Implement RFC 2945: "C-unwind" ABI
## Implement RFC 2945: "C-unwind" ABI
This branch implements [RFC 2945]. The tracking issue for this RFC is #74990.
The feature gate for the issue is `#![feature(c_unwind)]`.
This RFC was created as part of the ffi-unwind project group tracked at rust-lang/lang-team#19.
### Changes
Further details will be provided in commit messages, but a high-level overview
of the changes follows:
* A boolean `unwind` payload is added to the `C`, `System`, `Stdcall`,
and `Thiscall` variants, marking whether unwinding across FFI boundaries is
acceptable. The cases where each of these variants' `unwind` member is true
correspond with the `C-unwind`, `system-unwind`, `stdcall-unwind`, and
`thiscall-unwind` ABI strings introduced in RFC 2945 [3].
* This commit adds a `c_unwind` feature gate for the new ABI strings.
Tests for this feature gate are included in `src/test/ui/c-unwind/`, which
ensure that this feature gate works correctly for each of the new ABIs.
A new language features entry in the unstable book is added as well.
* We adjust the `rustc_middle::ty::layout::fn_can_unwind` function,
used to compute whether or not a `FnAbi` object represents a function that
should be able to unwind when `panic=unwind` is in use.
* Changes are also made to
`rustc_mir_build::build::should_abort_on_panic` so that the function ABI is
used to determind whether it should abort, assuming that the `panic=unwind`
strategy is being used, and no explicit unwind attribute was provided.
[RFC 2945]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2945-c-unwind-abi.md
This removes all of the code we had in place to work-around LLVM's
handling of forward progress. From this removal excluded is a workaround
where we'd insert a `sideeffect` into clearly infinite loops such as
`loop {}`. This code remains conditionally effective when the LLVM
version is earlier than 12.0, which fixed the forward progress related
miscompilations at their root.
### Changes
This commit implements unwind ABI's, specified in RFC 2945.
We adjust the `rustc_middle::ty::layout::fn_can_unwind` function,
used to compute whether or not a `FnAbi` object represents a
function that should be able to unwind when `panic=unwind` is in
use.
Changes are also made to
`rustc_mir_build::build::should_abort_on_panic` so that the
function ABI is used to determind whether it should abort, assuming
that the `panic=unwind` strategy is being used, and no explicit
unwind attribute was provided.
### Tests
Unit tests, checking that the behavior is correct for `C-unwind`,
`stdcall-unwind`, `system-unwind`, and `thiscall-unwind`, are
included. These alternative `unwind` ABI strings are specified in
RFC 2945, in the "_Other `unwind` ABI strings_" section.
Additionally, a test case is included to assert that the LLVM IR
generated for an external function defined with the `C-unwind` ABI
will be appropriately labeled with the `nounwind` LLVM attribute
when the `panic=abort` compilation flag is used.
### Ignore Directives
This commit uses `ignore-*` directives in two of our `*-unwind` ABI
test cases.
Specifically, the `stdcall-unwind` and `thiscall-unwind` test cases
ignore architectures that do not support `stdcall` and `thiscall`,
respectively.
These directives are cribbed from
`src/test/ui/c-variadic/variadic-ffi-1.rs` for `stdcall`, and
`src/test/ui/extern/extern-thiscall.rs` for `thiscall`.
Upgrade to LLVM 12
This implements the necessary adjustments to make rustc work with LLVM 12. I didn't encounter any major issues so far.
r? `@cuviper`
We escape certain LLVM-specific features when passing the inline
assembly string to the LLVM. Until now, however, there was no test
making sure this behaviour stays intact. This commit adds such a test!
This seems right, given that conceptually bools are unsigned, but the
implications of this change may have more action at distance that I'm
not sure how to exhaustively consider.
For instance there are a number of cases where code attaches range
metadata if `scalar.is_bool()` holds. Supposedly it would no longer be
attached to the `repr(i8)` enums? Though I'm not sure why booleans are
being special-cased here in the first place...
Fixes#80556
Add `as_rchunks` (and friends) to slices
`@est31` mentioned (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76354#issuecomment-717027175) that, for completeness, there needed to be an `as_chunks`-like method that chunks from the end (with the remainder at the beginning) like `rchunks` does.
So here's a PR for `as_rchunks: &[T] -> (&[T], &[[T; N]])` and `as_rchunks_mut: &mut [T] -> (&mut [T], &mut [[T; N]])`.
But as I was doing this and copy-pasting `from_raw_parts` calls, I thought that I should extract that into an unsafe method. It started out a private helper, but it seemed like `as_chunks_unchecked` could be reasonable as a "real" method, so I added docs and made it public. Let me know if you think it doesn't pull its weight.
