lint: convert incoherent_fundamental_impls into hard error
*Summary for affected authors:* If your crate depends on one of the following crates, please upgrade to a newer version:
- gtk-rs: upgrade to at least 0.4
- rusqlite: upgrade to at least 0.14
- nalgebra: upgrade to at least 0.15, or the last patch version of 0.14
- spade: upgrade or refresh the Cargo.lock file to use version 1.7
- imageproc: upgrade to at least 0.16 (newer versions no longer use nalgebra)
implement #46205
r? @nikomatsakis
Checking generic args after late bound region err.
Fixes#60622.
This PR fixes an ICE that occurs when a late bound region error is
emitted and that resulted in the rest of the generic arguments of a
function not being checked.
For example, you could specify a generic type parameter `T` in a function
call `foo<'_, T>()` to a function that doesn't have a generic type
parameter.
Since an error wasn't emitted from the function, compilation
continued to parts of typeck that didn't expect a generic type argument
in a call for a function that didn't have any generic type arguments.
This commit fixes an ICE that occurs when a late bound region error is
emitted and that resulted in the rest of the generic arguments of a
function not being checked.
For example, you could specify a generic type parameter `T` in a function
call `foo<'_, T>()` to a function that doesn't have a generic type
parameter.
Since an error wasn't emitted from the function, compilation
continued to parts of typeck that didn't expect a generic type argument
in a call for a function that didn't have any generic type arguments.
Include expression to wait for to the span of Await
Currently the span of `await!` only includes itself:
```rust
await!(3);
// ^^^^^
```
This PR changes it so that the span holds the whole `await!` expression:
```rust
await!(3);
// ^^^^^^^^^
Remove bitrig support from rust
Resolves#60743
using `find` and `rg` I delete every occurence of "bitrig" in the sources, expect for the llvm submodule (is this correct?).
There's also this file 5b8e99bb61/rls-analysis/test_data/rust-analysis/libstd-af9bacceee784405.json which contains a bitrig string in it. What to do with that?
default to $ARCH-apple-macosx10.7.0 LLVM triple for darwin targets
Over in #60378, we made `rustc` switch LLVM target triples dynamically
based on the `MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET` environment variable. This
change was made to align with `clang`'s behavior, and therefore make
cross-language LTO feasible on OS X. Otherwise, `rustc` would produce
LLVM bitcode files with a target triple of `x86_64-apple-darwin`,
`clang` would produce LLVM bitcode files with a target triple of
`x86_64-apple-macosx$VERSION`, and the linker would complain.
This change worked fine, except for one corner case: if you didn't have
`MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET` set, and you wanted to do LTO on just Rust
code, you'd get warning messages similar to:
```
warning: Linking two modules of different target triples: ' is 'x86_64-apple-macosx10.7.0' whereas 'main.7rcbfp3g-cgu.4' is 'x86_64-apple-darwin'
```
This message occurs because libstd is compiled with
`MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET` set to 10.7. The LLVM bitcode distributed in
libstd's rlibs, then, is tagged with the target triple of
`x86_64-apple-macosx10.7.0`, while the bitcode `rustc` produces for
"user" code is tagged with the target triple of `x86_64-apple-darwin`.
It's not good to have LTO on just Rust code (probably much more common
than cross-language LTO) warn by default. These warnings also break
Cargo's testsuite.
This change defaults to acting as though `MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET` was
set to 10.7. "user" code will then be given a target triple that is
equivalent to the target triple libstd bitcode is already using. The
above warning will therefore go away.
`rustc` already assumes that compiling without
`MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET` means that we're compiling for a target
compatible with OS X 10.7 (e.g. that things like TLS work properly). So
this change is really just making things conform more closely to the
status quo.
(It's also worth noting that before and after this patch, compiling with
`MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET` set to, say, 10.9, works just fine: target
triples with an "apple" version ignore OS versions when checking
compatibility, so bitcode with a `x86_64-apple-macosx10.7.0` triple works just
fine with bitcode with a `x86_64-apple-macosx10.9.0` triple.)
forego caching for all participants in cycles, apart from root node
This is a targeted fix for #60010, which uncovered a pretty bad failure of our caching strategy in the face of coinductive cycles. The problem is explained in the comment in the PR on the new field, `in_cycle`, but I'll reproduce it here:
> Starts out as false -- if, during evaluation, we encounter a
> cycle, then we will set this flag to true for all participants
> in the cycle (apart from the "head" node). These participants
> will then forego caching their results. This is not the most
> efficient solution, but it addresses #60010. The problem we
> are trying to prevent:
>
> - If you have `A: AutoTrait` requires `B: AutoTrait` and `C: NonAutoTrait`
> - `B: AutoTrait` requires `A: AutoTrait` (coinductive cycle, ok)
> - `C: NonAutoTrait` requires `A: AutoTrait` (non-coinductive cycle, not ok)
>
> you don't want to cache that `B: AutoTrait` or `A: AutoTrait`
> is `EvaluatedToOk`; this is because they were only considered
> ok on the premise that if `A: AutoTrait` held, but we indeed
> encountered a problem (later on) with `A: AutoTrait. So we
> currently set a flag on the stack node for `B: AutoTrait` (as
> well as the second instance of `A: AutoTrait`) to supress
> caching.
