fix: Don't add reference when it isn't needed for the "Extract variable" assist
I.e. don't generate `let var_name = &foo()`. Because it always irritates me when I need to fix that.
Anything that creates a new value don't need a reference. That excludes mostly field accesses and indexing.
I had a thought that we can also not generate a reference for fields and indexing as long as the type is `Copy`, but sometimes people impl `Copy` even when they don't want to copy the values (e.g. a large type), so I didn't do that.
Fix incorrect symbol definitions in SCIP output
The SCIP output incorrectly marks some symbols as definitions because it doesn't account for the file ID when comparing the token's range to its definition's range.
This means that if a symbol is referenced in a file at the same position at which it is defined in another file, that reference will be marked as a definition. I was quite surprised by how common this is. For example, `PartialEq` is defined [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.80.1/library/core/src/cmp.rs#L273) and `uuid` references it [here](https://github.com/uuid-rs/uuid/blob/1.8.0/src/lib.rs#L329). And what do you know, they're both at offset 10083! In our large monorepo, this happens for basically every common stdlib type!
feat: Create an assist to convert closure to freestanding fn
The assist converts all captures to parameters.
Closes#17920.
This was more work than I though, since it has to handle a bunch of edge cases...
Based on #17941. Needs to merge it first.
internal: Avoid newlines in fetch errors
Most logs lines don't have newlines, ensure fetch errors follow this pattern. This makes it easier to see which log line is associated with the error.
Before:
2024-08-28T21:11:58.431856Z ERROR FetchWorkspaceError:
rust-analyzer failed to discover workspace
After:
2024-08-28T21:11:58.431856Z ERROR FetchWorkspaceError: rust-analyzer failed to discover workspace
Fix path to run clippy on rustdoc
Took me a while to find out that the path clippy expected was `src/tools/rustdoc` and not `src/librustdoc`. I think it makes more sense this way as most commands rely on source paths.
r? ```@Kobzol```
Update books
## rust-lang/book
4 commits in 04bc1396bb857f35b5dda1d773c9571e1f253304..e7d217be2a75ef1753f0988d6ccaba4d7e376259
2024-08-14 01:19:47 UTC to 2024-08-13 16:51:00 UTC
- Backport/forward port ch12 (rust-lang/book#4008)
- Found some more things to fix in ch7; I forgot to update the snapshot (rust-lang/book#4007)
- Remove redundant sentence. Send to nostarch (rust-lang/book#4006)
- Fix: typo (rust-lang/book#4003)
## rust-lang/edition-guide
5 commits in aeeb287d41a0332c210da122bea8e0e91844ab3e..eeba2cb9c37ab74118a4fb5e5233f7397e4a91f8
2024-08-19 23:28:06 UTC to 2024-08-15 15:12:33 UTC
- 2024: Add rustdoc combined doctests (rust-lang/edition-guide#320)
- Update for unsafe attributes stabilization (rust-lang/edition-guide#319)
- 2024: Add macro-fragment-specifiers. (rust-lang/edition-guide#312)
- Fix deprecated_safe_2024 link (rust-lang/edition-guide#317)
- Add 2024 unsafe functions (rust-lang/edition-guide#304)
## rust-embedded/book
1 commits in 019f3928d8b939ec71b63722dcc2e46330156441..ff5d61d56f11e1986bfa9652c6aff7731576c37d
2024-08-20 07:26:19 UTC to 2024-08-20 07:26:19 UTC
- Use aligned address to demonstrate HardFault (rust-embedded/book#374)
## rust-lang/nomicon
1 commits in 6ecf95c5f2bfa0e6314dfe282bf775fd1405f7e9..14649f15d232d509478206ee9ed5105641aa60d0
2024-08-14 14:49:09 UTC to 2024-08-14 14:49:09 UTC
- CI: Switch to merge queue (rust-lang/nomicon#459)
## rust-lang/reference
14 commits in 62cd0df95061ba0ac886333f5cd7f3012f149da1..0668397076da350c404dadcf07b6cbc433ad3743
2024-08-11 21:06:12 +0000 to 2024-08-27 21:47:20 +0000
- Update enum.md (rust-lang/reference#1354)
- Be consistent about how "Edition differences" is capitalized (rust-lang/reference#1586)
- Sync denied lints with upstream (rust-lang/reference#1589)
- const_eval: update for const-fn float stabilization (rust-lang/reference#1566)
- Add spec identifier syntax to destructors.md (rust-lang/reference#1571)
- Say that `pub(in path)` can't depend on `use` statements (rust-lang/reference#1559)
- bytes inside implicitly const-promoted expressions are immutable (rust-lang/reference#1554)
- Tweak `repr(transparent)` to mention requiring *at most* one non-1-ZST (rust-lang/reference#1568)
- operator expressions: add &raw (rust-lang/reference#1567)
- Rewrite the automatic std link translation, and switch to automatic links (rust-lang/reference#1578)
- Add some basic docs for unsafe attrs (rust-lang/reference#1539)
