Remove `-Ztime`
Because it has a lot of overlap with `-Ztime-passes` but is generally less useful. Plus some related cleanups.
Best reviewed one commit at a time.
r? `@davidtwco`
The compiler currently has `-Ztime` and `-Ztime-passes`. I've used
`-Ztime-passes` for years but only recently learned about `-Ztime`.
What's the difference? Let's look at the `-Zhelp` output:
```
-Z time=val -- measure time of rustc processes (default: no)
-Z time-passes=val -- measure time of each rustc pass (default: no)
```
The `-Ztime-passes` description is clear, but the `-Ztime` one is less so.
Sounds like it measures the time for the entire process?
No. The real difference is that `-Ztime-passes` prints out info about passes,
and `-Ztime` does the same, but only for a subset of those passes. More
specifically, there is a distinction in the profiling code between a "verbose
generic activity" and an "extra verbose generic activity". `-Ztime-passes`
prints both kinds, while `-Ztime` only prints the first one. (It took me
a close reading of the source code to determine this difference.)
In practice this distinction has low value. Perhaps in the past the "extra
verbose" output was more voluminous, but now that we only print stats for a
pass if it exceeds 5ms or alters the RSS, `-Ztime-passes` is less spammy. Also,
a lot of the "extra verbose" cases are for individual lint passes, and you need
to also use `-Zno-interleave-lints` to see those anyway.
Therefore, this commit removes `-Ztime` and the associated machinery. One thing
to note is that the existing "extra verbose" activities all have an extra
string argument, so the commit adds the ability to accept an extra argument to
the "verbose" activities.
Miri sync
This is a Miri sync created with my experimental fork of josh. We should probably not merge this yet, but we can use this to check if the sync looks the way it should.
r? `@oli-obk`
Package `rust-docs-json` into nightly components (take 3)
`dist` creates a `rust-docs-json.tar.xz` tarfile. But build-manifest expected it to be named `rust-docs-json-preview.tar.xz`. Change build-manifest to allow the name without the `-preview` suffix.
I haven't actually tested this :( build-manifest is a pain to run locally.
rust-lang/rust#100557 removed the `git-commit-hash` file and replaced it
with `git-commit-info`. However, build-manifest relies on the
`git-commit-hash` file being present, so this adds it back.
fix: use git-commit-info for version information
Fixes#33286.
Fixes#86587.
This PR changes the current `git-commit-hash` file that `./x.py` dist puts in the `rustc-{version}-src.tar.{x,g}z` to contain the hash, the short hash, and the commit date from which the tarball was created, assuming git was available when it was. It uses this for reading the version so that rustc has all the appropriate metadata.
# Testing
Testing this is kind of a pain. I did it with something like
```sh
./x.py dist # ensure that `ignore-git` is `false` in config.toml
cp ./build/dist/rustc-1.65.0-dev-src.tar.gz ../rustc-1.65.0-dev-src.tar.gz
cd .. && tar -xzf rustc-1.65.0-dev-src && cd rustc-1.65.0-dev-src
./x.py build
```
Then, the output of `rustc -vV` with the stage1 compiler should have the `commit-hash` and `commit-date` fields filled, rather than be `unknown`. To be completely sure, you can use `rustc --sysroot` with the stdlib that the original `./x.py dist` made, which will require that the metadata matches.
fix issue with x.py setup running into explicit panic
Fixes problem with [Issue #102555](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/102555) causing `x.py` setup to fail. Simply requires `rustfmt` be downloaded a little later.
Allow passing rustix_use_libc cfg using RUSTFLAGS
Before this would error with
```
error: unexpected `rustix_use_libc` as condition name
|
= note: `-D unexpected-cfgs` implied by `-D warnings`
= help: was set with `--cfg` but isn't in the `--check-cfg` expected names
```
I'm setting rustix_use_libc when testing bootstrapping rustc with cg_clif as I'm disabling inline asm here.
Change argument handling in `remote-test-server` and add new flags
This PR updates `remote-test-server` to add two new flags:
* `--sequential` disables parallel test execution, accepting one connection at the time instead. We need this for Ferrocene as one of our emulators occasionally deadlocks when running multiple tests in parallel.
* `--bind <ip:port>` allows customizing the IP and port `remote-test-server` binds to, rather than using the default value.
While I was changing the flags, and [after chatting on what to do on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/remote-test-server.20flags), I took this opportunity to cleanup argument handling in `remote-test-server`, which is a breaking change:
* The `verbose` argument has been renamed to the `--verbose` flag.
* The `remote` argument has been removed in favor of the `--bind 0.0.0.0:12345` flag. The only thing the argument did was to change the bound IP to 0.0.0.0, which can easily be replicated with `--bind` and also is not secure as our "remote" default.
I'm also open to keep the old arguments with deprecation warnings.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
`dist` creates a `rust-docs-json.tar.xz` tarfile. But build-manifest expected it to be named
`rust-docs-json-preview.tar.xz`. Change build-manifest to allow the name without the `-preview` suffix.
This also adds `rust-docs-json` to the `rust` component. I'm not quite sure why it exists,
but rustup uses it to determine which components are available.
Make the `c` feature for `compiler-builtins` an explicit opt-in
Its build script doesn't support cross-compilation. I tried fixing it, but the cc crate itself doesn't appear to support cross-compiling to windows either unless you use the -gnu toolchain:
```
error occurred: Failed to find tool. Is `lib.exe` installed?
```
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/101172.
The build script for `compiler_builtins` doesn't support cross-compilation. I tried fixing it, but the cc crate itself
doesn't appear to support cross-compiling to windows either unless you use the -gnu toolchain:
```
error occurred: Failed to find tool. Is `lib.exe` installed?
```
Rather than trying to fix it or special-case the platforms without bugs,
make it opt-in instead of automatic.
Before this would error with
```
error: unexpected `rustix_use_libc` as condition name
|
= note: `-D unexpected-cfgs` implied by `-D warnings`
= help: was set with `--cfg` but isn't in the `--check-cfg` expected names
```
I'm setting rustix_use_libc when testing bootstrapping rustc with cg_clif as I'm disabling inline asm here.
This restores functionality broken by #98483. Unfortunately, it doesn't
add a test to verify this works, but in this case we notice pretty
quickly as perf uses this functionality and so reports breakage
immediately after merging.
Distribute bootstrap in CI
This pre-compiles bootstrap from source and adds it to the existing `rust-dev` component. There are two main goals here:
1. Make it faster to build rust from source, both the first time and incrementally
2. Make it easier to add non-python entrypoints, since they can call out to bootstrap directly rather than having to figure out the right flags to pre-compile it. This second part is still in a bit of flux, see the tracking issue below for more information.
There are also several changes to make bootstrap able to run on a machine other than the one it was built (particularly around `config.src` and `config.out` detection). I (`@jyn514)` am slightly concerned these will regress unless tested - maybe we should add an automated test that runs bootstrap in a chroot or something? Unclear whether the effort is worth the test coverage.
Helps with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/94829.
Add `llvm-dis` to the set of tools in `ci-llvm`
The LLVM disassembler is needed for the test introduced in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97550.
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Distribute rust-docs-json via rustup.
I am not 100% sure on how to treat `rust-json-docs` in `target_host_combination`. I went along with a similar strategy to the one used for `rust-docs`, but looking for guidance there.