>
> This is a simple, targeted fix. The correct fix requires
> deeper changes, but would permit more caching: we could
> basically defer caching until we have fully evaluated the
> tree, and then cache the entire tree at once.
I'm not sure what the impact of this fix will be in terms of existing crates or performance: we were accepting incorrect code before, so there will perhaps be some regressions, and we are now caching less.
As the comment above notes, we could do a lot better than this fix, but that would involve more invasive rewrites. I thought it best to start with something simple.
r? @pnkfelix -- but let's do crater/perf run
cc @arielb1
Over in #60378, we made `rustc` switch LLVM target triples dynamically
based on the `MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET` environment variable. This
change was made to align with `clang`'s behavior, and therefore make
cross-language LTO feasible on OS X. Otherwise, `rustc` would produce
LLVM bitcode files with a target triple of `x86_64-apple-darwin`,
`clang` would produce LLVM bitcode files with a target triple of
`x86_64-apple-macosx$VERSION`, and the linker would complain.
This change worked fine, except for one corner case: if you didn't have
`MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET` set, and you wanted to do LTO on just Rust
code, you'd get warning messages similar to:
```
warning: Linking two modules of different target triples: ' is 'x86_64-apple-macosx10.7.0' whereas 'main.7rcbfp3g-cgu.4' is 'x86_64-apple-darwin'
```
This message occurs because libstd is compiled with
`MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET` set to 10.7. The LLVM bitcode distributed in
libstd's rlibs, then, is tagged with the target triple of
`x86_64-apple-macosx10.7.0`, while the bitcode `rustc` produces for
"user" code is tagged with the target triple of `x86_64-apple-darwin`.
It's not good to have LTO on just Rust code (probably much more common
than cross-language LTO) warn by default. These warnings also break
Cargo's testsuite.
This change defaults to acting as though `MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET` was
set to 10.7. "user" code will then be given a target triple that is
equivalent to the target triple libstd bitcode is already using. The
above warning will therefore go away.
`rustc` already assumes that compiling without
`MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET` means that we're compiling for a target
compatible with OS X 10.7 (e.g. that things like TLS work properly). So
this change is really just making things conform more closely to the
status quo.
(It's also worth noting that before and after this patch, compiling with
`MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET` set to, say, 10.9, works just fine: target
triples with an "apple" version ignore OS versions when checking
compatibility, so bitcode with a `x86_64-apple-macosx10.7.0` triple works just
fine with bitcode with a `x86_64-apple-macosx10.9.0` triple.)
Add #[doc(hidden)] attribute on compiler generated module.
Resolves unavoidable `missing_docs` warning/error on proc-macro crates.
Resolves#42008.
Changes not yet tested locally, however I wanted to submit first since `rustc` takes forever to compile.
Use `Symbol` more
A `Symbol` can be equated with a string (e.g. `&str`). This involves a
TLS lookup to get the chars (and a Mutex lock in a parallel compiler)
and then a char-by-char comparison. This functionality is convenient but
avoids one of the main benefits of `Symbol`s, which is fast equality
comparisons.
This PR removes the `Symbol`/string equality operations, forcing a lot
of existing string occurrences to become `Symbol`s. Fortunately, these
are almost all static strings (many are attribute names) and we can add
static `Symbol`s as necessary, and very little extra interning occurs.
The benefits are (a) a slight speedup (possibly greater in a parallel
compiler), and (b) the code is a lot more principled about `Symbol` use.
The main downside is verbosity, particularly with more `use
syntax::symbol::symbols` items.
r? @Zoxc
Keep original literal tokens in AST
The original literal tokens (`token::Lit`) are kept in AST until lowering to HIR.
The tokens are kept together with their lowered "semantic" representation (`ast::LitKind`), so the size of `ast::Lit` is increased (this also increases the size of meta-item structs used for processing built-in attributes).
However, the size of `ast::Expr` stays the same.
The intent is to remove the "semantic" representation from AST eventually and keep literals as tokens until lowering to HIR (at least), and I'm going to work on that, but it would be good to land this sooner to unblock progress on the [lexer refactoring](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/59706).
Fixes a part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/43081 (literal tokens that are passed to proc macros are always precise, including hexadecimal numbers, strings with their original escaping, etc)
Fixes a part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/60495 (everything except for proc macro API doesn't need escaping anymore)
This also allows to eliminate a certain hack from the lexer (https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/pretty-printing.20comments/near/165005357).
cc @matklad
Make tests compatible with musl host
As an alternative to passing explicit linker all over the place I could try linking `cc` to musl gcc since this bootstraps itself.
Assigning for discussion:
r? @alexcrichton