- don't capitalize Undefined Behavior (rust-lang/reference#1575)
- add the `const` operand to docs for inline assembly (rust-lang/reference#1556)
- Typo: 'a' to 'an' in type-coercions.md (rust-lang/reference#1572)
## rust-lang/rust-by-example
1 commits in 8f94061936e492159f4f6c09c0f917a7521893ff..859786c5bc99301bbc22fc631a5c2b341860da08
2024-08-26 10:30:48 UTC to 2024-08-26 10:30:48 UTC
- Update primitives.md with examples (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1878)
## rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide
7 commits in 43d83780db545a1ed6d45773312fc578987e3968..fa928a6d19e1666d8d811dfe3fd35cdad3b4e459
2024-08-26 14:46:50 UTC to 2024-08-12 21:07:49 UTC
- Fix x.py reference (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#2049)
- Update `stabilization_guide.md` (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#2034)
- Explain the internal `#[rustc_*]` TEST attributes used for debugging and inside tests (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#2046)
- missing char (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#2047)
- Replace direct http links to rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#2044)
- Update index.html, 39. The MIR: fix typo (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#2043)
- Update LLVM docs (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#2039)
Implement a first version of RFC 3525: struct target features
This PR is an attempt at implementing https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3525, behind a feature gate `struct_target_features`.
There's obviously a few tasks that ought to be done before this is merged; in no particular order:
- add proper error messages
- add tests
- create a tracking issue for the RFC
- properly serialize/deserialize the new target_features field in `rmeta` (assuming I even understood that correctly :-))
That said, as I am definitely not a `rustc` expert, I'd like to get some early feedback on the overall approach before fixing those things (and perhaps some pointers for `rmeta`...), hence this early PR :-)
Here's an example piece of code that I have been using for testing - with the new code, the calls to intrinsics get correctly inlined:
```rust
#![feature(struct_target_features)]
use std::arch::x86_64::*;
/*
// fails to compile
#[target_feature(enable = "avx")]
struct Invalid(u32);
*/
#[target_feature(enable = "avx")]
struct Avx {}
#[target_feature(enable = "sse")]
struct Sse();
/*
// fails to compile
extern "C" fn bad_fun(_: Avx) {}
*/
/*
// fails to compile
#[inline(always)]
fn inline_fun(_: Avx) {}
*/
trait Simd {
fn do_something(&self);
}
impl Simd for Avx {
fn do_something(&self) {
unsafe {
println!("{:?}", _mm256_setzero_ps());
}
}
}
impl Simd for Sse {
fn do_something(&self) {
unsafe {
println!("{:?}", _mm_setzero_ps());
}
}
}
struct WithAvx {
#[allow(dead_code)]
avx: Avx,
}
impl Simd for WithAvx {
fn do_something(&self) {
unsafe {
println!("{:?}", _mm256_setzero_ps());
}
}
}
#[inline(never)]
fn dosomething<S: Simd>(simd: &S) {
simd.do_something();
}
fn main() {
/*
// fails to compile
Avx {};
*/
if is_x86_feature_detected!("avx") {
let avx = unsafe { Avx {} };
dosomething(&avx);
dosomething(&WithAvx { avx });
}
if is_x86_feature_detected!("sse") {
dosomething(&unsafe { Sse {} })
}
}
```
Tracking:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/129107
I.e. don't generate `let var_name = &foo()`.
Anything that creates a new value don't need a reference. That excludes mostly field accesses and indexing.
I had a thought that we can also not generate a reference for fields and indexing as long as the type is `Copy`, but sometimes people impl `Copy` even when they don't want to copy the values (e.g. a large type), so I didn't do that.
interpret: do not make const-eval query result depend on tcx.sess
The check against calling functions with missing target features uses `tcx.sess` to determine which target features are available. However, this can differ between different crates in a crate graph, so the same const-eval query can come to different conclusions about whether a constant evaluates successfully or not -- which is bad, we should consistently get the same result everywhere.
const-eval: do not make UbChecks behavior depend on current crate's flags
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/129552
Let's see if we can get away with just always enabling these checks.
Stop storing a special inner body for the coroutine by-move body for async closures
...and instead, just synthesize an item which is treated mostly normally by the MIR pipeline.
