Improve `select_nth_unstable` documentation clarity
* Instead uses `before` and `after` variable names in the example
where `greater` and `lesser` are flipped.
* Uses `<=` and `>=` instead of "less than or equal to" and "greater
than or equal to" to make the docs more concise.
* General attempt to remove unnecessary words and be more precise. For
example it seems slightly wrong to say "its final sorted position",
since this implies there is only one sorted position for this element.
[cfg_match] Adjust syntax
A year has passed since the creation of #115585 and the feature, as expected, is not moving forward. Let's change that.
This PR proposes changing the arm's syntax from `cfg(SOME_CONDITION) => { ... }` to `SOME_CODITION => {}`.
```rust
match_cfg! {
unix => {
fn foo() { /* unix specific functionality */ }
}
target_pointer_width = "32" => {
fn foo() { /* non-unix, 32-bit functionality */ }
}
_ => {
fn foo() { /* fallback implementation */ }
}
}
```
Why? Because after several manual migrations in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116342 it became clear, at least for me, that `cfg` prefixes are unnecessary, verbose and redundant.
Again, everything is just a proposal to move things forward. If the shown syntax isn't ideal, feel free to close this PR or suggest other alternatives.
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #135497 (fix typo in typenames of pin documentation)
- #135522 (add incremental test for issue 135514)
- #135523 (const traits: remove some known-bug that do not seem to make sense)
- #135535 (Add GUI test for #135499)
- #135541 (Methods of const traits are const)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
fix typo in typenames of pin documentation
I noticed this whilst reading the documentation for pin.
Basically there was just one to many closing angle brackets on the type parameters in the documentation where instead of being `Pin<&mut T>` it was `Pin<&mut T>>`
deprecate `std::intrinsics::transmute` etc, use `std::mem::*` instead
The `rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules` attribute lets users call `std::mem::transmute` as `std::intrinsics::transmute`. The former is a reexport of the latter, and for a long time we didn't properly check stability for reexports, so making this a hard error now would be a breaking change for little gain. But at the same time, `std::intrinsics::transmute` is not the intended path for this function, so I think it is a good idea to show a deprecation warning when that path is used. This PR implements that, for all the functions in `std::intrinsics` that carry the attribute.
I assume this will need ``@rust-lang/libs-api`` FCP.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #132397 (Make missing_abi lint warn-by-default.)
- #133807 (ci: Enable opt-dist for dist-aarch64-linux builds)
- #134143 (Convert `struct FromBytesWithNulError` into enum)
- #134338 (Use a C-safe return type for `__rust_[ui]128_*` overflowing intrinsics)
- #134678 (Update `ReadDir::next` in `std::sys::pal::unix::fs` to use `&raw const (*p).field` instead of `p.byte_offset().cast()`)
- #135424 (Detect unstable lint docs that dont enable their feature)
- #135520 (Make sure we actually use the right trivial lifetime substs when eagerly monomorphizing drop for ADTs)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Convert `struct FromBytesWithNulError` into enum
This PR renames the former `kind` enum from `FromBytesWithNulErrorKind` to `FromBytesWithNulError`, and removes the original struct.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/493
## Possible Changes - TBD
* [x] should the new `enum FromBytesWithNulError` derive `Copy`?
* [ ] should there be any new/changed attributes?
* [x] add some more tests
## Problem
One of `CStr` constructors, `CStr::from_bytes_with_nul(bytes: &[u8])` handles 3 cases:
1. `bytes` has one NULL as the last value - creates CStr
2. `bytes` has no NULL - error
3. `bytes` has a NULL in some other position - error
The 3rd case is error that may require lossy conversion, but the 2nd case can easily be handled by the user code. Unfortunately, this function returns an opaque `FromBytesWithNulError` error in both 2nd and 3rd case, so the user cannot detect just the 2nd case - having to re-implement the entire function and bring in the `memchr` dependency.
