}
```
r? `@est31`
fix#115348fix#115348
It looks that:
- In `rustc_mir_build::build`, the body of function will not be built, when the `tcx.check_match(def)` fails due to `non-exhaustive patterns`
- In `rustc_mir_transform::check_unsafety`, the `UnsafetyChecker` collects all `used_unsafe_blocks` in the MIR of a function, and the `UnusedUnsafeVisitor` will visit all `UnsafeBlock`s in the HIR and collect `unused_unsafes`, which are not contained in `used_unsafe_blocks`, and report `unnecessary_unsafe`s
- So the unsafe block in the issue example code will be reported as `unnecessary_unsafe`.
Add explanatory note to 'expected item' error
Fixes#113110
It changes the diagnostic from this:
```
error: expected item, found `5`
--> ../test.rs:1:1
|
1 | 5
| ^ expected item
```
to this:
```
error: expected item, found `5`
--> ../test.rs:1:1
|
1 | 5
| ^ expected item
|
= note: items are things that can appear at the root of a module
= note: for a full list see https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items.html
```
Represent MIR composite debuginfo as projections instead of aggregates
Composite debuginfo for MIR is currently represented as
```
debug name => Type { projection1 => place1, projection2 => place2 };
```
ie. a single `VarDebugInfo` object with that name, and its value a `VarDebugInfoContents::Composite`.
This PR proposes to reverse the representation to be
```
debug name.projection1 => place1;
debug name.projection2 => place2;
```
ie. multiple `VarDebugInfo` objects with each their projection.
This simplifies the handling of composite debuginfo by the compiler by avoiding weird nesting.
Based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115139
Fix error report for size overflow from transmute
Fixes#115402
The span in the error reporting always points to the `dst`, this is an old issue, I may open another PR to fix it.
Make if let guard parsing consistent with normal guards
- Add tests that struct expressions are not allowed in `if let` and `while let` (no change, consistent with `if` and `while`)
- Allow struct expressions in `if let` guards (consistent with `if` guards).
r? `@cjgillot`
Closes#93817
cc #51114
Add support to return value in StableMIR interface and not crash due to compilation error
Invoking `StableMir::run()` on a crate that has any compilation error was crashing the entire process. Instead, return a `CompilerError` so the user knows compilation did not succeed. I believe ICE will also be converted to `CompilerError`.
I'm also adding a possibility for the callback to return a value. I think it will be handy for users (at least it was for my current task of implementing a tool to validate stable-mir). However, if people disagree, I can remove that.
coverage: Explicitly test the coverage maps produced by codegen/LLVM
Our existing coverage tests verify the output of end-to-end coverage reports, but we don't have any way to test the specific mapping information (code regions and their associated counters) that are emitted by `rustc_codegen_llvm` and LLVM. That makes it harder to to be confident in changes that would modify those mappings (whether deliberately or accidentally).
This PR addresses that by adding a new `coverage-map` test suite that does the following:
- Compiles test files to LLVM IR assembly (`.ll`)
- Feeds those IR files to a custom tool (`src/tools/coverage-dump`) that extracts and decodes coverage mappings, and prints them in a more human-readable format
- Checks the output of that tool against known-good snapshots
---
I recommend excluding the last commit while reviewing the main changes, because that last commit is just ~40 test files copied over from `tests/run-coverage`, plus their blessed coverage-map snapshots and a readme file. Those snapshots aren't really intended to be checked by hand; they're mostly there to increase the chances that an unintended change to coverage maps will be observable (even if it requires relatively specific circumstances to manifest).
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #115353 (Emit error instead of ICE when optimized MIR is missing)
- #115488 (Take `&mut Results` in `ResultsVisitor`)
- #115492 (Allow `large_assignments` for Box/Arc/Rc initialization)
- #115519 (Don't ICE on associated type projection without feature gate in new solver)
- #115534 (Expose more information with DefId in smir)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Don't ICE on associated type projection without feature gate in new solver
Self-explanatory, we should avoid ICEs when the feature gate is not enabled. Continue to ICE when the feature gate *is* enabled, though.
Fixes#115500
Allow `large_assignments` for Box/Arc/Rc initialization
Does the `stop linting in box/arc initialization` task of #83518.
r? `@oli-obk` who is E-mentor.
The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but
we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by
codegen/LLVM.
If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or
MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as
the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
We compile each test file to LLVM IR assembly, and then pass that IR to a
dedicated program that can decode LLVM coverage maps and print them in a more
human-readable format. We can then check that output against known-good
snapshots.
This test suite has some advantages over the existing `run-coverage` tests:
- We can test coverage instrumentation without needing to run target binaries.
- We can observe subtle improvements/regressions in the underlying coverage
mappings that don't make a visible difference to coverage reports.
Do not require associated types with Self: Sized to uphold bounds when confirming object candidate
RPITITs and associated types that have `Self: Sized` bounds are opted out of the `dyn Trait` well-formedness check that happens during confirmation. This ensures that we can actually *use* `dyn Trait`s that have associated types that, e.g., have GATs and RPITITs and other naughty things as long as those are opted-out of object safety via a `Self: Sized` bound.
Fixes#115464
This seems like a natural part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/112319#issuecomment-1592574451, and I don't think needs re-litigation.
r? `@oli-obk`