This PR does a few things:
* We synthesize a new `DefId` for the by-move body of a closure, which has its `mir_built` fed with the output of the `ByMoveBody` MIR transformation, and some other relevant queries.
* This has the `DefKind::ByMoveBody`, which we use to distinguish it from "real" bodies (that come from HIR) which need to be borrowck'd. Introduce `TyCtxt::is_synthetic_mir` to skip over `mir_borrowck` which is called by `mir_promoted`; borrowck isn't really possible to make work ATM since it heavily relies being called on a body generated from HIR, and is redundant by the construction of the by-move-body.
* Remove the special `PassManager` hacks for handling the inner `by_move_body` stored within the coroutine's mir body. Instead, this body is fed like a regular MIR body, so it's goes through all of the `tcx.*_mir` stages normally (build -> promoted -> ...etc... -> optimized) ✨.
* Remove the `InstanceKind::ByMoveBody` shim, since now we have a "regular" def id, we can just use `InstanceKind::Item`. This also allows us to remove the corresponding hacks from codegen, such as in `fn_sig_for_fn_abi` ✨.
Notable remarks:
* ~~I know it's kind of weird to be using `DefKind::Closure` here, since it's not a distinct closure but just a new MIR body. I don't believe it really matters, but I could also use a different `DefKind`... maybe one that we could use for synthetic MIR bodies in general?~~ edit: We're doing this now.
Expand proc-macros in workspace root, not package root
Should fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/17748. The approach is generally not perfect though as rust-project.json projects don't benefit from this (still, nothing changes in that regard)
fix: Fix "Unwrap block" assist with block modifiers
The assist just assumes the `{` will be the first character, which led to strange outputs such as `nsafe {`.
Fixes#17964.
Add Trusty OS as tier 3 target
This PR adds support for the [Trusty secure operating system](https://source.android.com/docs/security/features/trusty) as a Tier 3 supported target. This upstreams [the patch that we have been using](https://cs.android.com/android/platform/superproject/+/master:external/rust/crates/libc/patches/trusty.patch;l=1;drc=122e586e93a534160230dc10ae3474cf31dd8f7f) internally. This also revives https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103895 which was closed due to inactivity, and is being resumed now that time allows.
And MCP has already been done for adding this platform: rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/568
# Target Tier Policy Acknowledgements
> A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target. (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
- Nicole LeGare (``@randomPoison)``
- Stephen Crane (``@rinon)``
- As a fallback trusty-dev-team@google.com can be contacted
> Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important even for a tier 3 target.
The two new Trusty targets, `aarch64-unknown-trusty` and `armv7-unknown-trusty` both follow the existing naming convention for similar targets.
> Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to disambiguate it.
👍
> Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for Rust developers or users.
There are no known legal issues or license incompatibilities.
> Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise participate in discussions.
👍
> Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3 target not implementing those portions.
This PR only adds the targets for the platform. `std` support will be added once platform support is added to the libc crate, which depends on the language targets being added to rustc.
> The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target, using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
👍
> Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via ``@)`` to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into such messages.
👍
> Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2 or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3 target.
👍
> Tier 3 targets must be able to produce assembly using at least one of rustc's supported backends from any host target. (Having support in a fork of the backend is not sufficient, it must be upstream.)
👍
miri weak memory emulation: put previous value into initial store buffer
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/2164 by doing a read before each atomic write so that we can initialize the store buffer. The read suppresses memory access hooks and UB exceptions, to avoid otherwise influencing the program behavior. If the read fails, we store that as `None` in the store buffer, so that when an atomic read races with the first atomic write to some memory and previously the memory was uninitialized, we can report UB due to reading uninit memory.
``@cbeuw`` this changes a bit the way we initialize the store buffers. Not sure if you still remember all this code, but if you could have a look to make sure this still makes sense, that would be great. :)
r? ``@saethlin``
More work on `zstd` compression
r? ``@Kobzol`` as we've discussed this.
This is a draft to show the current approach of supporting zstd in compiletest, and making the tests using it unconditional.
Knowing whether llvm/lld was built with `LLVM_ENABLE_ZSTD` is quite hard, so there are two strategies. There are details in the code, and we can discuss this approach. Until we know the config used to build CI artifacts, it seems our options are somewhat limited in any case.
zlib compression seems always enabled, so we only check this in its dedicated test, allowing the test to ignore errors due to zstd not being supported.
The zstd test is made unconditional in what it tests, by relying on `needs-llvm-zstd` to be ignored when `llvm.libzstd` isn't enabled in `config.toml`.
try-job: x86_64-gnu
try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: x86_64-gnu-distcheck
