It's either unneeded (`warn`/`deny`) or can be replaced by individual
lints (`allow`). Also removes some redundant `allow`s covered by the
default `-Aunused` that I saw along the way
changelog: none
`unsafe_fields` is an incomplete feature; comments have been put near
`#![expect(incomplete_features)]` to ensure that we revisit the
situation when the feature becomes complete.
changelog: [`expl_impl_clone_on_copy`]: do not lint in the presence of
`unsafe` fields
Fixes#14558
Blocks created by desugaring will not contain an explicit `return`. Do
not suggest to add it when the user has no control over the desugared
code.
Also, ensure that in a `xxx.await` expression, the suggested `return` is
emitted before the whole expression, not before the `await` keyword.
Fix#14411
changelog: [`implicit_return`]: fix proposed `return` position in the
presence of asynchronous code
There were two bugs here. Let's assume `T` is a singleton type
implementing `Default` and that `f()` takes a `T`:
- `f(<T>::default())` cannot be replaced by `f(<T)` as it was (incorrect
spans – this is tricky because the type relative path uses a base span
covering only `T`, not `<T>`) (third commit)
- The argument of `f(<_>::default())` is inferred correctly, but cannot
be replaced by `<_>` or `_`, as this cannot be used to infer an instance
of a singleton type (first commit).
The second commit offers better error messages by pointing at the whole
expression.
Fix#12654
changelog: [`default_constructed_unit_struct`]: do not suggest incorrect
fix when using a type surrounded by brackets
`non_canonical_partial_ord_impl` will now recognize two forms of
canonical implementations: `Some(self.cmp(other))` and
`self.cmp(other).into()`.
changelog: [`non_canonical_partial_ord_impl`]: recognize
`self.cmp(other).into()` as a canonical implementation of
`PartialOrd::partial_cmp()`.
Fixesrust-lang/rust-clippy#13640
Fixes rust-lang/rust-clippy#14449, introduced in #14314
changelog: [`map_entry`]: fix a false positive where the lint would
trigger without any insert calls present
changelog: [`manual_abs_diff`]: Initial implementation
Hey, first time writing a new lint for clippy, hope I got it right. I
think it's pretty self-explanatory!
Added a few `fixme` test cases, where the lint can be improved to catch
more (probably rare) patterns, but opening a PR with this initial
implementation to make sure I'm on the right track, and that this lint
is acceptable at all.
😁
We do not want to remove casts done inside macros. Also, when printing
the suggestion, take it from the same context as the origin expression
(the root context).
Problems found while working on #14526, but should be merged even if
#14526 is not.
changelog: none
This PR fixes issues with the `missing_asserts_for_indexing` lint.
- false positive when the first index is the highest(or equal) value in
a list of indexes:
```rust
pub fn foo(slice: &[i32]) -> i32{
slice[1] * slice[0]
}
```
- false negative when an assert statement if found after the indexing
operation.
```rust
pub fn bar(slice: &[i32]) -> i32 {
let product = slice[0] * slice[1];
assert!(slice.len() > 1);
product
}
```
examples: https://godbolt.org/z/s7Y47vKdEcloses: #14079
changelog: [`missing_asserts_for_indexing`]: ignore asserts found after
indexing, and do not require asserts if the first index is highest.
`unsafe_fields` is an incomplete feature; comments have been put near
`#![expect(incomplete_features)]` to ensure that we revisit the
situation when the feature becomes complete.
We do not want to remove casts done inside macros. Also, when printing
the suggestion, take it from the same context as the origin expression
(the root context).
Having a macro call as the scrutinee is supported. However, the proposed
suggestion must use the macro call itself, not its expansion.
When the scrutinee is a macro call, do not complain about an irrefutable
match, as the user may not be aware of the result of the macro. A
comparaison will be suggested instead, as if we couldn't see the outcome
of the macro.
Similarly, do not accept macro calls as arm patterns.
changelog: [`single_match`]: proper suggestions in presence of macros
Fixes#14493
These method chains can be expressed concisely with `if` / `else`.
changelog: [`obfuscated_if_else`]: support `then().unwrap_or_default()`
and `then_some().unwrap_or_default()`
Having a macro call as the scrutinee is supported. However, the proposed
suggestion must use the macro call itself, not its expansion.
When the scrutinee is a macro call, do not complain about an irrefutable
match, as the user may not be aware of the result of the macro. A
comparaison will be suggested instead, as if we couldn't see the outcome
of the macro.
Similarly, do not accept macro calls as arm patterns.
Blocks created by desugaring will not contain an explicit `return`. Do not
suggest to add it when the user has no control over the desugared code.
Also, in the case of an implicit return on a `.await` expression, ensure
that the suggested `return` is emitted at the right place instead of
before the `await` keyword.
Until `if let` chains are stabilized, we do not collapse them together
or with other `if` expressions unless the `let_chains` feature is
enabled. This is the case for example in Clippy sources.
This was made possible by converting the `collapsible_if` to a late lint
to get access to the set of enabled features. This allows this PR to
supersede #14455 and no longer require an additional configuration
option.
The three commits are, in order:
- a conversion of the existing early lint to a late lint, with no new
feature or tests changes
- the addition of the `let_chains` feature detection and action, and
tests
- the application of the enhanced lint to Clippy sources (136 files
modified)
changelog: [`collapsible_if`]: recognize the rust compiler `let_chains`
feature
r? @flip1995
The `unnecessary_filter_map` and `unnecessary_find_map` lints were
making partial suggestions, proposing to replace the whole expression by
only the method name, or a subexpression which contained explicit
placeholders.
Since even `MaybeIncorrect` suggestions must generate code that
compiles, this changes those lints to recommandation lints with no
code suggestion.
Until `if let` chains are stabilized, we do not collapse them together
or with other `if` expressions unless the `let_chains` feature is
enabled. This is the case for example in Clippy sources.
When lowering a destructuring assignment from AST to HIR, the compiler
will reuse the same identifier name (namely `sym::lhs`) for all the
fields. The desugaring must be checked for to avoid a false positive of
the `shadow_unrelated` lint.
Fix#10279Fix#14377
changelog: [`shadow_unrelated`]: prevent false positive in destructuring
assignments
When lowering a destructuring assignment from AST to HIR, the compiler
will reuse the same identifier name (namely `sym::lhs`) for all the
fields. The desugaring must be checked for to avoid a false positive
of the `shadow_unrelated` lint.
Dereferencing string literals in suggestions is redundant.
changelog: [`cmp_owned`]: more natural suggestions are provided for
string literals now
fixes#8103
This extra condition prevents a problem when removing the '}' in:
```rust
( // There was an opening bracket after the parenthesis, which has been removed
// This is a comment
})
```
Removing the whitespaces, including the linefeed, before the '}', would put the
closing parenthesis at the end of the `// This is a comment` line, which would
make it part of the comment as well. In this case, it is best to keep the span
on the '}' alone.
Both lints share a lot of characteristics but were implemented in
unrelated ways. This unifies them, saving around 100 SLOC in the
process, and making one more test trigger the lint. Also, this removes
useless blocks in suggestions.
