Using `Vec::extend(std::iter::repeat_n(item, N))` allows to use the more
natural number of elements to add `N`, as is probably done in the
original loop, instead of computing the difference between the existing
number of elements and the wanted one.
Before MSRV 1.82, the older suggestion to use `Vec::resize()` is still
issued.
Inspired by #6156 (which predates `repeat_n()`).
changelog: [`same_item_push`]: recommend using `Vec::extend()` to extend
a vector
Using `Vec::extend(std::iter::repeat_n(item, N))` allows to use the more
natural number of elements to add `N`, as is probably done in the original
loop, instead of computing the difference between the existing number of
elements and the wanted one.
Before MSRV 1.82, the older suggestion to use `Vec::resize()` is still
issued.
Fixes#11846.
This PR has three commits:
- The first commit adds an `initializer-suggestions` configuration to
control suggestion applicability when initializers are present. The
following are the options:
- "none": do not suggest
- "maybe-incorrect": suggest, but do not apply suggestions with `--fix`
- "machine-applicable": suggest and apply suggestions with `--fix`
- The second commit fixes suggestions to handle field attributes
(problem [noticed by
@samueltardieu](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/13737#discussion_r1859261645)).
- The third commit adds `initializer-suggestions = "machine-applicable"`
to Clippy's `clippy.toml` and applies the suggestions. (Nothing seems to
break.)
---
changelog: make `inconsistent_struct_constructor` "all fields are
shorthand" requirement configurable
Add support for `#[clippy::format_args]` attribute that can be attached to any macro to indicate that it functions the same as the built-in format macros like `format!`, `println!` and `write!`
new lint: `source_item_ordering`
changelog: [`source_item_ordering`]: Introduced a new restriction lint that checks the ordering of items in Modules, Enums, Structs, Impls and Traits.
From the written documentation:
> Why restrict this?
> Keeping a consistent ordering throughout the codebase helps with working as a team, and possibly improves maintainability of the codebase. The idea is that by defining a consistent and enforceable rule for how source files are structured, less time will be wasted during reviews on a topic that is (under most circumstances) not relevant to the logic implemented in the code. Sometimes this will be referred to as "bike-shedding".
>
> Keep in mind, that ordering source code alphabetically can lead to reduced performance in cases where the most commonly used enum variant isn't the first entry anymore, and similar optimizations that can reduce branch misses, cache locality and such. Either don't use this lint if that's relevant, or disable the lint in modules or items specifically where it matters. Other solutions can be to use profile guided optimization (PGO), or other advanced optimization methods.
I tried to build it as configurable as possible, as such a highly opinionated lint should be adjustable to personal opinions.
I'm open to any input and will be available both here and on the zulip for communication. In the meantime I'll be testing this lint against my own code-bases, which I've (manually) kept ordered with the default config, to see how well it works in practice.
And lastly, a big thanks to the community for making clippy the best linter there is!
This lint checks for code that looks like
```rust
let something : Vec<_> = (0..100).map(|_| {
1 + 2 + 3
}).collect();
```
which is more clear as
```rust
let something : Vec<_> = std::iter::repeat_with(|| {
1 + 2 + 3
}).take(100).collect();
```
or
```rust
let something : Vec<_> =
std::iter::repeat_n(1 + 2 + 3, 100)
.collect();
```
That is, a map over a range which does nothing with the parameter
passed to it is simply a function (or closure) being called `n`
times and could be more semantically expressed using `take`.
Add units/unit prefixes of frequency to doc-valid-idents
These units/unit prefixes often come up in the embedded world.
Should this PR also modify the `test_units` test? It seems only concerned with data units currently; should it also test frequency units?
changelog: [`doc_markdown`]: Add MHz, GHz, and THz to `doc-valid-idents`.
