Rollup of 12 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#136801 (Implement `Random` for tuple)
- rust-lang/rust#141867 (Describe Future invariants more precisely)
- rust-lang/rust#142760 (docs(fs): Touch up grammar on lock api)
- rust-lang/rust#143181 (Improve testing and error messages for malformed attributes)
- rust-lang/rust#143210 (`tests/ui`: A New Order [19/N] )
- rust-lang/rust#143212 (`tests/ui`: A New Order [20/N])
- rust-lang/rust#143230 ([COMPILETEST-UNTANGLE 2/N] Make some compiletest errors/warnings/help more visually obvious)
- rust-lang/rust#143240 (Port `#[rustc_object_lifetime_default]` to the new attribute parsing …)
- rust-lang/rust#143255 (Do not enable LLD by default in the dist profile)
- rust-lang/rust#143262 (mir: Mark `Statement` and `BasicBlockData` as `#[non_exhaustive]`)
- rust-lang/rust#143269 (bootstrap: make comment more clear)
- rust-lang/rust#143279 (Remove `ItemKind::descr` method)
Failed merges:
- rust-lang/rust#143237 (Port `#[no_implicit_prelude]` to the new attribute parsing infrastructure)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
`tests/ui`: A New Order [20/N]
> [!NOTE]
>
> Intermediate commits are intended to help review, but will be squashed prior to merge.
Some `tests/ui/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/`. Part of rust-lang/rust#133895.
r? `@tgross35`
Start moving wf checking away from HIR
I'm trying to only access the HIR in the error path. My hope is that once we move significant portions of wfcheck off HIR that incremental will be able to cache wfcheck queries significantly better.
I think I am reaching a blocker because we normally need to provide good spans to `ObligationCause`, so that the trait solver can report good errors. In some cases I have been able to use bad spans and improve them depending on the `ObligationCauseCode` (by loading HIR in the case where we actually want to error). To scale that further we'll likely need to remove spans from the `ObligationCause` entirely (leaving it to some variants of `ObligationCauseCode` to have a span when they can't recompute the information later). Unsure this is the right approach, but we've already been using it. I will create an MCP about it, but that should not affect this PR, which is fairly limited in where it does those kind of tricks.
Especially b862d8828e is interesting here, because I think it improves spans in all cases
const checks for lifetime-extended temporaries: avoid 'top-level scope' terminology
This error recently got changed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140942 to use the terminology of "top-level scope", but after further discussion in https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1865 it seems the reference will not be using that terminology after all. So let's also remove it from the compiler again, and let's focus on what actually happens with these temporaries: their lifetime is extended until the end of the program.
r? ``@oli-obk`` ``@traviscross``
Normalize before computing ConstArgHasType goal in new solver
This is a fix for rust-lang/rust#139905. See the description I left in the test.
I chose to fix this by normalizing the type before matching on its `.kind()` in `compute_const_arg_has_type_goal` (since it feels somewhat consistent with how we normalize types before assembling their candidates, for example); however, there are several other solutions that come to mind for fixing this ICE:
1. (this solution)
2. Giving `ConstKind::Error` a proper type, like `ConstKind::Value`, so that consts don't go from failing to passing `ConstArgHasType` goals after normalization (i.e. `UNEVALUATED` would normalize into a `ConstKind::Error(_, bool)` type rather than losing its type altogether).
3. Just suppressing the errors and accepting the fact that goals can go from fail->pass after normalization.
Thoughts? Happy to discuss this fix further.
r? `@BoxyUwU`
New const traits syntax
This PR only affects the AST and doesn't actually change anything semantically.
All occurrences of `~const` outside of libcore have been replaced by `[const]`. Within libcore we have to wait for rustfmt to be bumped in the bootstrap compiler. This will happen "automatically" (when rustfmt is run) during the bootstrap bump, as rustfmt converts `~const` into `[const]`. After this we can remove the `~const` support from the parser
Caveat discovered during impl: there is no legacy bare trait object recovery for `[const] Trait` as that snippet in type position goes down the slice /array parsing code and will error
r? ``@fee1-dead``
cc ``@nikomatsakis`` ``@traviscross`` ``@compiler-errors``
This message is no longer generated.
This is probably a good thing. The relevant span is entirely in user
code, and "format_args_nl" is an implementation detail with a name that
isn't even public.
These tests necessarily need to change now that `?Sized` is not
sufficient to accept extern types and `PointeeSized` is now necessary. In
addition, the `size_of_val`/`align_of_val` test can now be changed to
expect an error.
Temporary lifetime extension through tuple struct and tuple variant constructors
This makes temporary lifetime extension work for tuple struct and tuple variant constructors, such as `Some()`.
Before:
```rust
let a = &temp(); // Extended
let a = Some(&temp()); // Not extended :(
let a = Some { 0: &temp() }; // Extended
```
After:
```rust
let a = &temp(); // Extended
let a = Some(&temp()); // Extended
let a = Some { 0: &temp() }; // Extended
```
So, with this change, this works:
```rust
let a = Some(&String::from("hello")); // New: String lifetime now extended!
println!("{a:?}");
```
Until now, we did not extend through tuple struct/variant constructors (like `Some`), because they are function calls syntactically, and we do not want to extend the String lifetime in:
```rust
let a = some_function(&String::from("hello")); // String not extended!
