Support HIR wf checking for function signatures
During function type-checking, we normalize any associated types in
the function signature (argument types + return type), and then
create WF obligations for each of the normalized types. The HIR wf code
does not currently support this case, so any errors that we get have
imprecise spans.
This commit extends `ObligationCauseCode::WellFormed` to support
recording a function parameter, allowing us to get the corresponding
HIR type if an error occurs. Function typechecking is modified to
pass this information during signature normalization and WF checking.
The resulting code is fairly verbose, due to the fact that we can
no longer normalize the entire signature with a single function call.
As part of the refactoring, we now perform HIR-based WF checking
for several other 'typed items' (statics, consts, and inherent impls).
As a result, WF and projection errors in a function signature now
have a precise span, which points directly at the responsible type.
If a function signature is constructed via a macro, this will allow
the error message to point at the code 'most responsible' for the error
(e.g. a user-supplied macro argument).
During function type-checking, we normalize any associated types in
the function signature (argument types + return type), and then
create WF obligations for each of the normalized types. The HIR wf code
does not currently support this case, so any errors that we get have
imprecise spans.
This commit extends `ObligationCauseCode::WellFormed` to support
recording a function parameter, allowing us to get the corresponding
HIR type if an error occurs. Function typechecking is modified to
pass this information during signature normalization and WF checking.
The resulting code is fairly verbose, due to the fact that we can
no longer normalize the entire signature with a single function call.
As part of the refactoring, we now perform HIR-based WF checking
for several other 'typed items' (statics, consts, and inherent impls).
As a result, WF and projection errors in a function signature now
have a precise span, which points directly at the responsible type.
If a function signature is constructed via a macro, this will allow
the error message to point at the code 'most responsible' for the error
(e.g. a user-supplied macro argument).
* Always point at macros, including derive macros
* Point at non-local items that introduce a trait requirement
* On private associated item, point at definition
Improve error reporting for modifications behind `&` references
I had a look at #84210 and noticed that #85823 has effectively already fixed#84210.
However, the string matching in #85823 is _very_ crude and already breaks down when a variable name starts with `mut`. I have made this a bit more robust; further improvements could definitely be made but are complicated by the lack of information provided by an earlier pass:
ce331ee6ee/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/matches/mod.rs (L2103-L2107)
I have also fixed a missing comma in the error message.
Fix use placement for suggestions near main.
This fixes an edge case for the suggestion to add a `use`. When running with `--test`, the `main` function will be annotated with an `#[allow(dead_code)]` attribute. The `UsePlacementFinder` would end up using the dummy span of that synthetic attribute. If there are top-level inner attributes, this would place the `use` in the wrong position. The solution here is to ignore attributes with dummy spans.
In the process of working on this, I discovered that the `use_suggestion_placement` test was broken. `UsePlacementFinder` is unaware of active attributes. Attributes like `#[derive]` don't exist in the AST since they are removed. Fixing that is difficult, since the AST does not retain enough information. I considered trying to place the `use` towards the top of the module after any `extern crate` items, but I couldn't find a way to get a span for the start of a module block (the `mod` span starts at the `mod` keyword, and it seems tricky to find the spot just after the opening bracket and past inner attributes). For now, I just put some comments about the issue. This appears to have been a known issue in #44215 where the test for it was introduced, and the fix seemed to be deferred to later.
Better errors for Debug and Display traits
Currently, if someone tries to pass value that does not implement `Debug` or `Display` to a formatting macro, they get a very verbose and confusing error message. This PR changes the error messages for missing `Debug` and `Display` impls to be less overwhelming in this case, as suggested by #85844. I was a little less aggressive in changing the error message than that issue proposed. Still, this implementation would be enough to reduce the number of messages to be much more manageable.
After this PR, information on the cause of an error involving a `Debug` or `Display` implementation would suppressed if the requirement originated within a standard library macro. My reasoning was that errors originating from within a macro are confusing when they mention details that the programmer can't see, and this is particularly problematic for `Debug` and `Display`, which are most often used via macros. It is possible that either a broader or a narrower criterion would be better. I'm quite open to any feedback.
