Make non-power-of-two alignments a validity error in `Layout`
Inspired by the zulip conversation about how `Layout` should better enforce `size <= isize::MAX as usize`, this uses an N-variant enum on N-bit platforms to require at the validity level that the existing invariant of "must be a power of two" is upheld.
This was MIRI can catch it, and means there's a more-specific type for `Layout` to store than just `NonZeroUsize`.
It's left as `pub(crate)` here; a future PR could consider giving it a tracking issue for non-internal usage.
Inspired by the zulip conversation about how `Layout` should better enforce `size < isize::MAX as usize`, this uses an N-variant enum on N-bit platforms to require at the validity level that the existing invariant of "must be a power of two" is upheld.
This was MIRI can catch it, and means there's a more-specific type for `Layout` to store than just `NonZeroUsize`.
Let CTFE to handle partially uninitialized unions without marking the entire value as uninitialized.
follow up to #94411
To fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/69488 and by extension fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/94371, we should stop treating types like `MaybeUninit<usize>` as something that the `Scalar` type in the interpreter engine can represent. So we add a new field to `abi::Primitive` that records whether the primitive is nested in a union
cc `@RalfJung`
r? `@ghost`
When encountering an unsatisfied trait bound, if there are no other
suggestions, mention all the types that *do* implement that trait:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `f32: Foo` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/impl_wf.rs:22:6
|
LL | impl Baz<f32> for f32 { }
| ^^^^^^^^ the trait `Foo` is not implemented for `f32`
|
= help: the following other types implement trait `Foo`:
Option<T>
i32
str
note: required by a bound in `Baz`
--> $DIR/impl_wf.rs:18:31
|
LL | trait Baz<U: ?Sized> where U: Foo { }
| ^^^ required by this bound in `Baz`
```
Mention implementers of traits in `ImplObligation`s.
Do not mention other `impl`s for closures, ranges and `?`.
Handle rustc_const_stable attribute in library feature collector
The library feature collector in [compiler/rustc_passes/src/lib_features.rs](551b4fa395/compiler/rustc_passes/src/lib_features.rs) has only been looking at `#[stable(…)]`, `#[unstable(…)]`, and `#[rustc_const_unstable(…)]` attributes, while ignoring `#[rustc_const_stable(…)]`. The consequences of this were:
- When any const feature got stabilized (changing one or more `rustc_const_unstable` to `rustc_const_stable`), users who had previously enabled that unstable feature using `#![feature(…)]` would get told "unknown feature", rather than rustc's nicer "the feature … has been stable since … and no longer requires an attribute to enable".
This can be seen in the way that https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93957#issuecomment-1079794660 failed after rebase:
```console
error[E0635]: unknown feature `const_ptr_offset`
--> $DIR/offset_from_ub.rs:1:35
|
LL | #![feature(const_ptr_offset_from, const_ptr_offset)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
- We weren't enforcing that a particular feature is either stable everywhere or unstable everywhere, and that a feature that has been stabilized has the same stabilization version everywhere, both of which we enforce for the other stability attributes.
This PR updates the library feature collector to handle `rustc_const_stable`, and fixes places in the standard library and test suite where `rustc_const_stable` was being used in a way that does not meet the rules for a stability attribute.
Separate const prop lints from optimizations
r? `@oli-obk`
Separates lints and optimizations during const prop by moving the lints into their own file and checking them during post borrowck cleanup.
Thanks to `@oli-obk` for mentoring me.
interpret/memory: simplify check_and_deref_ptr
*Finally* I saw a way to make this code simpler. The odd preprocessing in `let ptr_or_addr =` has bothered me since forever, but it actually became unnecessary in the last provenance refactoring. :)
This also leads to slightly more explicit error messages as a nice side-effect. 🎉
r? `@oli-obk`
Rename `~const Drop` to `~const Destruct`
r? `@oli-obk`
Completely switching to `~const Destructible` would be rather complicated, so it seems best to add it for now and wait for it to be backported to beta in the next release.
The rationale is to prevent complications such as #92149 and #94803 by introducing an entirely new trait. And `~const Destructible` reads a bit better than `~const Drop`. Name Bikesheddable.
CTFE/Miri: detect out-of-bounds pointers in offset_from
Also I became uneasy with aggressively doing `try_to_int` here -- this will always succeed on Miri, leading to the wrong codepath being taken. We should rather try to convert them both to pointers, and use the integer path as a fallback, so that's what I implemented now.
Hiding whitespaces helps with the diff.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/1950
r? ``@oli-obk``
Treat constant values as mir::ConstantKind::Val
Another step that is necessary for the introduction of Valtrees: we don't want to treat `ty::Const` instances of kind `ty::ConstKind::Value` as `mir::ConstantKind::Ty` anymore.
r? `@oli-obk`
Use impl substs in `#[rustc_on_unimplemented]`
We were using the trait-ref substs instead of impl substs in `rustc_on_unimplemented`, even when computing the `rustc_on_unimplemented` attached to an impl block. Let's not do that.
This PR also untangles impl and trait def-ids in the logic in `on_unimplemented` a bit.
Fixes#94675