## Motivating examples or use cases
In [this code](f86d7a8768/varnish-sys/src/vcl/ws.rs (L158)), my FFI code needs to copy user's `&[u8]` into a C-allocated memory blob in a NUL-terminated `CStr` format. My code must first validate if `&[u8]` has a trailing NUL (case 1), no NUL (adds one on the fly - case 2), or NUL in the middle (3rd case - error). I had to re-implement `from_bytes_with_nul` and add `memchr`dependency just to handle the 2nd case.
r? `@Amanieu`
Add #[inline] to copy_from_slice
I'm doing cooked things to CGU partitioning for compiler-builtins (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/135395) and this was the lone symbol in my compiler-builtins rlib that wasn't an intrinsic. Adding `#[inline]` makes it go away.
Perf report indicates a marginal but chaotic effect on compile time, marginal improvement in codegen. As expected.
update and clarify StructuralPartialEq docs
This apparently hasn't been updated when we finalized the current const pattern matching behavior.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/92454 by providing rationale and context in the docs linked from that error message.
One of `CStr` constructors, `CStr::from_bytes_with_nul(bytes: &[u8])` handles 3 cases:
1. `bytes` has one NULL as the last value - creates CStr
2. `bytes` has no NULL - error
3. `bytes` has a NULL in some other position - error
The 3rd case is error that may require lossy conversion, but the 2nd case can easily be handled by the user code. Unfortunately, this function returns an opaque `FromBytesWithNulError` error in both 2nd and 3rd case, so the user cannot detect just the 2nd case - having to re-implement the entire function and bring in the `memchr` dependency.
In [this code](f86d7a8768/varnish-sys/src/vcl/ws.rs (L158)), my FFI code needs to copy user's `&[u8]` into a C-allocated memory blob in a NUL-terminated `CStr` format. My code must first validate if `&[u8]` has a trailing NUL (case 1), no NUL (adds one on the fly - case 2), or NUL in the middle (3rd case - error). I had to re-implement `from_bytes_with_nul` and add `memchr`dependency just to handle the 2nd case.
This PR renames the former `kind` enum from `FromBytesWithNulErrorKind` to `FromBytesWithNulError`, and removes the original struct.
Use `NonNull::without_provenance` within the standard library
This API removes the need for several `unsafe` blocks, and leads to clearer code. It uses feature `nonnull_provenance` (#135243).
Close#135343
Update a bunch of library types for MCP807
This greatly reduces the number of places that actually use the `rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_*` attributes down to just 3:
```
library/core\src\ptr\non_null.rs
68:#[rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_start(1)]
library/core\src\num\niche_types.rs
19: #[rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_start($low)]
20: #[rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_end($high)]
```
Everything else -- PAL Nanoseconds, alloc's `Cap`, niched FDs, etc -- all just wrap those `niche_types` types.
r? ghost
This greatly reduces the number of places that actually use the `rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_*` attributes down to just 3:
```
library/core\src\ptr\non_null.rs
68:#[rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_start(1)]
library/core\src\num\niche_types.rs
19: #[rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_start($low)]
20: #[rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_end($high)]
```
Everything else -- PAL Nanoseconds, alloc's `Cap`, niched FDs, etc -- all just wrap those `niche_types` types.
Fix `ptr::from_ref` documentation example comment
The comment says that the expression involves no function call, but that was only true for the example above, the example here _does_ contain a function call.
``@rustbot`` label A-docs
Improve prose around `as_slice` example of IterMut
I've removed the cryptic message about not being able to call `&mut self` methods while retaining a shared borrow of the iterator, such as `as_slice` produces. This is just normal borrowing rules and does not seem especially relevant here. I can whip up a replacement if someone thinks it has value.
[generic_assert] Constify methods used by the formatting system
cc #44838
Starts the "constification" of all the elements required to allow the execution of the formatting system in constant environments.
```rust
const _: () = { panic!("{:?}", 1i32); };
```
Further stuff is blocked by #133999.
