resolve: Turn the binding from `#[macro_export]` into a proper `Import`
Continuation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91795.
```rust
#[macro_export]
macro_rules! m { /*...*/ }
```
is desugared to something like
```rust
macro_rules! m { /*...*/ } // Non-modularized macro_rules item
pub use m; // It's modularized reexport
```
This PR adjusts the internal representation to better match this model.
Fix E0433 No Typo Suggestions
Fixes#48676Fixes#87791Fixes#96625Fixes#95462Fixes#101637
Follows up PR #72923
Several open issues refer to the problem that E0433 does not suggest typos like other errors normally do. This fix augments the implementation of PR #72923.
**Background**
When the path of a function call, e.g. `Struct::foo()`, involves names that cannot be resolved, there are two errors that could be emitted by the compiler:
- If `Struct` is not found, it is ``E0433: failed to resolve: use of undeclared type `Struct` ``.
- If `foo` is not found in `Struct`, it is ``E0599: no function or associated item named `foo` found for struct `Struct` in the current scope``
When a name is used as a type, `e.g. fn foo() -> Struct`, and the name cannot be resolved, it is ``E0412: cannot find type `Struct` in this scope``.
Before #72923, `E0433` does not implement any suggestions, and the PR introduces suggestions for missing `use`s. When a resolution error occurs in the path of a function call, it tries to smart resolve just the type part of the path, e.g. `module::Struct` of a call to `module::Struct::foo()`. However, along with the suggestions, the smart-resolve function will report `E0412` since it only knows that it is a type that we cannot resolve instead of being a part of the path. So, the original implementation swap out `E0412` errors returned by the smart-resolve function with the real `E0433` error, but keeps the "missing `use`" suggestions to be reported to the programmer.
**Issue**
The current implementation only reports if there are "missing `use`" suggestions returned by the smart-resolve function; otherwise, it would fall back the normal reporting, which does not emit suggestions. But the smart-resolve function could also produce typo suggestions, which are omitted currently.
Also, it seems like that not all info has been swapped out when there are missing suggestions. The error message underlining the name in the snippet still says ``not found in this scope``, which is a `E0412` messages, if there are `use` suggestions, but says the normal `use of undeclared type` otherwise.
**Fixes**
This fix swaps out all fields in `Diagnostic` returned by the smart-resolve function except for `suggestions` with the current error, and merges the `suggestions` of the returned error and that of the current error together. If there are `use` suggestions, the error is saved to `use_injection` to be reported at the end; otherwise, the error is emitted immediately as `Resolver::report_error` does.
Some tests are updated to use the correct underlining error messages, and one additional test for typo suggestion is added to the test suite.
r? rust-lang/diagnostics
Rewrite implementation of `#[alloc_error_handler]`
The new implementation doesn't use weak lang items and instead changes `#[alloc_error_handler]` to an attribute macro just like `#[global_allocator]`.
The attribute will generate the `__rg_oom` function which is called by the compiler-generated `__rust_alloc_error_handler`. If no `__rg_oom` function is defined in any crate then the compiler shim will call `__rdl_oom` in the alloc crate which will simply panic.
This also fixes link errors with `-C link-dead-code` with `default_alloc_error_handler`: `__rg_oom` was previously defined in the alloc crate and would attempt to reference the `oom` lang item, even if it didn't exist. This worked as long as `__rg_oom` was excluded from linking since it was not called.
This is a prerequisite for the stabilization of `default_alloc_error_handler` (#102318).
Enable RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP for a few steps
This forward-ports this commit so we don't need to keep applying it when branching beta (as done in 1.64, 1.65, and 1.66 beta bumps).
Remove generation of tuple struct fields in the search index
This comes from [this discussion](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103710) as they're not very useful.
r? `@notriddle`
Reduce span of let else irrefutable_let_patterns warning
Huge spans aren't good for IDE users as they underline constructs that are possibly multiline.
Similar PR to #90761 which did the same for the `unused_macros` lint.
Update note about unstable split-debuginfo flag.
split-debuginfo was effectively stabilized in #98051. The note about it requiring `-Z unstable-options` is no longer accurate.
The rules for when it is gated and when it is supported are somewhat complex. I considered removing the note entirely, or making it more generic, but opted to instead try to summarize the current state.
Include both benchmarks and tests in the numbers given to `TeFiltered{,Out}`
Fixes#103794
`#[bench]` is broken on nightly without this, sadly. It apparently has no test coverage. In addition to manually testing, I've added a run-make smokecheck for this (which would have caught the issue), but it would be nice to have a better way to test, err, libtest. For now we should get this in ASAP IMO
The new implementation doesn't use weak lang items and instead changes
`#[alloc_error_handler]` to an attribute macro just like
`#[global_allocator]`.
The attribute will generate the `__rg_oom` function which is called by
the compiler-generated `__rust_alloc_error_handler`. If no `__rg_oom`
function is defined in any crate then the compiler shim will call
`__rdl_oom` in the alloc crate which will simply panic.
This also fixes link errors with `-C link-dead-code` with
`default_alloc_error_handler`: `__rg_oom` was previously defined in the
alloc crate and would attempt to reference the `oom` lang item, even if
it didn't exist. This worked as long as `__rg_oom` was excluded from
linking since it was not called.
This is a prerequisite for the stabilization of
`default_alloc_error_handler` (#102318).
Before this PR, the compiler would emit the debuginfo name `slice$<T>`
for all kinds of slices, regardless of whether they are behind a
reference or not and regardless of the kind of reference. As a
consequence, the types `Foo<&[T]>`, `Foo<[T]>`, and `Foo<&mut [T]>`
would end up with the same type name `Foo<slice$<T> >` in debuginfo,
making it impossible to disambiguate between them by name. Similarly,
`&str` would get the name `str` in debuginfo, so the debuginfo name for
`Foo<str>` and `Foo<&str>` would be the same. In contrast,
`*const [bool]` and `*mut [bool]` would be `ptr_const$<slice$<bool> >`
and `ptr_mut$<slice$<bool> >`, i.e. the encoding does not lose
information about the type.
This PR removes all special handling for slices and `str`. The types
`&[bool]`, `&mut [bool]`, and `&str` thus get the names
`ref$<slice2$<bool> >`, `ref_mut$<slice2$<bool> >`, and
`ref$<str$>` respectively -- as one would expect.
