Use relative visibility when noting sealed trait to reduce false positive
Fixesrust-lang/rust#143392
I used relative visibility instead of just determining if it's public or not.
r? compiler
Split up the `unknown_or_malformed_diagnostic_attributes` lint
This splits up the lint into the following lint group:
- `unknown_diagnostic_attributes` - triggers if the attribute is unknown to the current compiler
- `misplaced_diagnostic_attributes` - triggers if the attribute exists but it is not placed on the item kind it's meant for
- `malformed_diagnostic_attributes` - triggers if the attribute's syntax or options are invalid
- `malformed_diagnostic_format_literals` - triggers if the format string literal is invalid, for example if it has unpaired curly braces or invalid parameters
- this pr doesn't create it, but future lints for things like deprecations can also go here.
This PR does not start emitting lints in places that previously did not.
## Motivation
I want to have finer control over what `unknown_or_malformed_diagnostic_attributes` does
I have a project with fairly low msrv that is/will have a lower msrv than future diagnostic attributes. So lints will be emitted when I or others compile it on a lower msrv.
At this time, there are two options to silence these lints:
- `#[allow(unknown_or_malformed_diagnostic_attributes)]` - this risks diagnostic regressions if I (or others) mess up using the attribute, or if the attribute's syntax ever changes.
- write a build script to detect the compiler version and emit cfgs, and then conditionally enable the attribute:
```rust
#[cfg_attr(rust_version_99, diagnostic::new_attr_in_rust_99(thing = ..))]`
struct Foo;
```
or conditionally `allow` the lint:
```rust
// lib.rs
#![cfg_attr(not(current_rust), allow(unknown_or_malformed_diagnostic_attributes))]
```
I like to avoid using build scripts if I can, so the following works much better for me. That is what this PR will let me do in the future:
```rust
#[allow(unknown_diagnostic_attribute, reason = "attribute came out in rust 1.99 but msrv is 1.70")]
#[diagnostic::new_attr_in_rust_99(thing = ..)]`
struct Foo;
In the suggestion machinery for borrowing expressions and types, always use the available obligation `Span` to find the appropriate `Expr` to perform appropriateness checks no the `ExprKind` instead of on the textual snippet corresponding to the `Span`.
Unify the logic for the case where `&` *and* `&mut` are appropriate with the logic for only one of those cases.
Handle the case when `S::foo()` should have been `<&S>::foo()` (instead of suggesting the prior `&S::foo()`.
More carefully consider span context when suggesting remove `&mut`
Use `find_ancestor_inside` to compute a relative span that is macro-aware, rather than falling back to using BytePos arithmetic which is wrong for `&mut`.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/143523
Do not suggest borrow that is already there in fully-qualified call
When encountering `&str::from("value")` do not suggest `&&str::from("value")`.
Fix#132041.
Fix some comments and related types and locals where it is obvious, e.g.
- bare_fn -> fn_ptr
- LifetimeBinderKind::BareFnType -> LifetimeBinderKind::FnPtrType
Co-authored-by: León Orell Valerian Liehr <me@fmease.dev>
New const traits syntax
This PR only affects the AST and doesn't actually change anything semantically.
All occurrences of `~const` outside of libcore have been replaced by `[const]`. Within libcore we have to wait for rustfmt to be bumped in the bootstrap compiler. This will happen "automatically" (when rustfmt is run) during the bootstrap bump, as rustfmt converts `~const` into `[const]`. After this we can remove the `~const` support from the parser
Caveat discovered during impl: there is no legacy bare trait object recovery for `[const] Trait` as that snippet in type position goes down the slice /array parsing code and will error
r? ``@fee1-dead``
cc ``@nikomatsakis`` ``@traviscross`` ``@compiler-errors``
Add DesugaringKind::FormatLiteral
Implements `DesugaringKind::FormatLiteral` to mark the FormatArgs desugaring of format literals. The main use for this is to stop yapping about about formatting parameters if we're not anywhere near a format literal. The other use case is to fix suggestions such as https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/141350. It might also be useful for new or existing diagnostics that check whether they're in a format-like macro.
cc `@xizheyin` `@fmease`
Merge unboxed trait object error suggestion into regular dyn incompat error
Another hir-walker removed from the well-formed queries. This error was always a duplicate of another, but it was able to provide more information because it could invoke `is_dyn_compatible` without worrying about cycle errors. That's also the reason we can't put the error directly into hir_ty_lowering when lowering a `dyn Trait` within an associated item signature. So instead I packed it into the error handling of wf obligation checking.
Reduce uses of `hir_crate`.
I tried rebasing my old incremental-HIR branch. This is a by-product, which is required if we want to get rid of `hir_crate` entirely.
The second commit is a drive-by cleanup. It can be pulled into its own PR.
r? ````@oli-obk````
When printing impl headers in a diagnostic, the compiler has to account
for `?Sized` implying `MetaSized` and new `MetaSized` and `PointeeSized`
bounds.
Like `Sized` diagnostics, sorting `MetaSized` and `PointeeSized`
diagnostics last prevents earlier more useful diagnostics from being
skipped because there has already been error tainting.
