When taking the address of an unsized field we generate a rvalue datum
for the field and then convert it to an lvalue datum. At that point,
cleanup is scheduled for the field, leading to multiple drop calls.
The problem is that we generate an rvalue datum for the field, since the
pointer does not own the data and there's already cleanup scheduled
elsewhere by the true owner. Instead, an lvalue datum must be created.
Thanks to @eddyb for identifying the underlying cause and suggesting the
correct fix.
Fixes#25549Fixes#25515
Fixes#23968.
Since the values are stored in a u64 internally, we need to be mask away the
high bits after applying the ! operator. Otherwise, these bits will be set to
one, causing overflow.
Since the values are stored in a u64 internally, we need to be mask away the
high bits after applying the ! operator. Otherwise, these bits will be set to
one, causing overflow.
This allows compiling entire crates from memory or preprocessing source files before they are tokenized.
Minor API refactoring included, which is a [breaking-change] for libsyntax users:
* `ParseSess::{next_node_id, reserve_node_ids}` moved to rustc's `Session`
* `new_parse_sess` -> `ParseSess::new`
* `new_parse_sess_special_handler` -> `ParseSess::with_span_handler`
* `mk_span_handler` -> `SpanHandler::new`
* `default_handler` -> `Handler::new`
* `mk_handler` -> `Handler::with_emitter`
* `string_to_filemap(sess source, path)` -> `sess.codemap().new_filemap(path, source)`
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 1040][rfc] which is a redesign of the
currently-unstable `Duration` type. The API of the type has been scaled back to
be more conservative and it also no longer supports negative durations.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1040-duration-reform.md
The inner `duration` module of the `time` module has now been hidden (as
`Duration` is reexported) and the feature name for this type has changed from
`std_misc` to `duration`. All APIs accepting durations have also been audited to
take a more flavorful feature name instead of `std_misc`.
Closes#24874
This also updates the error messages for both. For E0066, it removes mention
of "managed heap", which was removed in 8a91d33. For E0069, I just tweaked
the wording to make it a bit more explicit.
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 1040][rfc] which is a redesign of the
currently-unstable `Duration` type. The API of the type has been scaled back to
be more conservative and it also no longer supports negative durations.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1040-duration-reform.md
The inner `duration` module of the `time` module has now been hidden (as
`Duration` is reexported) and the feature name for this type has changed from
`std_misc` to `duration`. All APIs accepting durations have also been audited to
take a more flavorful feature name instead of `std_misc`.
Closes#24874
Also change several error messages to refer to "items" rather than
"methods", since associated items that require resolution during type
checking are not always methods.
There is no subtyping relationship between the types (or their non-freshened
variants), so they can not be merged.
Fixes#22645Fixes#24352Fixes#23825
Should fix#25235 (no test in issue).
Should fix#19976 (test is outdated).
* segfault due to not copying drop flag when coercing
* fat pointer casts
* segfault due to not checking drop flag properly
* debuginfo for DST smart pointers
* unreachable code in drop glue
There is no subtyping relationship between the types (or their non-freshened
variants), so they can not be merged.
Fixes#22645Fixes#24352Fixes#23825
Should fix#25235 (no test in issue).
Should fix#19976 (test is outdated).
core::slice was originally written to tolerate overflow (notably, with
slices of zero-sized elements), but it was never updated to use wrapping
arithmetic when overflow traps were added.
Also correctly handle the case of calling .nth() on an Iter with a
zero-sized element type. The iterator was assuming that the pointer
value of the returned reference was meaningful, but that's not true for
zero-sized elements.
Fixes#25016.
