Fix `thread::sleep` Duration-handling for ESP-IDF
Addresses the ESP-IDF specific aspect of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/129212
#### A short summary of the problems addressed by this PR:
================================================
1. **Problem 1** - the current implementation of `std:🧵:sleep` does not properly round up the passed `Duration`
As per the documentation of `std:🧵:sleep`, the implementation should sleep _at least_ for the provided duration, but not less. Since the minimum supported resolution of the `usleep` syscall which is used with ESP-IDF is one microsecond, this means that we need to round-up any sub-microsecond nanos to one microsecond. Moreover, in the edge case where the user had passed a duration of < 1000 nanos (i.e. less than one microsecond), the current implementation will _not_ sleep _at all_.
This is addressed by this PR.
2. **Problem 2** - the implementation of `usleep` on the ESP-IDF can overflow if the passed number of microseconds is >= `u32::MAX - 1_000_000`
This is also addressed by this PR.
Extra details for Problem 2:
`u32::MAX - 1_000_000` is chosen to accommodate for the longest possible systick on the ESP IDF which is 1000ms.
The systick duration is selected when compiling the ESP IDF FreeRTOS task scheduler itself, so we can't know it from within `STD`. The default systick duration is 10ms, and might be lowered down to 1ms. (Making it longer I have never seen, but in theory it can go up to a 1000ms max, even if obviously a one second systick is unrealistic - but we are paranoid in the PR.)
While the overflow is reported upstream in the ESP IDF repo[^1], I still believe we should workaround it in the Rust wrappers as well, because it might take time until it is fixed, and they might not fix it for all released ESP IDF versions.
For big durations, rather than calling `usleep` repeatedly on the ESP-IDF in chunks of `u32::MAX - 1_000_000`us, it might make sense to call instead with 1_000_000us (one second) as this is the max period that seems to be agreed upon as a safe max period in the `usleep` POSIX spec. On the other hand, that might introduce less precision (as we need to call more times `usleep` in a loop) and, we would be fighting a theoretical problem only, as I have big doubts the ESP IDF will stop supporting durations higher than 1_000_000us - ever - because of backwards compatibility with code which already calls `usleep` on the ESP IDF with bigger durations.
[^1]: https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/issues/14390
Add windows-targets crate to std's sysroot
With this PR, when backtrace is used as a crate from crates.io it will (once updated) use the real [windows-targets](https://crates.io/crates/windows-targets) crate. But when used from std it'll use std's replacement version.
This allows sharing our customized `windows_tagets::link!` macro between std proper and the backtrace crate when used as part of std, ensuring a consistent linking story. This will be especially important once we move to using [`raw-dylib`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/external-blocks.html#dylib-versus-raw-dylib) by default.
std: refactor UNIX random data generation
This PR makes a number of changes to the UNIX randomness implementation:
* Use `io::Error` for centralized error handling
* Move the file-fallback logic out of the `getrandom`-specific module
* Stop redefining the syscalls on macOS and DragonFly, they have appeared in `libc`
* Add a `OnceLock` to cache the random device file descriptor
Forbid unused unsafe in vxworks-specific std modules
Tracking issue #127747
Adding deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn) in VxWorks specific files did not cause any error.
Most of VxWorks falls back on Unix libraries. So we'll have to wait for Unix changes.
r? ```@workingjubilee```
This PR makes a number of changes to the UNIX randomness implementation:
* Use `io::Error` for centralized error handling
* Move the file-fallback logic out of the `getrandom`-specific module
* Stop redefining the syscalls on macOS and DragonFly, they have appeared in `libc`
* Add a `OnceLock` to cache the random device file descriptor
Revert recent changes to dead code analysis
This is a revert to recent changes to dead code analysis, namely:
* efdf219 Rollup merge of #128104 - mu001999-contrib:fix/128053, r=petrochenkov
* a70dc297a8 Rollup merge of #127017 - mu001999-contrib:dead/enhance, r=pnkfelix
* 31fe9628cf Rollup merge of #127107 - mu001999-contrib:dead/enhance-2, r=pnkfelix
* 2724aeaaeb Rollup merge of #126618 - mu001999-contrib:dead/enhance, r=pnkfelix
* 977c5fd419 Rollup merge of #126315 - mu001999-contrib:fix/126289, r=petrochenkov
* 13314df21b Rollup merge of #125572 - mu001999-contrib:dead/enhance, r=pnkfelix
There is an additional change stacked on top, which suppresses false-negatives that were masked by this work. I believe the functions that are touched in that code are legitimately unused functions and the types are not reachable since this `AnonPipe` type is not publically reachable -- please correct me if I'm wrong cc `@NobodyXu` who added these in ##127153.
Some of these reverts (#126315 and #126618) are only included because it makes the revert apply cleanly, and I think these changes were only done to fix follow-ups from the other PRs?
I apologize for the size of the PR and the churn that it has on the codebase (and for reverting `@mu001999's` work here), but I'm putting this PR up because I am concerned that we're making ad-hoc changes to fix bugs that are fallout of these PRs, and I'd like to see these changes reimplemented in a way that's more separable from the existing dead code pass. I am happy to review any code to reapply these changes in a more separable way.
cc `@mu001999`
r? `@pnkfelix`
Fixes#128272Fixes#126169
Add `#[must_use]` to some `into_raw*` functions.
cc #121287
r? ``@cuviper``
Adds `#[must_use = "losing the pointer will leak memory"]`[^1] to `Box::into_raw(_with_allocator)`, `Vec::into_raw_parts(_with_alloc)`, `String::into_raw_parts`[^2], and `rc::{Rc, Weak}::into_raw_with_allocator` (Rc's normal `into_raw` and all of `Arc`'s `into_raw*`s are already `must_use`).
Adds `#[must_use = "losing the raw <resource name may leak resources"]` to `IntoRawFd::into_raw_fd`, `IntoRawSocket::into_raw_socket`, and `IntoRawHandle::into_raw_handle`.
[^1]: "*will* leak memory" may be too-strong wording (since `Box`/`Vec`/`String`/`rc::Weak` might not have a backing allocation), but I left it as-is for simplicity and consistency.
[^2]: `String::into_raw_parts`'s `must_use` message is changed from the previous (possibly misleading) "`self` will be dropped if the result is not used".
android: Remove libstd hacks for unsupported Android APIs
Our minimum supported API version is 21, remove hacks to support older Android APIs.
try-job: arm-android
r? tgross35
