Add `needless_pass_by_ref_mut` lint
changelog: [`needless_pass_by_ref_mut`]: This PR add a new lint `needless_pass_by_ref_mut` which emits a warning in case a `&mut` function argument isn't used mutably. It doesn't warn on trait and trait impls functions.
Fixes#8863.
Don't lint manual_let_else in cases where ? would work
Don't lint `manual_let_else` where the question mark operator `?` would be sufficient, that is, mostly in cases like:
```Rust
let v = if let Some(v) = ex { v } else { return None };
```
Also, this PR emits the `question_mark` lint for `let...else` patterns that could be written with `?` (also, only `return None` like cases).
```
changelog: [`manual_let_else`]: don't lint in cases where question_mark already lints
changelog: [`question_mark`]: lint for `let Some(...) = ex else { return None };`
```
Fixes #8755
[`question_mark`]: don't lint inside of `try` block
Fixes#8628.
Diff looks a bit noisy because I had to move the two functions into an impl, because they now need to access the structs `try_block_depth` field to see if they're inside a try block.
changelog: [`question_mark`]: don't lint inside of `try` block
Lint `mem_forget` if any fields are `Drop`
Closes#9298
I think this way of doing it (`needs_drop`) should be fine.
---
changelog: Enhancement: [`mem_forget`]: Now lints on types with fields that implement `Drop`
[#10996](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10996)
[`redundant_closure_call`]: handle nested closures
Fixes#9956.
This ended up being a much larger change than I'd thought, and I ended up having to pretty much rewrite it as a late lint pass, because it needs access to certain things that I don't think are available in early lint passes (e.g. getting the parent expr). I think this'll be required to fi-x #10922 anyway, so this is probably fine.
(edit: had to write "fi-x" because "fix" makes github think that this PR fixes it, which it doesn't 😅 )
Previously, it would suggest changing `(|| || 42)()()` to `|| 42()`, which is a type error (it needs parens: `(|| 42)()`). In my opinion, though, the suggested fix should have really been `42`, so that's what this PR changes.
changelog: [`redundant_closure_call`]: handle nested closures and rewrite as a late lint pass
Don't linting `as_conversions` in proc macros
Don't linting `as_conversions` if code was generated by procedural macro.
This PR fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9657
I implemented the fix changing the lint code to be a `LateLintPass` in order to be able to use the `is_from_proc_macro` out of the box. If the reviwer thinks that it would be better to do the other way (implementing `WithSearchPat`) just let me know. I might need some help in implementing it for the `ustc_ast::ast::Expr`
changelog: [`as_conversions`] avoiding warnings in macro-generated code
Extend `explicit_iter_loop` and `explicit_into_iter_loop`
fixes#1518
Some included cleanups
* Split `for_loop` test into different files for each lint (partially).
* Move handling of some `into_iter` cases from `explicit_into_iter`.
---
changelog: Enhancement: [`explicit_iter_loop`]: Now also handles types that implement `IntoIterator`.
[#10416](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10416)
changelog: Sugg: [`explicit_into_iter_loop`]: The suggestion now works on mutable references.
[#10416](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10416)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
Add `needless_if` lint
first off: Sorry about the large diff. Seems a ton of tests do this (understandably so).
this is basically everything I wanted in #10868, while it doesn't lint *all* unnecessary empty blocks, it lints needless if statements; which are basically the crux of the issue (for me) anyway. I've committed code that includes this far too many times 😅 hopefully clippy can help me out soon
closes#10868
changelog: New lint [`needless_if`]
