Permit ty::Bool in const generics for v0 mangling
This should unbreak using new-symbol-mangling = true in config.toml (once it lands in beta anyway).
Fixes#76365 (well, it will, but seems fine to close as soon as we have support)
r? @eddyb (for mangling) but I'm okay with some other reviewer too :)
Bypass const_item_mutation if const's type has Drop impl
Follow-up to #75573. This PR disables the const_item_mutation lint in cases that the const has a Drop impl which observes the mutation.
```rust
struct Log { msg: &'static str }
const LOG: Log = Log { msg: "" };
impl Drop for Log {
fn drop(&mut self) { println!("{}", self.msg); }
}
LOG.msg = "wow"; // prints "wow"
```
r? @Aaron1011
The previous error was confusing since it made it sound like you can't
link to items that are defined outside the current module.
Also suggested importing the item.
resolve: prohibit anon const non-static lifetimes
Fixes#75323, fixes#74447 and fixes#73375.
This PR prohibits non-static lifetimes in anonymous constants when only the `min_const_generics` feature is enabled. ~~To do so, `to_region_vid`'s `bug!` had to be changed into a delayed bug, which unfortunately required providing it a `TyCtxt`.~~
---
~~While I am happy with how the implementation of the error turned out in `rustc_passes::check_const`, emitting an error wasn't sufficient to avoid hitting the ICE later. I also tried implementing the error in `rustc_mir::transform::check_consts::validation` and that worked, but it didn't silence the ICE either. To silence the ICE, I changed it to a delayed bug which worked but was more invasive that I would have liked, and required I return an incorrect lifetime. It's possible that this check should be implemented earlier in the compiler to make the invasive changes unnecessary, but I wasn't sure where that would be and wanted to get some feedback first.~~
The approach taken by this PR has been changed to implement the error in name resolution, which ended up being much simpler.
cc @rust-lang/wg-const-eval
r? @lcnr
This commit modifies name resolution to emit an error when non-static
lifetimes are used in anonymous constants when the `min_const_generics`
feature is enabled.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
Disable the SimplifyArmIdentity mir-opt
The optimization still has some bugs that need to be worked out
such as #77359.
We can try re-enabling this again after the known issues are resolved.
r? `@oli-obk`
Related: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66741
Guarded with `#![feature(default_alloc_error_handler)]` a default
`alloc_error_handler` is called, if a custom allocator is used and no
other custom `#[alloc_error_handler]` is defined.
The panic message does not contain the size anymore, because it would
pull in the fmt machinery, which would blow up the code size
significantly.
rustc_metadata: Do not forget to encode inherent impls for foreign types
So I tried to move FFI interface for LLVM from `rustc_codegen_llvm` to `rustc_llvm` and immediately encountered this fascinating issue.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/46665.
Split sys_common::Mutex in StaticMutex and MovableMutex.
The (unsafe) `Mutex` from `sys_common` had a rather complicated interface. You were supposed to call `init()` manually, unless you could guarantee it was neither moved nor used reentrantly.
Calling `destroy()` was also optional, although it was unclear if 1) resources might be leaked or not, and 2) if `destroy()` should only be called when `init()` was called.
This allowed for a number of interesting (confusing?) different ways to use this `Mutex`, all captured in a single type.
In practice, this type was only ever used in two ways:
1. As a static variable. In this case, neither `init()` nor `destroy()` are called. The variable is never moved, and it is never used reentrantly. It is only ever locked using the `LockGuard`, never with `raw_lock`.
2. As a `Box`ed variable. In this case, both `init()` and `destroy()` are called, it will be moved and possibly used reentrantly.
No other combinations are used anywhere in `std`.
This change simplifies things by splitting this `Mutex` type into two types matching the two use cases: `StaticMutex` and `MovableMutex`.
The interface of both new types is now both safer and simpler. The first one does not call nor expose `init`/`destroy`, and the second one calls those automatically in its `new()` and `Drop` functions. Also, the locking functions of `MovableMutex` are no longer unsafe.
---
This will also make it easier to conditionally box mutexes later, by moving that decision into sys/sys_common. Some of the mutex implementations (at least those of Wasm and 'sys/unsupported') are safe to move, so wouldn't need a box. ~~(But that's blocked on #76932 for now.)~~ (See #77380.)
Refactor memchr to allow optimization
Closes#75659
The implementation already uses naive search if the slice if short enough, but the case is complicated enough to not be optimized away. This PR refactors memchr so that it exists early when the slice is short enough.
Codegen-wise, as shown in #75659, memchr was not inlined previously so the only way I could find to test this is to check if there is no memchr call. Let me know if there is a more robust solution here.
