Stabilize `..` in tuple (struct) patterns
I'd like to nominate `..` in tuple and tuple struct patterns for stabilization.
This feature is a relatively small extension to existing stable functionality and doesn't have known blockers.
The feature first appeared in Rust 1.10 6 months ago.
An example of use: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/36203
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/33627
r? @nikomatsakis
macros: improve shadowing checks
This PR improves macro-expanded shadowing checks to work with out-of-(pre)order expansion.
Out-of-order expansion became possible in #37084, so this technically a [breaking-change] for nightly.
The regression test from this PR is an example of code that would break.
r? @nrc
Fix ICE when querying DefId on Def::Err.
Also moves computations into check that `kind_id` is `Ok(_)`, which is in theory an optimization, though I expect it's minor.
Fixes#37534.
r? @eddyb.
rustc: Add knowledge of Windows subsystems.
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 1665] which adds support for the
`#![windows_subsystem]` attribute. This attribute allows specifying either the
"windows" or "console" subsystems on Windows to the linker.
[RFC 1665]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1665-windows-subsystem.md
Previously all Rust executables were compiled as the "console" subsystem which
meant that if you wanted a graphical application it would erroneously pop up a
console whenever opened. When compiling an application, however, this is
undesired behavior and the "windows" subsystem is used instead to have control
over user interactions.
This attribute is validated, but ignored on all non-Windows platforms.
cc #37499
detect extra region requirements in impls
The current "compare method" check fails to check for the "region obligations" that accrue in the fulfillment context. This branch switches that code to create a `FnCtxt` so that it can invoke the regionck code. Previous crater runs (I haven't done one with the latest tip) have found some small number of affected crates, so I went ahead and introduced a warning cycle. I will kick off a crater run with this branch shortly.
This is a [breaking-change] because previously unsound code was accepted. The crater runs also revealed some cases where legitimate code was no longer type-checking, so the branch contains one additional (but orthogonal) change. It improves the elaborator so that we elaborate region requirements more thoroughly. In particular, if we know that `&'a T: 'b`, we now deduce that `T: 'b` and `'a: 'b`.
I invested a certain amount of effort in getting a good error message. The error message looks like this:
```
error[E0276]: impl has stricter requirements than trait
--> traits-elaborate-projection-region.rs:33:5
|
21 | fn foo() where T: 'a;
| --------------------- definition of `foo` from trait
...
33 | fn foo() where U: 'a { }
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ impl has extra requirement `U: 'a`
|
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #18937 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/18937>
note: lint level defined here
--> traits-elaborate-projection-region.rs:12:9
|
12 | #![deny(extra_requirement_in_impl)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
Obviously the warning only prints if this is a _new_ error (that resulted from the bugfix). But all existing errors that fit this description are updated to follow the general template. In order to get the lint to preserve the span-labels and the error code, I separate out the core `Diagnostic` type (which encapsulates the error code, message, span, and children) from the `DiagnosticBuilder` (which layers on a `Handler` that can be used to report errors). I also extended `add_lint` with an alternative `add_lint_diagnostic` that takes in a full diagnostic (cc @jonathandturner for those changes). This doesn't feel ideal but feels like it's moving in the right direction =).
r? @pnkfelix
cc @arielb1
Fixes#18937
Use impl obligations as initial environment for specialization
This corrects a small regression in specialization that crept in, I think as part of the refactoring to introduce arenas. I also made an experiment (in the last commit) to cleanup the code to be more aggressive about normalization. As the commit log notes, I am not 100% sure that this is correct, but it feels safer, and I think that at worst it yields *more* ICEs (as opposed to admitting faulty code). I'll schedule a crater run to check beyond the testbase.
Fixes#37291.
r? @aturon
ICH: Hash expression spans if their source location is captured for panics.
Since the location of some expressions is captured in error message constants, it has an influence on machine code and consequently we need to take them into account by the incr. comp. hash. This PR makes this happen for `+, -, *, /, %` and for array indexing -- let me know if I forgot anything.
In the future we might want to change the codegen strategy for those error messages, so that they are stored in a separate object file with a stable symbol name, so that only this object file has to be regenerated when source locations change. This strategy would also eliminate unnecessary duplications due to monomorphization, as @arielb1 has pointed out on IRC. I opened https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/37512, so we don't forget about this.
r? @nikomatsakis
The new handling fixed a latent bug in the parser error handling where
it would only abort after the second error (when configured to stop
after the first error). This is because the check for `error_count != 0`
was occuring before the increment. Since the increment is tied to the
`emit()` call now this no longer occurs.
add more incremental reuse test cases
r? @michaelwoerister
This is basically a port of the "private method in impl". It works better when it's a top-level fn. =)
Most of the Rust community agrees that the vec! macro is clearer when
called using square brackets [] instead of regular brackets (). Most of
these ocurrences are from before macros allowed using different types of
brackets.
