Implement the Re-rebalance coherence RFC
This is the first time I touch anything in the compiler so just tell me if I got something wrong.
Big thanks to @sgrif for the pointers where to look for those things.
cc #55437
make `panictry!` private to libsyntax
This commit completely removes usage of the `panictry!` macro from
outside libsyntax. The macro causes parse errors to be fatal, so using
it in libsyntax_ext caused parse failures *within* a syntax extension to
be fatal, which is probably not intended.
Furthermore, this commit adds spans to diagnostics emitted by empty
extensions if they were missing, à la #56491.
This commit completely removes usage of the `panictry!` macro from
outside libsyntax. The macro causes parse errors to be fatal, so using
it in libsyntax_ext caused parse failures *within* a syntax extension to
be fatal, which is probably not intended.
Furthermore, this commit adds spans to diagnostics emitted by empty
extensions if they were missing, à la #56491.
Implement RFC 2338, "Type alias enum variants"
This PR implements [RFC 2338](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2338), allowing one to write code like the following.
```rust
#![feature(type_alias_enum_variants)]
enum Foo {
Bar(i32),
Baz { i: i32 },
}
type Alias = Foo;
fn main() {
let t = Alias::Bar(0);
let t = Alias::Baz { i: 0 };
match t {
Alias::Bar(_i) => {}
Alias::Baz { i: _i } => {}
}
}
```
Since `Self` can be considered a type alias in this context, it also enables using `Self::Variant` as both a constructor and pattern.
Fixes issues #56199 and #56611.
N.B., after discussing the syntax for type arguments on enum variants with @petrochenkov and @eddyb (there are also a few comments on the [tracking issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49683)), the consensus seems to be treat the syntax as follows, which ought to be backwards-compatible.
```rust
Option::<u8>::None; // OK
Option::None::<u8>; // OK, but lint in near future (hard error next edition?)
Alias::<u8>::None; // OK
Alias::None::<u8>; // Error
```
I do not know if this will need an FCP, but let's start one if so.
Resolve `$crate`s for pretty-printing at more appropriate time
Doing it in `BuildReducedGraphVisitor` wasn't a good idea, identifiers wasn't actually visited half of the time.
As a result some `$crate`s weren't resolved and were therefore pretty-printed as `$crate` literally, which turns into two tokens during re-parsing of the pretty-printed text.
Now we are visiting and resolving `$crate` identifiers in an item right before sending that item to a proc macro attribute or derive.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57089
Remove `TokenStream::JointTree`.
This is done by adding a new `IsJoint` field to `TokenStream::Tree`,
which simplifies a lot of `match` statements. And likewise for
`CursorKind`.
The commit also adds a new method `TokenTree:stream()` which can replace
a choice between `.into()` and `.joint()`.
Fix stabilization version numbers (exhaustive_integer_patterns + macro_literal_matcher)
+ `exhaustive_integer_patterns` slipped 1.32; merged in 1.33 -- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/56362
+ `macro_literal_matcher` isn't stable on current stable (1.31) but is on beta (1.32).
r? @varkor
Rework treatment of `$crate` in procedural macros
Important clarification: `$crate` below means "processed `$crate`" or "output `$crate`". In the input of a decl macro `$crate` is just two separate tokens, but in the *output of a decl macro* `$crate` is a single keyword identifier (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/55640#issuecomment-435692791).
First of all, this PR removes the `eliminate_crate_var` hack.
`$crate::foo` is no longer replaced with `::foo` or `::crate_name::foo` in the input of derive proc macros, it's passed to the macro instead with its precise span and hygiene data, and can be treated as any other path segment keyword (like `crate` or `self`) after that. (Note: `eliminate_crate_var` was never used for non-derive proc macros.)
This creates an annoying problem - derive macros still may stringify their input before processing and expect `$crate` survive that stringification and refer to the same crate (the Rust 1.15-1.29 way of doing things).
Moreover, the input of proc macro attributes and derives (but not fn-like proc macros) also effectively survives stringification before being passed to the macro (also for legacy implementation reasons).
So we kind of resurrect the `eliminate_crate_var` hack in reduced form, but apply it only to AST pretty-printing.
If an AST fragment is pretty-printed, the resulting *text* will have `$crate` replaced with `crate` or `::crate_name`. This should be enough to keep all the legacy cases working.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/55640
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56622
r? @ghost
This is done by adding a new `IsJoint` field to `TokenStream::Tree`,
which simplifies a lot of `match` statements. And likewise for
`CursorKind`.
The commit also adds a new method `TokenTree:stream()` which can replace
a choice between `.into()` and `.joint()`.
