Add the RLS as a submodule and build a package out of it
r? @brson (and cc @alexcrichton) Please review closely, I am not at all convinced I've done the right things here. I did run `x.py dist` and it makes an rls package which looks right to my eyes, but I haven't tested on non-linux platforms nor am I really sure what it should look like.
This does not attempt to run tests for the RLS yet.
* Use the right version when building combined installer
* Update dependencies of rls as it depends on rustc and plugins
* Fix build-manifest and the versions it uses for the rls
Instead of rendering all of the HTML in rustdoc this relies on
pulldown-cmark's `push_html` to do most of the work. A few iterator
adapters are used to make rustdoc specific modifications to the output.
This also fixes MarkdownHtml and link titles in plain_summary_line.
Add a tidy lint that checks for...
* Unstable Book sections with no corresponding SUMMARY.md links
* unstable features that don't have Unstable Book sections
* Unstable Book sections that don't have corresponding unstable features
rustbuild: Update bootstrap compiler
Now that we've also updated cargo's release process this commit also changes the
download location of Cargo from Cargos archives back to the static.r-l.o
archives. This should ensure that the Cargo download is the exact Cargo paired
with the rustc that we release.
Now that we've also updated cargo's release process this commit also changes the
download location of Cargo from Cargos archives back to the static.r-l.o
archives. This should ensure that the Cargo download is the exact Cargo paired
with the rustc that we release.
It looks like the 6.3.0 MinGW comes with a gdb which has issues (#40184) that an
attempted workaround (#40777) does not actually fix (#40835). The original
motivation for upgradin MinGW was to fix build flakiness (#40546) due to newer
builds not exhibiting the same bug, so let's hope that 6.2.0 isn't too far back
in time and still contains the fix we need.
Closes#40835
Remove internal liblog
This commit deletes the internal liblog in favor of the implementation that
lives on crates.io. Similarly it's also setting a convention for adding crates
to the compiler. The main restriction right now is that we want compiler
implementation details to be unreachable from normal Rust code (e.g. requires a
feature), and by default everything in the sysroot is reachable via `extern
crate`.
The proposal here is to require that crates pulled in have these lines in their
`src/lib.rs`:
#![cfg_attr(rustbuild, feature(staged_api, rustc_private))]
#![cfg_attr(rustbuild, unstable(feature = "rustc_private", issue = "27812"))]
This'll mean that by default they're not using these attributes but when
compiled as part of the compiler they do a few things:
* Mark themselves as entirely unstable via the `staged_api` feature and the
`#![unstable]` attribute.
* Allow usage of other unstable crates via `feature(rustc_private)` which is
required if the crate relies on any other crates to compile (other than std).
In debugging #40546 I was able to reproduce locally finally using
the literal toolchain that the bots were using. I reproduced the error maybe 4
in 10 builds. I also have the 6.3.0 toolchain installed through `pacman` which
has yet to have a failed build.
When attempting to reproduce the bug with the toolchain that this commit
switches to I was unable to reproduce anything after a few builds. I have no
idea what the original problem was, but I'm hoping that it was just some random
bug fixed somewhere along the way.
I don't currently know of a technical reason to stick to the 4.9.2 toolchains we
were previously using. Historcal 5.3.* toolchains would cause llvm to segfault
(maybe a miscompile?) but this seems to have been fixed recently. To me if it
passes CI then I think we're good.
Closes#40546
This commit deletes the internal liblog in favor of the implementation that
lives on crates.io. Similarly it's also setting a convention for adding crates
to the compiler. The main restriction right now is that we want compiler
implementation details to be unreachable from normal Rust code (e.g. requires a
feature), and by default everything in the sysroot is reachable via `extern
crate`.
The proposal here is to require that crates pulled in have these lines in their
`src/lib.rs`:
#![cfg_attr(rustbuild, feature(staged_api, rustc_private))]
#![cfg_attr(rustbuild, unstable(feature = "rustc_private", issue = "27812"))]
This'll mean that by default they're not using these attributes but when
compiled as part of the compiler they do a few things:
* Mark themselves as entirely unstable via the `staged_api` feature and the
`#![unstable]` attribute.
* Allow usage of other unstable crates via `feature(rustc_private)` which is
required if the crate relies on any other crates to compile (other than std).
It is more robust to not fail if any directory in a path was created
concurrently. This change lifts rustc internal `create_dir_racy` that
was created to handle such conditions to be new `create_dir_all`
implementation.
Don't put Cargo into the rustc workspace
This causes problems when first cloning and bootstrapping the repository
unfortunately, so let's ensure that Cargo sticks around in its own workspace.
Because Cargo is a submodule it's not available by default on the inital clone
of the rust-lang/rust repository. Normally it's the responsibility of the
rustbuild to take care of this, but unfortunately to build rustbuild itself we
need to resolve the workspace conflicts.
