This commit adjusts the missing field diagnostic logic for struct
expressions in typeck to improve the diagnostic when the missing
fields are inaccessible.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
Add CONST_ITEM_MUTATION lint
Fixes#74053Fixes#55721
This PR adds a new lint `CONST_ITEM_MUTATION`.
Given an item `const FOO: SomeType = ..`, this lint fires on:
* Attempting to write directly to a field (`FOO.field = some_val`) or
array entry (`FOO.array_field[0] = val`)
* Taking a mutable reference to the `const` item (`&mut FOO`), including
through an autoderef `FOO.some_mut_self_method()`
The lint message explains that since each use of a constant creates a
new temporary, the original `const` item will not be modified.
Improve unresolved use error message
"use of undeclared type or module `foo`" doesn't mention that it could be a crate.
This error can happen when users forget to add a dependency to `Cargo.toml`, so I think it's important to mention that it could be a missing crate.
I've used a heuristic based on Rust's naming conventions. It complains about an unknown type if the ident starts with an upper-case letter, and crate or module otherwise. It seems to work very well. The expanded error help covers both an unknown type and a missing crate case.
make `ConstEvaluatable` more strict
relevant zulip discussion: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/146212-t-compiler.2Fconst-eval/topic/.60ConstEvaluatable.60.20generic.20functions/near/204125452
Let's see how much this impacts. Depending on how this goes this should probably be a future compat warning.
Short explanation: we currently forbid anonymous constants which depend on generic types, e.g. `[0; std::mem::size_of::<T>]` currently errors.
We previously checked this by evaluating the constant and returned an error if that failed. This however allows things like
```rust
const fn foo<T>() -> usize {
if std::mem::size_of::<*mut T>() < 8 { // size of *mut T does not depend on T
std::mem::size_of::<T>()
} else {
8
}
}
fn test<T>() {
let _ = [0; foo::<T>()];
}
```
which is a backwards compatibility hazard. This also has worrying interactions with mir optimizations (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/74491#issuecomment-661890421) and intrinsics (#74538).
r? `@oli-obk` `@eddyb`
Add help note to unconstrained const parameter
Resolves#68366, since it is currently intended behaviour.
If demonstrating `T -> U` is injective, there should be an additional word that it is not **yet** supported.
r? @lcnr
Do not promote &mut of a non-ZST ever
Since ~pre-1.0~ 1.36, we have accepted code like this:
```rust
static mut TEST: &'static mut [i32] = {
let x = &mut [1,2,3];
x
};
```
I tracked it back to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/21744, but unfortunately could not find any discussion or RFC that would explain why we thought this was a good idea. And it's not, it breaks all sorts of things -- see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/75556.
To fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/75556, we have to stop promoting non-ZST mutable references no matter the context, which is what this PR does. It's a breaking change.
Notice that this still works, since it does not rely on promotion:
```rust
static mut TEST: &'static mut [i32] = &mut [0,1,2];
```
Cc `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`
Fixes#74053Fixes#55721
This PR adds a new lint `CONST_ITEM_MUTATION`.
Given an item `const FOO: SomeType = ..`, this lint fires on:
* Attempting to write directly to a field (`FOO.field = some_val`) or
array entry (`FOO.array_field[0] = val`)
* Taking a mutable reference to the `const` item (`&mut FOO`), including
through an autoderef `FOO.some_mut_self_method()`
The lint message explains that since each use of a constant creates a
new temporary, the original `const` item will not be modified.
Indent a note to make folding work nicer
Sublime Text folds code based on indentation. It maybe an unnecessary change, but does it look nicer after that ?
Move various ui const tests to `library`
Move:
- `src\test\ui\consts\const-nonzero.rs` to `library\core`
- `src\test\ui\consts\ascii.rs` to `library\core`
- `src\test\ui\consts\cow-is-borrowed` to `library\alloc`
Part of #76268
r? @matklad
Make `Ipv4Addr` and `Ipv6Addr` const tests unit tests under `library`
These tests are about the standard library, not the compiler itself, thus should live in `library`, see #76268.
Implementation of incompatible features error
Proposal of a new error: Incompatible features
This error should happen if two features which are not compatible are used together.