Fixes#85844.
Do not suggest to add type annotations for unnameable types
Consider this example:
```rust
const A = || 42;
struct S<T> { t: T }
const B: _ = S { t: || 42 };
```
This currently produces the following output:
```
error: missing type for `const` item
--> src/lib.rs:1:7
|
1 | const A = || 42;
| ^ help: provide a type for the item: `A: [closure@src/lib.rs:1:11: 1:16]`
error[E0121]: the type placeholder `_` is not allowed within types on item signatures
--> src/lib.rs:4:10
|
4 | const B: _ = S { t: || 42 };
| ^
| |
| not allowed in type signatures
| help: replace `_` with the correct type: `S<[closure@src/lib.rs:4:21: 4:26]>`
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
```
However, these suggestions are obviously useless, because the suggested types cannot be written down. With my changes, the suggestion is replaced with a note, because there is no simple fix:
```
error: missing type for `const` item
--> test.rs:1:7
|
1 | const A = || 42;
| ^
|
note: however, the inferred type `[closure@test.rs:1:11: 1:16]` cannot be named
--> test.rs:1:11
|
1 | const A = || 42;
| ^^^^^
error[E0121]: the type placeholder `_` is not allowed within types on item signatures
--> test.rs:4:10
|
4 | const B: _ = S { t: || 42 };
| ^ not allowed in type signatures
|
note: however, the inferred type `S<[closure@test.rs:4:21: 4:26]>` cannot be named
--> test.rs:4:14
|
4 | const B: _ = S { t: || 42 };
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
```
don't suggest unsized indirection in where-clauses
Skip where-clauses when suggesting using indirection in combination with
`?Sized` bounds on type parameters.
Fixes#85943.
`@estebank` I think this doesn't conflict with your work in #85947; please let me know if you'd like me to cherry pick it to a new branch based on yours instead.
Adjust self-type check to require equality
When we encounter `SomeType::<X>::foo`, `self_ty` is `SomeType<X>` and the method is defined in an impl on `SomeType<A>`. Previously, we required simply that `self_ty <: impl_ty`, but this is too lax: we should require equality in order to use the method. This was found as part of unrelated work on never type stabilization, but also fixes one of the wf test cases.
Fix missing lifetimes diagnostics after #83759
In #83759 while rebasing I didn't realize there was a new function for suggesting to add lifetime arguments. It relied on some invariants, namely that if a generic type/trait has angle brackets then it must have some generic argument, which is now no longer true. This PR updates that function to handle the new invariants.
This also adds a new regression test but I'm not sure if that's the correct place for it.
Fixes#85347
Implement the new desugaring from `try_trait_v2`
~~Currently blocked on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84782, which has a PR in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/84811~~ Rebased atop that fix.
`try_trait_v2` tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84277
Unfortunately this is already touching a ton of things, so if you have suggestions for good ways to split it up, I'd be happy to hear them. (The combination between the use in the library, the compiler changes, the corresponding diagnostic differences, even MIR tests mean that I don't really have a great plan for it other than trying to have decently-readable commits.
r? `@ghost`
~~(This probably shouldn't go in during the last week before the fork anyway.)~~ Fork happened.
Add test for suggestion to borrow unsized function parameters
Closes#82820.
This is a regression test for #82820.
This test case is included in more general tests, but I think the error
regressed because there were a bunch of other diagnostic changes in the
test that obscured this regression.
Hopefully, having a test specific to the suggestion, and running rustfix
for the test, will prevent this error from regressing in the future.
This is a regression test for #82820.
This test case is included in more general tests, but I think the error
regressed because there were a bunch of other diagnostic changes in the
test that obscured this regression.
Hopefully, having a test specific to the suggestion, and running rustfix
for the test, will prevent this error from regressing in the future.
Update BARE_TRAIT_OBJECT and ELLIPSIS_INCLUSIVE_RANGE_PATTERNS to errors in Rust 2021
This addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/81244 by updating two lints to errors in the Rust 2021 edition.
r? `@estebank`
