rustc: Stabilize options for pipelined compilation
This commit stabilizes options in the compiler necessary for Cargo to
enable "pipelined compilation" by default. The concept of pipelined
compilation, how it's implemented, and what it means for rustc are
documented in #60988. This PR is coupled with a PR against Cargo
(rust-lang/cargo#7143) which updates Cargo's support for pipelined
compliation to rustc, and also enables support by default in Cargo.
(note that the Cargo PR cannot land until this one against rustc lands).
The technical changes performed here were to stabilize the functionality
proposed in #60419 and #60987, the underlying pieces to enable pipelined
compilation support in Cargo. The issues have had some discussion during
stabilization, but the newly stabilized surface area here is:
* A new `--json` flag was added to the compiler.
* The `--json` flag can be passed multiple times.
* The value of the `--json` flag is a comma-separated list of
directives.
* The `--json` flag cannot be combined with `--color`
* The `--json` flag must be combined with `--error-format=json`
* The acceptable list of directives to `--json` are:
* `diagnostic-short` - the `rendered` field of diagnostics will have a
"short" rendering matching `--error-format=short`
* `diagnostic-rendered-ansi` - the `rendered` field of diagnostics
will be colorized with ansi color codes embedded in the string field
* `artifacts` - JSON blobs will be emitted for artifacts being emitted
by the compiler
The unstable `-Z emit-artifact-notifications` and `--json-rendered`
flags have also been removed during this commit as well.
Closes#60419Closes#60987Closes#60988
This commit stabilizes options in the compiler necessary for Cargo to
enable "pipelined compilation" by default. The concept of pipelined
compilation, how it's implemented, and what it means for rustc are
documented in #60988. This PR is coupled with a PR against Cargo
(rust-lang/cargo#7143) which updates Cargo's support for pipelined
compliation to rustc, and also enables support by default in Cargo.
(note that the Cargo PR cannot land until this one against rustc lands).
The technical changes performed here were to stabilize the functionality
proposed in #60419 and #60987, the underlying pieces to enable pipelined
compilation support in Cargo. The issues have had some discussion during
stabilization, but the newly stabilized surface area here is:
* A new `--json` flag was added to the compiler.
* The `--json` flag can be passed multiple times.
* The value of the `--json` flag is a comma-separated list of
directives.
* The `--json` flag cannot be combined with `--color`
* The `--json` flag must be combined with `--error-format=json`
* The acceptable list of directives to `--json` are:
* `diagnostic-short` - the `rendered` field of diagnostics will have a
"short" rendering matching `--error-format=short`
* `diagnostic-rendered-ansi` - the `rendered` field of diagnostics
will be colorized with ansi color codes embedded in the string field
* `artifacts` - JSON blobs will be emitted for artifacts being emitted
by the compiler
The unstable `-Z emit-artifact-notifications` and `--json-rendered`
flags have also been removed during this commit as well.
Closes#60419Closes#60987Closes#60988
We have to deal with dummy spans anyway
Remove def-site span from expander interfaces.
It's not used by the expansion infra, only by specific expanders, which can keep it themselves if they want it.
Now that procedural macros no longer link transitively to libsyntax,
this shouldn't be needed any more! This commit is an experiment in
removing all dynamic libraries from rustc except for librustc_driver
itself. Let's see how far we can get with that!
Remove support for 1-token lookahead from the lexer
`StringReader` maintained `peek_token` and `peek_span_src_raw` for look ahead.
`peek_token` was used only by rustdoc syntax coloring. After moving peeking logic into highlighter, I was able to remove `peek_token` from the lexer. I tried to use `iter::Peekable`, but that wasn't as pretty as I hoped, due to buffered fatal errors. So I went with hand-rolled peeking.
After that I've noticed that the only peeking behavior left was for raw tokens to test tt jointness. I've rewritten it in terms of trivia tokens, and not just spans.
After that it became possible to simplify the awkward constructor of the lexer, which could return `Err` if the first peeked token contained error.
The (almost) culmination of HirIdification
It's finally over.
This PR removes old `FIXME`s and renames some functions so that the `HirId` variant has the shorter name.
All that remains (and rightfully so) is stuff in `resolve`, `save_analysis` and (as far as I can tell) in a few places where we can't replace `NodeId` with `HirId`.
Implement another internal lints
cc #49509
This adds ~~two~~ one internal lint~~s~~:
1. LINT_PASS_IMPL_WITHOUT_MACRO: Make sure, that the `{declare,impl}_lint_pass` macro is used to implement lint passes. cc #59669
2. ~~USAGE_OF_TYCTXT_AND_SPAN_ARGS: item 2 on the list in #49509~~
~~With 2. I wasn't sure, if this lint should be applied everywhere. That means a careful review of 0955835 would be great. Also 73fb9b4 allows this lint on some functions. Should I also apply this lint there?~~
TODO (not directly relevant for review):
- [ ] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/59316#discussion_r280186517 (not sure yet, if this works or how to query for `rustc_private`, since it's not in [`Features`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/syntax/feature_gate/struct.Features.html) 🤔 cc @eddyb)
- [x] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/61735#discussion_r292389870
- [x] Check explicitly for the `{declare,impl}_lint_pass!` macros
r? @oli-obk
HirIdification: almost there
I'm beginning to run out of stuff to HirIdify 😉.
This time I targeted mainly `hir::map::{find, get_parent_node}`, but a few other bits got changed too.
r? @Zoxc
Fix error counting
Count duplicate errors for `track_errors` and other error counting checks.
Add FIXMEs to make it clear that we should be moving away from this kind of logic.
Closes#61663
Remove `ast::Guard`
With the introduction of `ast::ExprKind::Let` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/60861, the `ast::Guard` structure is now redundant in terms of representing [`if let` guards](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/51114) in AST since it can be represented by `ExprKind::Let` syntactically. Therefore, we remove `ast::Guard` here.
However, we keep `hir::Guard` because the semantic representation is a different matter and this story is more unclear right now (might involve `goto 'arm` in HIR or something...).
r? @petrochenkov
