Fix#56806 by using `delay_span_bug` in object safety layout sanity checks
It's possible that `is_object_safe` is called on a trait method that with an invalid receiver type. This caused an ICE in #56806, because `receiver_is_dispatchable` returns `true` for `self: Box<dyn Trait>`, which causes one of the layout sanity checks in object_safety.rs to fail. Replacing `bug!` with `delay_span_bug` solves this.
The fact that `receiver_is_dispatchable` returns `true` here could be considered a bug. It passes the check that the method implements, though: `Box<dyn Trait>` implements `DispatchFromDyn<Box<dyn Trait>>` because `dyn Trait` implements `Unsize<dyn Trait>`. It would be good to hear what @eddyb and @nikomatsakis think.
Note that I only added a test for the case encountered in #56806. I could not come up with a case that triggered an ICE from the other check, `bug!("receiver when Self = dyn Trait should be ScalarPair, found Scalar")`. There is no way, to my knowledge, that you can make `receiver_is_dispatchable` return true but still have a `Scalar` ABI when `Self = dyn Trait`.
One other case I encountered while debugging #56806 was that if you have a type parameter `T` that implements `Deref<Target=Self>` and `DispatchFromDyn<T>`, and use it as a method receiver, it will cause an ICE during `is_object_safe` because `T` has no layout ([playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=d9b7497b3be0ca8382fa7d9497263214)):
```rust
trait Trait<T: Deref<Target=Self> + DispatchFromDyn<T>> {
fn foo(self: T) -> dyn Trait<T>;
}
```
I don't intend to remove the ICE there because it is a pathological case, especially since there is no way to implement `DispatchFromDyn<T>` for `T` — the checks in typeck/coherence/builtin.rs do not allow that.
fixes#56806
r? @varkor
NLL: Add closure cannot be moved note.
Fixes#57098.
This PR extends existing logic for checking whether a closure that
is `FnOnce` and therefore moves variables that it captures from the
environment has already been invoked when being invoked again.
Now, this logic will also check whether the closure is being moved after
previously being moved or invoked and add an appropriate note.
r? @pnkfelix
Add support for trait-objects without a principal
The hard-error version of #56481 - should be merged after we do something about the `traitobject` crate.
Fixes#33140.
Fixes#57057.
r? @nikomatsakis
Implement the Re-rebalance coherence RFC
This is the first time I touch anything in the compiler so just tell me if I got something wrong.
Big thanks to @sgrif for the pointers where to look for those things.
cc #55437
It's possible that `is_object_safe` is called on a trait that is ill-formed, and we shouldn't ICE unless there are no errors being raised. Using `delay_span_bug` solves this.
fixes#56806
make `panictry!` private to libsyntax
This commit completely removes usage of the `panictry!` macro from
outside libsyntax. The macro causes parse errors to be fatal, so using
it in libsyntax_ext caused parse failures *within* a syntax extension to
be fatal, which is probably not intended.
Furthermore, this commit adds spans to diagnostics emitted by empty
extensions if they were missing, à la #56491.
Universes
This PR transitions the compiler to use **universes** instead of the **leak-check**. It is marked as [WIP] for a few reasons:
- The diagnostics at present are terrible =)
- This changes the behavior of coherence, regressing some things that used to compile
The goals of this PR at present are:
- To start getting some eyes on the code
- To do a crater run
- To see the full travis results (due to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52452, I am not able to run the full test suite locally anymore at present)
The first few commits in the PR are changing how `evaluate` treats regions. We now track whether region comparisons occurred, reverting the "staticized" query approach that @arielb1 put in. The problem with "staticized" queries is that it relied on the leak-check to get higher-ranked things correct, and we are removing the leak-check in this PR series, so that caused problems.
You can see at the end a collection of test updates. Mostly we behave the same but with atrocious diagnostics, but there are a number of cases where we used to error and now no longer do, as well as single case where we used to **not** error but we now do (the coherence-subtyping change).
(Note: it would be possible to do a version of leak-check that propagates universe information and recover the old behavior. I am reluctant to do so because I'd like to leave us room to get more precise -- e.g., I want to eventually handle things like `exists<'a> { for<'b> { if ('a: 'b) { 'a: 'b } } }` which presently the leak-check cannot cope with etc. Also because it seems more consistent to me: most folks I've talked to expect the new behavior and are surprised to learn that binding sites were so significant before when it comes to coherence. One question is, though, to what extent are people relying on this in the wild?)
When we coerce `dyn Foo` to `dyn Bar`, that is OK as long as `Foo` is
usable in all contexts where `Bar` is usable (hence using the source
must be a subtype of the target).
This is needed for the universe-based code to handle
`old-lub-glb-object`; that test used to work sort of by accident
before with the old code.
Previously, evaluation ignored outlives relationships. Since we using
evaluation to skip the "normal" trait selection (which enforces
outlives relationships) this led to incorrect results in some cases.
This commit completely removes usage of the `panictry!` macro from
outside libsyntax. The macro causes parse errors to be fatal, so using
it in libsyntax_ext caused parse failures *within* a syntax extension to
be fatal, which is probably not intended.
Furthermore, this commit adds spans to diagnostics emitted by empty
extensions if they were missing, à la #56491.
Improve type mismatch error messages
Closes#56115.
Replace "integral variable" with "integer" and replace "floating-point variable" with "floating-point number" to make the message less confusing.
TODO the book and clippy needs to be changed accordingly later.
r? @varkor
NLL: User type annotations refactor, associated constant patterns and ref bindings.
Fixes#55511 and Fixes#55401. Contributes to #54943.
This PR performs a large refactoring on user type annotations, checks user type annotations for associated constants in patterns and that user type annotations for `ref` bindings are respected.
r? @nikomatsakis
resolve: Simplify treatment of ambiguity errors
If we have a glob conflict like this
```rust
mod m1 { struct S; }
mod m2 { struct S; }
use m1::*;
use m2::*;
```
we treat it as a special "ambiguity item" that's not an error by itself, but produces an error when actually used.
```rust
use m1::*; // primary
use m2::*; // secondary
=>
ambiguity S(m1::S, m2::S);
```
Ambiguity items were *sometimes* treated as their primary items for error recovery, but pretty irregularly.
After this PR they are always treated as their primary items, except that
- If an ambiguity item is marked as used, then it still produces an error.
- Ambiguity items are still filtered away when exported to other crates (which is also a use in some sense).
privacy: Use common `DefId` visiting infrastructure for all privacy visitors
One repeating pattern in privacy checking is going through a type, visiting all `DefId`s inside it and doing something with them.
This is the case because visibilities and reachabilities are attached to `DefId`s.
Previously various privacy visitors visited types slightly differently using their own methods, with most recently written `TypePrivacyVisitor` being the "gold standard".
This mostly worked okay, but differences could manifest in overly conservative reachability analysis, some errors being reported twice, some private-in-public lints (not errors) being wrongly reported or not reported.
This PR does something that I wanted to do since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/32674#discussion_r58291608 - factoring out the common visiting logic!
Now all the common logic is contained in `struct DefIdVisitorSkeleton`, with specific privacy visitors deciding only what to do with visited `DefId`s (via `trait DefIdVisitor`).
A bunch of cleanups is also applied in the process.
This area is somewhat tricky due to lots of easily miss-able details, but thankfully it's was well covered by tests in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/46083 and previous PRs, so I'm relatively sure in the refactoring correctness.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/56837#discussion_r241962239 in particular.
Also this will help with implementing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48054.