This fixed things the last time I had a problem like this. And plausibly will here too -- the check it's failing on is for the high bit being set in the length of the slice, which is a check that's only in a debug_assert.
implement ptr::write without dedicated intrinsic
This makes `ptr::write` more consistent with `ptr::write_unaligned`, `ptr::read`, `ptr::read_unaligned`, all of which are implemented in terms of `copy_nonoverlapping`.
This means we can also remove `move_val_init` implementations in codegen and Miri, and its special handling in the borrow checker.
Also see [this Zulip discussion](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/ptr.3A.3Aread.20vs.20ptr.3A.3Awrite).
Remove unreachable panics from VecDeque::{front/back}[_mut]
`VecDeque`'s `front`, `front_mut`, `back` and `back_mut` methods are implemented in terms of the index operator, which causes these functions to contain [unreachable panic calls](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/MTnq1o).
This PR reimplements these methods in terms of `get[_mut]` instead.
Update tests to remove old numeric constants
Part of #68490.
Care has been taken to leave the old consts where appropriate, for testing backcompat regressions, module shadowing, etc. The intrinsics docs were accidentally referring to some methods on f64 as std::f64, which I changed due to being contrary with how we normally disambiguate the shadow module from the primitive. In one other place I changed std::u8 to std::ops since it was just testing path handling in macros.
For places which have legitimate uses of the old consts, deprecated attributes have been optimistically inserted. Although currently unnecessary, they exist to emphasize to any future deprecation effort the necessity of these specific symbols and prevent them from being accidentally removed.
Support repr(simd) on ADTs containing a single array field
This is a squash and rebase of `@gnzlbg's` #63531
I've never actually written code in the compiler before so just fumbled my way around until it would build 😅
I imagine there'll be some work we need to do in `rustc_codegen_cranelift` too for this now, but might need some input from `@bjorn3` to know what that is.
cc `@rust-lang/project-portable-simd`
-----
This PR allows using `#[repr(simd)]` on ADTs containing a single array field:
```rust
#[repr(simd)] struct S0([f32; 4]);
#[repr(simd)] struct S1<const N: usize>([f32; N]);
#[repr(simd)] struct S2<T, const N: usize>([T; N]);
```
This should allow experimenting with portable packed SIMD abstractions on nightly that make use of const generics.
Part of #68490.
Care has been taken to leave the old consts where appropriate, for testing backcompat regressions, module shadowing, etc. The intrinsics docs were accidentally referring to some methods on f64 as std::f64, which I changed due to being contrary with how we normally disambiguate the shadow module from the primitive. In one other place I changed std::u8 to std::ops since it was just testing path handling in macros.
For places which have legitimate uses of the old consts, deprecated attributes have been optimistically inserted. Although currently unnecessary, they exist to emphasize to any future deprecation effort the necessity of these specific symbols and prevent them from being accidentally removed.
* Reject use of parameters inside naked function body.
* Reject use of patterns inside function parameters, to emphasize role
of parameters a signature declaration (mirroring existing behaviour
for function declarations) and avoid generating code introducing
specified bindings.
Allow using `-Z fewer-names=no` to retain value names
Change `-Z fewer-names` into an optional boolean flag and allow using it
to either discard value names when true or retain them when false,
regardless of other settings.
Drop support for all cloudabi targets
`cloudabi` is a tier-3 target, and [it is no longer being maintained upstream][no].
This PR drops supports for cloudabi targets. Those targets are:
* aarch64-unknown-cloudabi
* armv7-unknown-cloudabi
* i686-unknown-cloudabi
* x86_64-unknown-cloudabi
Since this drops supports for a target, I'd like somebody to tag `relnotes` label to this PR.
Some other issues:
* The tidy exception for `cloudabi` crate is still remained because
* `parking_lot v0.9.0` and `parking_lot v0.10.2` depends on `cloudabi v0.0.3`.
* `parking_lot v0.11.0` depends on `cloudabi v0.1.0`.
[no]: https://github.com/NuxiNL/cloudabi#note-this-project-is-unmaintained
Change `-Z fewer-names` into an optional boolean flag and allow using it
to either discard value names when true or retain them when false,
regardless of other settings.
This also required adding a loop guard in case clone panics
Add specialization for copy
There is a better version for copy, so I've added specialization for that function
and hopefully that should speed it up even more.
Switch FromIter<slice::Iter> to use `to_vec`
Test different unrolling version for to_vec
Revert to impl
From benchmarking, it appears this version is faster
