Step stage0 to bootstrap from 1.42
This also includes a commit which fixes the rustfmt downloading logic to redownload when the rustfmt channel changes, and bumps rustfmt to a more recent version.
Shrink `Nonterminal`
These commits shrink `Nonterminal` from 240 bytes to 40 bytes. When building `serde_derive` they reduce the number of `memcpy` calls from 9.6M to 7.4M, and it's a tiny win on a few other benchmarks.
r? @petrochenkov
This commit reduces the size of `Nonterminal` from a whopping 240 bytes
to 72 bytes (on x86-64), which gets it below the `memcpy` threshold.
It also removes some impedance mismatches with `Annotatable`, which
already uses `P` for these variants.
```
error[E0412]: cannot find type `T` in this scope
--> file.rs:3:12
|
3 | impl Trait<T> for Struct {}
| - ^ not found in this scope
| |
| help: you might be missing a type parameter: `<T>`
```
Fix#64298.
Implement `?const` opt-out for trait bounds
For now, such bounds are treated exactly the same as unprefixed ones in all contexts. [RFC 2632](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2632) does not specify whether such bounds are forbidden outside of `const` contexts, so they are allowed at the moment.
Prior to this PR, the constness of a trait bound/impl was stored in `TraitRef`. Now, the constness of an `impl` is stored in `ast::ItemKind::Impl` and the constness of a bound in `ast::TraitBoundModifer`. Additionally, constness of trait bounds is now stored in an additional field of `ty::Predicate::Trait`, and the combination of the constness of the item along with any `TraitBoundModifier` determines the constness of the bound in accordance with the RFC. Encoding the constness of impls at the `ty` level is left for a later PR.
After a discussion in \#wg-grammar on Discord, it was decided that the grammar should not encode the mutual exclusivity of trait bound modifiers. The grammar for trait bound modifiers remains `[?const] [?]`. To encode this, I add a dummy variant to `ast::TraitBoundModifier` that is used when the syntax `?const ?` appears. This variant causes an error in AST validation and disappears during HIR lowering.
cc #67794
r? @oli-obk
Remove `rustc_error_codes` deps except in `rustc_driver`
Remove dependencies on `rustc_error_codes` in all crates except for `rustc_driver`.
This has some benefits:
1. Adding a new error code when hacking on the compiler only requires rebuilding at most `rustc_error_codes`, `rustc_driver`, and the reflexive & transitive closure of the crate where the new error code is being added and its reverse dependencies. This improves time-to-UI-tests (TTUT).
2. Adding an error description to an error code only requires rebuilding `rustc_error_codes` and `rustc_driver`. This should substantially improve TTUT.
r? @petrochenkov
cc @rust-lang/wg-diagnostics
Don't require `allow_internal_unstable` unless `staged_api` is enabled.
#63770 changed `qualify_min_const_fn` to require `allow_internal_unstable` for *all* crates that used an unstable feature, regardless of whether `staged_api` was enabled or the `fn` that used that feature was stably const. In practice, this meant that every crate in the ecosystem that wanted to use nightly features added `#![feature(const_fn)]`, which skips `qualify_min_const_fn` entirely.
After this PR, crates that do not have `#![feature(staged_api)]` will only need to enable the feature they are interested in. For example, `#![feature(const_if_match)]` will be enough to enable `if` and `match` in constants. Crates with `staged_api` (e.g., `libstd`) require `#[allow_internal_unstable]` to be added to a function if it uses nightly features unless that function is also marked `#[rustc_const_unstable]`. This prevents proliferation of `#[allow_internal_unstable]` into functions that are not callable in a `const` context on stable.
r? @oli-obk (author of #63770)
cc @Centril
This flag opts out of the min-const-fn checks entirely, which is usually
not what we want. The few cases where the flag is still necessary have
been annotated.
This is used for both the `?const` syntax in bounds as well as the `impl
const Trait` syntax. I also considered handling these separately by
adding a variant of `TraitBoundModifier` and a field to
`ItemKind::Impl`, but this approach was less intrusive.