```
However, it turns out to be very easy to distinguish between regular functions and constructors at the point where we do lifetime extension.
In practice, constructors nearly always use UpperCamelCase while regular functions use lower_snake_case, so it should still be easy to for a human programmer at the call site to see whether something qualifies for lifetime extension or not.
This needs a lang fcp.
---
More examples of what will work after this change:
```rust
let x = Person {
name: "Ferris",
job: Some(&Job { // `Job` now extended!
title: "Chief Rustacean",
organisation: "Acme Ltd.",
}),
};
dbg!(x);
```
```rust
let file = if use_stdout {
None
} else {
Some(&File::create("asdf")?) // `File` now extended!
};
set_logger(file);
```
```rust
use std::path::Component;
let c = Component::Normal(&OsString::from(format!("test-{num}"))); // OsString now extended!
assert_eq!(path.components.first().unwrap(), c);
```
refactor `AttributeGate` and `rustc_attr!` to emit notes during feature checking
First commit changes the following:
- `AttributeGate ` from an enum with (four) tuple fields to (five) named fields
- adds a `notes` fields that is emitted as notes in the `PostExpansionVisitor` pass
- removes the `this compiler was built on YYYY-MM-DD; consider upgrading it if it is out of date` note if the feature gate is `rustc_attrs`.
- various phrasing changes and touchups
- and finally, the reason why I went down this path to begin with: tell people they can use the diagnostic namespace when they hit the rustc_on_unimplemented feature gate 🙈
Second commit removes unused machinery for deprecated attributes
const-eval error: always say in which item the error occurred
I don't see why "is this generic" should make a difference. It may be reasonable to key this on whether the error occurs in a `const fn` that was invoked by a const (making it non-obvious which constant it is) vs inside the body of the const.
r? `@oli-obk`
Make obligation cause code suggestions verbose
```
error[E0277]: `()` is not a future
--> $DIR/unnecessary-await.rs:28:10
|
LL | e!().await;
| ^^^^^ `()` is not a future
|
= help: the trait `Future` is not implemented for `()`
= note: () must be a future or must implement `IntoFuture` to be awaited
= note: required for `()` to implement `IntoFuture`
help: remove the `.await`
|
LL - e!().await;
LL + e!();
|
```
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `String: Copy` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/const-fn-in-vec.rs:1:47
|
LL | static _MAYBE_STRINGS: [Option<String>; 5] = [None; 5];
| ^^^^ the trait `Copy` is not implemented for `String`
|
= note: required for `Option<String>` to implement `Copy`
= note: the `Copy` trait is required because this value will be copied for each element of the array
help: create an inline `const` block
|
LL | static _MAYBE_STRINGS: [Option<String>; 5] = [const { None }; 5];
| +++++++ +
```
Part of rust-lang/rust#141973
```
error[E0277]: `()` is not a future
--> $DIR/unnecessary-await.rs:28:10
|
LL | e!().await;
| ^^^^^ `()` is not a future
|
= help: the trait `Future` is not implemented for `()`
= note: () must be a future or must implement `IntoFuture` to be awaited
= note: required for `()` to implement `IntoFuture`
help: remove the `.await`
|
LL - e!().await;
LL + e!();
|
```
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `String: Copy` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/const-fn-in-vec.rs:1:47
|
LL | static _MAYBE_STRINGS: [Option<String>; 5] = [None; 5];
| ^^^^ the trait `Copy` is not implemented for `String`
|
= note: required for `Option<String>` to implement `Copy`
= note: the `Copy` trait is required because this value will be copied for each element of the array
help: create an inline `const` block
|
LL | static _MAYBE_STRINGS: [Option<String>; 5] = [const { None }; 5];
| +++++++ +
```
Make two transmute-related MIR lints into HIR lint
Make `PTR_TO_INTEGER_TRANSMUTE_IN_CONSTS` (rust-lang/rust#130540) and `UNNECESSARY_TRANSMUTES` (rust-lang/rust#136083) into "normal" HIR-based lints.
Funny enough this came up in the review of the latter (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136083#issuecomment-2614301413), but I guess it just was overlooked.
But anywyas, there's no reason for these to be MIR lints; in fact, it makes the suggestions for them a bit more complicated than necessary.
Note that there's probably a few more simplifications and improvements to be done here. Follow-ups can be done in a separate PR, especially if they're about the messaging and suggestions themselves, which I didn't write.
Add some track_caller info to precondition panics
Currently, when you encounter a precondition check, you'll always get the caller location of the implementation of the precondition checks. But with this PR, you'll be told the location of the invalid call. Which is useful.
I thought of this while looking at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129642#issuecomment-2311703898.
The changes to `tests/ui/const*` happen because the const-eval interpreter skips `#[track_caller]` frames in its backtraces.
The perf implications of this are:
* Increased debug binary sizes. The caller_location implementation requires that the additional data we want to display here be stored in const allocations, which are deduplicated but not across crates. There is no impact on optimized build sizes. The panic path and the caller location data get optimized out.
* The compile time hit to opt-incr-patched bitmaps happens because the patch changes the line number of some function calls with precondition checks, causing us to go from 0 dirty CGUs to 1 dirty CGU.
* The other compile time hits are marginal but real, and due to doing a handful of new queries. Adding more useful data isn't completely free.
