Fix spacing and ordering of words in pretty printed Impl
Follow-up to #92238 fixing one of the FIXMEs.
```rust
macro_rules! repro {
($item:item) => {
stringify!($item)
};
}
fn main() {
println!("{}", repro!(impl<T> Struct<T> {}));
println!("{}", repro!(impl<T> const Trait for T {}));
}
```
Before: `impl <T> Struct<T> {}`
After: `impl<T> Struct<T> {}`
Before: `impl const <T> Trait for T {}` 😿
After: `impl<T> const Trait for T {}`
Support [x; n] expressions in concat_bytes!
Currently trying to use `concat_bytes!` with a repeating array value like `[42; 5]` results in an error:
```
error: expected a byte literal
--> src/main.rs:3:27
|
3 | let x = concat_bytes!([3; 4]);
| ^^^^^^
|
= note: only byte literals (like `b"foo"`, `b's'`, and `[3, 4, 5]`) can be passed to `concat_bytes!()`
```
This makes it so repeating array syntax can be used the same way normal arrays can be. The RFC doesn't explicitly mention repeat expressions, but it seems reasonable to allow them as well, since normal arrays are allowed.
It is possible to make the compiler get stuck compiling forever with `concat_bytes!([3; 999999999])`, but I don't think that's much of an issue since you can do that already with `const X: [u8; 999999999] = [3; 999999999];`.
Contributes to #87555.
[rustc_builtin_macros] add indices to format_foreign::printf::Substitution::Escape
Fixes#92267.
The problem was that the escape string "%%" does not need to appear at the very beginning of the format string, but
the iterator implementation assumed that it did.
The solution follows the pattern used by `format_foregin:🐚:Subtitution::Escape`: 8ed935e92d/compiler/rustc_builtin_macros/src/format_foreign.rs (L629)
Fix whitespace in pretty printed PatKind::Range
Follow-up to #92238 fixing one of the FIXMEs.
```rust
macro_rules! repro {
($pat:pat) => {
stringify!($pat)
};
}
fn main() {
println!("{}", repro!(0..=1));
}
```
Before: `0 ..=1`
After: `0..=1`
The canonical spacing applied by rustfmt has no space after the lower expr. Rustc's parser diagnostics also do not put a space there:
df96fb166f/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/pat.rs (L754)
Print space after formal generic params in fn type
Follow-up to #92238 fixing one of the FIXMEs.
```rust
macro_rules! repro {
($ty:ty) => {
stringify!($ty)
};
}
fn main() {
println!("{}", repro!(for<'a> fn(&'a u8)));
}
```
Before: `for<'a>fn(&'a u8)`
After: `for<'a> fn(&'a u8)`
The pretty printer's `print_formal_generic_params` already prints formal generic params correctly with a space, we just need to call it when printing BareFn types instead of reimplementing the printing incorrectly without a space.
83b15bfe1c/compiler/rustc_ast_pretty/src/pprust/state.rs (L1394-L1400)
They are also removed from the prelude as per the decision in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87228.
stdarch and compiler-builtins are updated to work with the new, stable
asm! and global_asm! macros.
Pretty print empty blocks as {}
**Example:**
```rust
macro_rules! p {
($e:expr) => {
println!("{}", stringify!($e));
};
($i:item) => {
println!("{}", stringify!($i));
};
}
fn main() {
p!(if true {});
p!(struct S {});
}
```
**Before:**
```console
if true { }
struct S {
}
```
**After:**
```console
if true {}
struct S {}
```
This affects [`dbg!`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/macro.dbg.html), as well as ecosystem uses of stringify such as in [`anyhow::ensure!`](https://docs.rs/anyhow/1/anyhow/macro.ensure.html). Printing a `{ }` in today's heavily rustfmt'd world comes out looking jarring/sloppy.
Emit description of the ambiguity as a note.
Co-authored-by: Noah Lev <camelidcamel@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Vadim Petrochenkov <vadim.petrochenkov@gmail.com>
avoid suggesting the same name
sort candidates
fix a message
use `opt_def_id` instead of `def_id`
move `find_similarly_named_module_or_crate` to rustc_resolve/src/diagnostics.rs
It was previously cached for modules loaded from `fn get_module`, but not for modules loaded from `fn build_reduced_graph_for_external_crate_res`.
This also makes all foreign modules use their real parent, span and expansion instead of possibly a parent/span/expansion of their reexport.
An ICE happening on attempt to decode expansions for foreign enums and traits is avoided.
Also local enums and traits are now added to the module map.
Fix linting when trailing macro expands to a trailing semi
When a macro is used in the trailing expression position of a block
(e.g. `fn foo() { my_macro!() }`), we currently parse it as an
expression, rather than a statement. As a result, we ended up
using the `NodeId` of the containing statement as our `lint_node_id`,
even though we don't normally do this for macro calls.
If such a macro expands to an expression with a `#[cfg]` attribute,
then the trailing statement can get removed entirely. This lead to
an ICE, since we were usng the `NodeId` of the expression to emit
a lint.
Ths commit makes us skip updating `lint_node_id` when handling
a macro in trailing expression position. This will cause us to
lint at the closest parent of the macro call.
When a macro is used in the trailing expression position of a block
(e.g. `fn foo() { my_macro!() }`), we currently parse it as an
expression, rather than a statement. As a result, we ended up
using the `NodeId` of the containing statement as our `lint_node_id`,
even though we don't normally do this for macro calls.
If such a macro expands to an expression with a `#[cfg]` attribute,
then the trailing statement can get removed entirely. This lead to
an ICE, since we were usng the `NodeId` of the expression to emit
a lint.
Ths commit makes us skip updating `lint_node_id` when handling
a macro in trailing expression position. This will cause us to
lint at the closest parent of the macro call.