To deal with this we'll just have to ensure that all submodules are in their own
workspace, which sort of makes sense anyway as updates to dependencies as
bugfixes to Cargo should go to rust-lang/cargo instead of rust-lang/rust. In any
case this commit removes Cargo from the global workspace which should resolve
the issues that we've been seeing.
To actually perform this the `cargo` submodule has been moved to a new `vendor`
directory to ensure it's outside the scope of `src/Cargo.toml` as a workspace.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/40284
Restore creating the channel-rust-$channel-date.txt files
I have **not** run this (because I don't know how to 😇), but it *does* compile.
r? @alexcrichton
This causes problems when first cloning and bootstrapping the repository
unfortunately, so let's ensure that Cargo sticks around in its own workspace.
Because Cargo is a submodule it's not available by default on the inital clone
of the rust-lang/rust repository. Normally it's the responsibility of the
rustbuild to take care of this, but unfortunately to build rustbuild itself we
need to resolve the workspace conflicts.
To deal with this we'll just have to ensure that all submodules are in their own
workspace, which sort of makes sense anyway as updates to dependencies as
bugfixes to Cargo should go to rust-lang/cargo instead of rust-lang/rust. In any
case this commit removes Cargo from the global workspace which should resolve
the issues that we've been seeing.
To actually perform this the `cargo` submodule has been moved to the top
directory to ensure it's outside the scope of `src/Cargo.toml` as a workspace.
This change introduces a Dockerfile and script which builds a complete
Fuchsia toolchain which can be used to build Rust distribution for
Fuchsia. We only support cross-compiling at the moment, hence only
setting the target.
rustbuild: Add support for compiling Cargo
This commit adds support to rustbuild for compiling Cargo as part of the release
process. Previously rustbuild would simply download a Cargo snapshot and
repackage it. With this change we should be able to turn off artifacts from the
rust-lang/cargo repository and purely rely on the artifacts Cargo produces here.
The infrastructure added here is intended to be extensible to other components,
such as the RLS. It won't exactly be a one-line addition, but the addition of
Cargo didn't require too much hooplah anyway.
The process for release Cargo will now look like:
* The rust-lang/rust repository has a Cargo submodule which is used to build a
Cargo to pair with the rust-lang/rust release
* Periodically we'll update the cargo submodule as necessary on rust-lang/rust's
master branch
* When branching beta we'll create a new branch of Cargo (as we do today), and
the first commit to the beta branch will be to update the Cargo submodule to
this exact revision.
* When branching stable, we'll ensure that the Cargo submodule is updated and
then make a stable release.
Backports to Cargo will look like:
* Send a PR to cargo's master branch
* Send a PR to cargo's release branch (e.g. rust-1.16.0)
* Send a PR to rust-lang/rust's beta branch updating the submodule
* Eventually send a PR to rust-lang/rust's master branch updating the submodule
For reference, the process to add a new component to the rust-lang/rust release
would look like:
* Add `$foo` as a submodule in `src/tools`
* Add a `tool-$foo` step which compiles `$foo` with the specified compiler,
likely mirroring what Cargo does.
* Add a `dist-$foo` step which uses `src/tools/$foo` and the `tool-$foo` output
to create a rust-installer package for `$foo` likely mirroring what Cargo
does.
* Update the `dist-extended` step with a new dependency on `dist-$foo`
* Update `src/tools/build-manifest` for the new component.
This commit adds support to rustbuild for compiling Cargo as part of the release
process. Previously rustbuild would simply download a Cargo snapshot and
repackage it. With this change we should be able to turn off artifacts from the
rust-lang/cargo repository and purely rely on the artifacts Cargo produces here.
The infrastructure added here is intended to be extensible to other components,
such as the RLS. It won't exactly be a one-line addition, but the addition of
Cargo didn't require too much hooplah anyway.
The process for release Cargo will now look like:
* The rust-lang/rust repository has a Cargo submodule which is used to build a
Cargo to pair with the rust-lang/rust release
* Periodically we'll update the cargo submodule as necessary on rust-lang/rust's
master branch
* When branching beta we'll create a new branch of Cargo (as we do today), and
the first commit to the beta branch will be to update the Cargo submodule to
this exact revision.
* When branching stable, we'll ensure that the Cargo submodule is updated and
then make a stable release.
Backports to Cargo will look like:
* Send a PR to cargo's master branch
* Send a PR to cargo's release branch (e.g. rust-1.16.0)
* Send a PR to rust-lang/rust's beta branch updating the submodule
* Eventually send a PR to rust-lang/rust's master branch updating the submodule
For reference, the process to add a new component to the rust-lang/rust release
would look like:
* Add `$foo` as a submodule in `src/tools`
* Add a `tool-$foo` step which compiles `$foo` with the specified compiler,
likely mirroring what Cargo does.
* Add a `dist-$foo` step which uses `src/tools/$foo` and the `tool-$foo` output
to create a rust-installer package for `$foo` likely mirroring what Cargo
does.
* Update the `dist-extended` step with a new dependency on `dist-$foo`
* Update `src/tools/build-manifest` for the new component.