For now the only incompatible features are `const_generics` and `min_const_generics`
fixes#76280
Allow try blocks as the argument to return expressions
Fixes#76271
I don't think this needs to be edition-aware (phew) since `return try` in 2015 is also the start of an expression, just with a struct literal instead of a block (`return try { x: 4, y: 5 }`).
Move some Vec UI tests into alloc unit tests
A bit of work towards #76268, makes a number of the Vec UI tests that are simply running code into unit tests. Ensured that they are being run when testing liballoc locally.
Account for version number in NtIdent hack
Issue #74616 tracks a backwards-compatibility hack for certain macros.
This has is implemented by hard-coding the filenames and macro names of
certain code that we want to continue to compile.
However, the initial implementation of the hack was based on the
directory structure when building the crate from its repository (e.g.
`js-sys/src/lib.rs`). When the crate is build as a dependency, it will
include a version number from the clone from the cargo registry (e.g.
`js-sys-0.3.17/src/lib.rs`), which would fail the check.
This commit modifies the backwards-compatibility hack to check that
desired crate name (`js-sys` or `time-macros-impl`) is a prefix of the
proper part of the path.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76070#issuecomment-687215646
for more details.
Add a regression test for issue-72793
Adds a regression test for #72793, which is fixed by #75443. Note that this won't close the issue as the snippet still shows ICE with `-Zmir-opt-level=2`. But it makes sense to add a test anyway.
do not apply DerefMut on union field
This implements the part of [RFC 2514](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2514-union-initialization-and-drop.md) about `DerefMut`. Unlike described in the RFC, we only apply this warning specifically when doing `DerefMut` of a `ManuallyDrop` field; that is really the case we are worried about here.
@matthewjasper suggested I patch `convert_place_derefs_to_mutable` and `convert_place_op_to_mutable` for this, but I could not find anything to do in `convert_place_op_to_mutable` and this is sufficient to make the test pass. However, maybe there are some other cases this misses? I have no familiarity with this code.
This is a breaking change *in theory*, if someone used `ManuallyDrop<T>` in a union field and relied on automatic `DerefMut`. But on stable this means `T: Copy`, so the `ManuallyDrop` is rather pointless.
Cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/55149
Issue #74616 tracks a backwards-compatibility hack for certain macros.
This has is implemented by hard-coding the filenames and macro names of
certain code that we want to continue to compile.
However, the initial implementation of the hack was based on the
directory structure when building the crate from its repository (e.g.
`js-sys/src/lib.rs`). When the crate is build as a dependency, it will
include a version number from the clone from the cargo registry (e.g.
`js-sys-0.3.17/src/lib.rs`), which would fail the check.
This commit modifies the backwards-compatibility hack to check that
desired crate name (`js-sys` or `time-macros-impl`) is a prefix of the
proper part of the path.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76070#issuecomment-687215646
for more details.
Move:
- `src\test\ui\consts\const-nonzero.rs` to `library\core`
- `src\test\ui\consts\ascii.rs` to `library\core`
- `src\test\ui\consts\cow-is-borrowed` to `library\alloc`
Part of #76268
diagnostics: shorten paths of unique symbols
This is a step towards implementing a fix for #50310, and continuation of the discussion in [Pre-RFC: Nicer Types In Diagnostics - compiler - Rust Internals](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/pre-rfc-nicer-types-in-diagnostics/11139). Impressed upon me from previous discussion in #21934 that an RFC for this is not needed, and I should just come up with code.
The recent improvements to `use` suggestions that I've contributed have given rise to this implementation. Contrary to previous suggestions, it's rather simple logic, and I believe it only reduces the amount of cognitive load that a developer would need when reading type errors.
-----
If a symbol name can only be imported from one place, and as long as it was not glob-imported anywhere in the current crate, we can trim its printed path to the last component.
This has wide implications on error messages with types, for example, shortening `std::vec::Vec` to just `Vec`, as long as there is no other `Vec` importable from anywhere.
the test was sized to match external iteration only, since
vec's in-place collect now uses internal iteration we collect into
a different type now.
Note that any other try-fold based operation such as count() would also
have exceeded the type length limit for that iterator.
