The rustdoc JSON for
```
pub fn f(_: impl Clone) {}
```
will effectively be
```
pub fn f<impl Clone: Clone>(_: impl Clone)
```
where a synthetic generic parameter called `impl Clone` with generic
trait bound `Clone` is added to the function declaration.
The generated HTML filters out these generic parameters by doing
`self.params.iter().filter(|p| !p.is_synthetic_type_param())`, because
the synthetic generic parameter is not of interest to regular users.
For the same reason, we should expose whether or not a generic parameter
is synthetic or not also in the rustdoc JSON, so that rustdoc JSON
clients can also have the option to hide synthetic generic parameters.
src/test/rustdoc-json: Check for `struct_field`s in `variant_tuple_struct.rs`
The presence of `struct_field`s is being checked for already in
`variant_struct.rs`. We should also check for them in `variant_tuple_struct.rs`.
This PR is one small step towards resolving #92945.
Previously, rustdoc recorded lifetime bounds by rendering them into the
name of the lifetime parameter. Now, it leaves the name as the actual
name and instead records lifetime bounds in an `outlives` list, similar
to how type parameter bounds are recorded.
Rustdoc Json: Add tests for Reexports, and improve jsondocck
The two changes are orthognal, so you can land just one if you want, but the improved errors realy helped write the tests.
Notably does not have the case from #80664, but I want to have all the ajacent cases tested before starting work on that to ensure I dont break anything.
Improves #81359
cc ```@CraftSpider```
r? ```@jyn514```
```@rustbot``` modify labels: +A-testsuite +T-rustdoc +A-rustdoc-json
Previously, `JsonRenderer::after_krate` called `krate.version.clone()`.
The problem was it did that after the version was already moved into the
cache, so it would always be None. The fix was to get the version from
the cache instead.
Remove struct_type from union output
Also bumps the format number and adds a test
Rationale: It's illegal to have unions of the form `union Union(i32, f32);`, or `union Union;`. The struct_type field was recently removed from the rustdoc Union AST, at which time this field was changed to always just read "union". It makes sense to completely remove it, as it provides no information.
