Most of the Rust community agrees that the vec! macro is clearer when
called using square brackets [] instead of regular brackets (). Most of
these ocurrences are from before macros allowed using different types of
brackets.
There is one left unchanged in a pretty-print test, as the pretty
printer still wants it to have regular brackets.
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 1665] which adds support for the
`#![windows_subsystem]` attribute. This attribute allows specifying either the
"windows" or "console" subsystems on Windows to the linker.
[RFC 1665]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1665-windows-subsystem.md
Previously all Rust executables were compiled as the "console" subsystem which
meant that if you wanted a graphical application it would erroneously pop up a
console whenever opened. When compiling an application, however, this is
undesired behavior and the "windows" subsystem is used instead to have control
over user interactions.
This attribute is validated, but ignored on all non-Windows platforms.
cc #37499
Add semicolon to "Maybe a missing `extern crate foo`" message
I had it a couple of times that I was missing the "extern crate" line
after I introduced a new dependency. So I copied the text from the
message and inserted it into the beginning of my code, only to find the
compiler complaining that I was missing the semicolon. (I forgot to add
it after the text that I had pasted.)
There's a similar message which does include the semicolon, namely
"help: you can import it into scope: `use foo::Bar;`". I think the two
messages should be consistent, so this change adds it for "extern
crate".
Fix bad error message with `::<` in types
Fix#36116.
Before:
```rust
error: expected identifier, found `<`
--> src/test/compile-fail/issue-36116.rs:16:52
|
16 | let f = Some(Foo { _a: 42 }).map(|a| a as Foo::<i32>);
| ^
error: chained comparison operators require parentheses
--> src/test/compile-fail/issue-36116.rs:16:52
|
16 | let f = Some(Foo { _a: 42 }).map(|a| a as Foo::<i32>);
| ^^^^^^
|
= help: use `::<...>` instead of `<...>` if you meant to specify type arguments
error: expected expression, found `)`
--> src/test/compile-fail/issue-36116.rs:16:57
|
16 | let f = Some(Foo { _a: 42 }).map(|a| a as Foo::<i32>);
| ^
error: expected identifier, found `<`
--> src/test/compile-fail/issue-36116.rs:20:17
|
20 | let g: Foo::<i32> = Foo { _a: 42 };
| ^
error: aborting due to 5 previous errors
```
After:
```rust
error: unexpected token: `::`
--> src/test/compile-fail/issue-36116.rs:16:50
|
16 | let f = Some(Foo { _a: 42 }).map(|a| a as Foo::<i32>);
| ^^
|
= help: use `<...>` instead of `::<...>` if you meant to specify type arguments
error: unexpected token: `::`
--> src/test/compile-fail/issue-36116.rs:20:15
|
20 | let g: Foo::<i32> = Foo { _a: 42 };
| ^^
|
= help: use `<...>` instead of `::<...>` if you meant to specify type arguments
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
```
Diagnostics for struct path resolution errors in resolve and typeck are unified.
Self type is treated as a type alias in few places (not reachable yet).
Unsafe cell is seen in constants even through type aliases.
All checks for struct paths in typeck work on type level.
Make sufficiently old or low-impact compatibility lints deny-by-default
Tracking issues are updated/created when necessary.
Needs crater run before proceeding.
r? @nikomatsakis
Implement field shorthands in struct literal expressions.
Implements #37340 in a straight-forward way: `Foo { x, y: f() }` parses as `Foo { x: x, y: f() }`.
Because of the added `is_shorthand` to `ast::Field`, this is `[syntax-breaking]` (cc @Manishearth).
* [x] Mark the fields as being a shorthand (the exact same way we do it in patterns), for pretty-printing.
* [x] Gate the shorthand syntax with `#![feature(field_init_shorthand)]`.
* [x] Don't parse numeric field as identifiers.
* [x] Arbitrary field order tests.
I had it a couple of times that I was missing the "extern crate" line
after I introduced a new dependency. So I copied the text from the
message and inserted it into the beginning of my code, only to find the
compiler complaining that I was missing the semicolon. (I forgot to add
it after the text that I had pasted.)
There's a similar message which does include the semicolon, namely
"help: you can import it into scope: `use foo::Bar;`". I think the two
messages should be consistent, so this change adds it for "extern
crate".
Add identifier to unused import warnings
Fix#37376.
For some reason, though, I'm getting warnings with messages like "76:9: 76:16: unused import: `self::g`" instead of "unused import: `self::g`". @pnkfelix Any ideas what might be causing this?
Convert byte literal pattern to byte array patterns when they are both
used together. so matching them is properly handled. I could've done the
conversion eagerly, but that could have caused a bad worst-case for
massive byte-array matches.
Fixes#18027.
Fixes#25051.
Fixes#26510.
check target abi support
This PR checks for each extern function / block whether the ABI / calling convention used is supported by the current target.
This was achieved by adding an `abi_blacklist` field to the target specifications, listing the calling conventions unsupported for that target.
Disallow Unsized Enums
Fixes#16812.
This PR is a potential fix for #16812, an issue which is reported [again](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/36801) and [again](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/36975), with over a dozen duplicates by now.
This PR is mainly meant to promoted discussion about the issue and the correct way to fix it.
This is a [breaking-change] since the error is now reported during wfchecking, so that even the definition of a (potentially) unsized enum will cause an error (whereas it would previously cause an ICE at trans time if the enum was used in an unsized manner).
Given a file like:
```rust
enum Test {
Variant,
Variant2 {a: u32},
}
fn main(){
let x = Test::Variant("Hello");
let y = Test::Variant2("World");
}
```
The errors now look this way:
```bash
error[E0423]: `Test::Variant2` is the name of a struct or struct variant, but this expression uses it like a function name
--> file3.rs:10:13
|
10 | let y = Test::Variant2("Hello");
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ struct called like a function
|
= help: did you mean to write: `Test::Variant2 { /* fields */ }`?
error: `Test::Variant` is being called, but it is not a function
--> file3.rs:9:13
|
9 | let x = Test::Variant("World");
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: did you mean to write: `Test::Variant`?
note: defined here
--> file3.rs:2:5
|
2 | Variant,
| ^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to previous error
```
syntax: Tweak path parsing logic
Associated paths starting with `<<` are parsed in patterns.
Paths like `self::foo::bar` are interpreted as paths and not as `self` arguments in methods (cc @matklad).
Now, I believe, *all* paths are consistently parsed greedily in case of ambiguity.
Detection of `&'a mut self::` requires pretty large (but still fixed) lookahead, so I had to increase the size of parser's lookahead buffer.
Curiously, if `lookahead_distance >= lookahead_buffer_size` was used previously, the parser hung forever, I fixed this as well, now it ICEs.
r? @jseyfried