There is one left unchanged in a pretty-print test, as the pretty
printer still wants it to have regular brackets.
introing one-time diagnostics: only emit "lint level defined here" once
This is a revised resubmission of PR #34084 (which was closed due to inactivity on account of time constraints on the author's part).
---
We introduce a new `one_time_diagnostics` field on
`rustc::session::Session` to hold a hashset of diagnostic messages we've
set once but don't want to see again (as uniquified by span and message
text), "lint level defined here" being the motivating example dealt with
here.
This is in the matter of #24690.
---
r? @nikomatsakis
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 1665] which adds support for the
`#![windows_subsystem]` attribute. This attribute allows specifying either the
"windows" or "console" subsystems on Windows to the linker.
[RFC 1665]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1665-windows-subsystem.md
Previously all Rust executables were compiled as the "console" subsystem which
meant that if you wanted a graphical application it would erroneously pop up a
console whenever opened. When compiling an application, however, this is
undesired behavior and the "windows" subsystem is used instead to have control
over user interactions.
This attribute is validated, but ignored on all non-Windows platforms.
cc #37499
Move `CrateConfig` from `Crate` to `ParseSess`
This is a syntax-[breaking-change]. Most breakage can be fixed by removing a `CrateConfig` argument.
r? @eddyb
[1/n] Move the MIR map into the type context.
*This is part of a series ([prev]() | [next](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/37401)) of patches designed to rework rustc into an out-of-order on-demand pipeline model for both better feature support (e.g. [MIR-based](https://github.com/solson/miri) early constant evaluation) and incremental execution of compiler passes (e.g. type-checking), with beneficial consequences to IDE support as well.
If any motivation is unclear, please ask for additional PR description clarifications or code comments.*
<hr>
The first commit reorganizes the `rustc::mir` module to contain the MIR types directly without an extraneous `repr` module which serves no practical purpose but is rather an eyesore.
The second commit performs the actual move of the MIR map into the type context, for the purposes of future integration with requesting analysis/lowering by-products through `TyCtxt`.
Local `Mir` bodies need to be mutated by passes (hence `RefCell`), and at least one pass (`qualify_consts`) needs simultaneous access to multiple `Mir` bodies (hence arena-allocation).
`Mir` bodies loaded from other crates appear as if immutably borrowed (by `.borrow()`-ing one `Ref` and subsequently "leaking" it) to avoid, at least dynamically, *any* possibility of their local mutation.
One caveat is that lint passes can now snoop at the MIR (helpful) or even mutate it (dangerous).
However, lints are unstable anyway and we can find a way to deal with this in due time.
Future work will result in a tighter API, potentially hiding mutation *completely* outside of MIR passes.
rustc_typeck: Allow reification from fn item to unsafe ptr
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/1762.
I've never contributed to the compiler internals before-- apologies if I'm not going about this the right way.
Add semicolon to "Maybe a missing `extern crate foo`" message
I had it a couple of times that I was missing the "extern crate" line
after I introduced a new dependency. So I copied the text from the
message and inserted it into the beginning of my code, only to find the
compiler complaining that I was missing the semicolon. (I forgot to add
it after the text that I had pasted.)
There's a similar message which does include the semicolon, namely
"help: you can import it into scope: `use foo::Bar;`". I think the two
messages should be consistent, so this change adds it for "extern
crate".
Fix bad error message with `::<` in types
Fix#36116.
Before:
```rust
error: expected identifier, found `<`
--> src/test/compile-fail/issue-36116.rs:16:52
|
16 | let f = Some(Foo { _a: 42 }).map(|a| a as Foo::<i32>);
| ^
error: chained comparison operators require parentheses
--> src/test/compile-fail/issue-36116.rs:16:52
|
16 | let f = Some(Foo { _a: 42 }).map(|a| a as Foo::<i32>);
| ^^^^^^
|
= help: use `::<...>` instead of `<...>` if you meant to specify type arguments
error: expected expression, found `)`
--> src/test/compile-fail/issue-36116.rs:16:57
|
16 | let f = Some(Foo { _a: 42 }).map(|a| a as Foo::<i32>);
| ^
error: expected identifier, found `<`
--> src/test/compile-fail/issue-36116.rs:20:17
|
20 | let g: Foo::<i32> = Foo { _a: 42 };
| ^
error: aborting due to 5 previous errors
```
After:
```rust
error: unexpected token: `::`
--> src/test/compile-fail/issue-36116.rs:16:50
|
16 | let f = Some(Foo { _a: 42 }).map(|a| a as Foo::<i32>);
| ^^
|
= help: use `<...>` instead of `::<...>` if you meant to specify type arguments
error: unexpected token: `::`
--> src/test/compile-fail/issue-36116.rs:20:15
|
20 | let g: Foo::<i32> = Foo { _a: 42 };
| ^^
|
= help: use `<...>` instead of `::<...>` if you meant to specify type arguments
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
```
