Show multiline spans in full if short enough
When dealing with multiline spans that span few lines, show the complete span instead of restricting to the first character of the first line.
For example, instead of:
```
% ./rustc file2.rs
error[E0277]: the trait bound `{integer}: std::ops::Add<()>` is not satisfied
--> file2.rs:13:9
|
13 | foo(1 + bar(x,
| ^ trait `{integer}: std::ops::Add<()>` not satisfied
|
```
show
```
% ./rustc file2.rs
error[E0277]: the trait bound `{integer}: std::ops::Add<()>` is not satisfied
--> file2.rs:13:9
|
13 | foo(1 + bar(x,
| ________^ starting here...
14 | | y),
| |_____________^ ...ending here: trait `{integer}: std::ops::Add<()>` not satisfied
|
```
The [proposal in internals](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/proposal-for-multiline-span-comments/4242/6) outlines the reasoning behind this.
Setup two tasks, one of which only processes the signatures, in order to
isolate the typeck entries for signatures from those for bodies.
Fixes#36078Fixes#37720
This used to work with the rustc_clean attribute, but doesn't anymore
since my rebase; but I don't know enough about the type checking to find
out what's wrong. The dep graph looks like this:
ItemSignature(xxxx) -> CollectItem(xxxx)
CollectItem(xxxx) -> ItemSignature(xxxx)
ItemSignature(xxxx) -> TypeckItemBody(yyyy)
HirBody(xxxx) -> CollectItem(xxxx)
The cycle between CollectItem and ItemSignature looks wrong, and my
guess is the CollectItem -> ItemSignature edge shouldn't be there, but
I'm not sure how to prevent it.
Support `?Sized` in where clauses
Implemented as described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/20503#issuecomment-258677026 - `?Trait` bounds are moved on type parameter definitions when possible, reported as errors otherwise.
(It'd be nice to unify bounds and where clauses in HIR, but this is mostly blocked by rustdoc now - it needs to render bounds in pleasant way and the best way to do it so far is to mirror what was written in source code.)
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/20503
r? @nikomatsakis
don't double-apply variant padding to const enums
`build_const_struct` already returns the struct with padding - don't double-apply it in the `General` case.
This should hopefully be the last time we have this sort of bug.
Fixes#38002.
Beta-nominating because regression.
r? @eddyb
Note that the tests have been updated to initialize the local
variables; originally it was enough just to declare them.
Back when I started this, the `layout_cache` contained entries even
just for types that had been declared but not initialized. Apparently
things have changed in the interim so that if I want one of those
layouts to be computed, I need to actually initialize the value.
(Incidentally, this shows a weakness in the strategy of just walking
the `layout_cache`; the original strategy of using a MIR visitor would
probably have exhibited more robustness in terms of consistent output,
but it had other weaknesses so I chose not to reimplement it. At
least, not yet.)
----
Also, I have updated tests to avoid target-specific alignments.
Provide hint when cast needs a dereference
For a given code:
``` rust
vec![0.0].iter().map(|s| s as i16).collect::<Vec<i16>>();
```
display:
``` nocode
error: casting `&f64` as `i16` is invalid
--> file3.rs:2:35
|
2 | vec![0.0].iter().map(|s| s as i16).collect::<Vec<i16>>();
| - ^^^
| |
| did you mean `*s`?
```
instead of:
``` nocode
error: casting `&f64` as `i16` is invalid
--> <anon>:2:30
|
2 | vec![0.0].iter().map(|s| s as i16).collect();
| ^^^^^^^^
|
= help: cast through a raw pointer first
```
Fixes#37338.
Implement the `loop_break_value` feature.
This implements RFC 1624, tracking issue #37339.
- `FnCtxt` (in typeck) gets a stack of `LoopCtxt`s, which store the
currently deduced type of that loop, the desired type, and a list of
break expressions currently seen. `loop` loops get a fresh type
variable as their initial type (this logic is stolen from that for
arrays). `while` loops get `()`.
- `break {expr}` looks up the broken loop, and unifies the type of
`expr` with the type of the loop.
- `break` with no expr unifies the loop's type with `()`.
- When building MIR, loops no longer construct a `()` value at
termination of the loop; rather, the `break` expression assigns the
result of the loop.
- ~~I have also changed the loop scoping in MIR-building so that the test
of a while loop is not considered to be part of that loop. This makes
the rules consistent with #37360. The new loop scopes in typeck also
follow this rule. That means that `loop { while (break) {} }` now
terminates instead of looping forever. This is technically a breaking
change.~~
- ~~On that note, expressions like `while break {}` and `if break {}` no
longer parse because `{}` is interpreted as an expression argument to
`break`. But no code except compiler test cases should do that anyway
because it makes no sense.~~
- The RFC did not make it clear, but I chose to make `break ()` inside
of a `while` loop illegal, just in case we wanted to do anything with
that design space in the future.
This is my first time dealing with this part of rustc so I'm sure
there's plenty of problems to pick on here ^_^
When dealing with multiline spans that span few lines, show the complete
span instead of restricting to the first character of the first line.
For example, instead of:
```
% ./rustc foo.rs
error[E0277]: the trait bound `{integer}: std::ops::Add<()>` is not satisfied
--> foo.rs:13:9
|
13 | foo(1 + bar(x,
| ^ trait `{integer}: std::ops::Add<()>` not satisfied
|
```
show
```
% ./rustc foo.rs
error[E0277]: the trait bound `{integer}: std::ops::Add<()>` is not satisfied
--> foo.rs:13:9
|
13 | foo(1 + bar(x,
| ________^ starting here...
14 | | y),
| |_____________^ ...ending here: trait `{integer}: std::ops::Add<()>` not satisfied
|
```
This implements RFC 1624, tracking issue #37339.
- `FnCtxt` (in typeck) gets a stack of `LoopCtxt`s, which store the
currently deduced type of that loop, the desired type, and a list of
break expressions currently seen. `loop` loops get a fresh type
variable as their initial type (this logic is stolen from that for
arrays). `while` loops get `()`.
- `break {expr}` looks up the broken loop, and unifies the type of
`expr` with the type of the loop.
- `break` with no expr unifies the loop's type with `()`.
- When building MIR, `loop` loops no longer construct a `()` value at
termination of the loop; rather, the `break` expression assigns the
result of the loop. `while` loops are unchanged.
- `break` respects contexts in which expressions may not end with braced
blocks. That is, `while break { break-value } { while-body }` is
illegal; this preserves backwards compatibility.
- The RFC did not make it clear, but I chose to make `break ()` inside
of a `while` loop illegal, just in case we wanted to do anything with
that design space in the future.
This is my first time dealing with this part of rustc so I'm sure
there's plenty of problems to pick on here ^_^
Clean up `ast::Attribute`, `ast::CrateConfig`, and string interning
This PR
- removes `ast::Attribute_` (changing `Attribute` from `Spanned<Attribute_>` to a struct),
- moves a `MetaItem`'s name from the `MetaItemKind` variants to a field of `MetaItem`,
- avoids needlessly wrapping `ast::MetaItem` with `P`,
- moves string interning into `syntax::symbol` (`ast::Name` is a reexport of `symbol::Symbol` for now),
- replaces `InternedString` with `Symbol` in the AST, HIR, and various other places, and
- refactors `ast::CrateConfig` from a `Vec` to a `HashSet`.
r? @eddyb
