debuginfo: add an unstable flag to write split DWARF to an explicit directory
Bazel requires knowledge of outputs from actions at analysis time, including file or directory name. In order to work around the lack of predictable output name for dwo files, we group the dwo files in a subdirectory of --out-dir as a post-processing step before returning control to bazel. Unfortunately some debugging workflows rely on directly opening the dwo file rather than loading the merged dwp file, and our trick of moving the files breaks those users. We can't just hardlink the file or copy it, because with remote build execution we wouldn't end up with the un-moved file copied back to the developer's workstation. As a fix, we add this unstable flag that causes dwo files to be written to a build-system-controllable location, which then lets bazel hoover up the dwo files, but the objects also have the correct path for the dwo files.
r? `@davidtwco`
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#146653 (improve diagnostics for empty attributes)
- rust-lang/rust#146987 (impl Ord for params and use unstable sort)
- rust-lang/rust#147101 (Use `Iterator::eq` and (dogfood) `eq_by` in compiler and library )
- rust-lang/rust#147123 (Fix removed version numbers of `doc_auto_cfg` and `doc_cfg_hide`)
- rust-lang/rust#147149 (add joboet to library review rotation)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
improve diagnostics for empty attributes
Adds a note about them not having any effect. This was previously done for `feature` attributes but no other attributes. In [converting the `feature` parser](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/146652) I removed that note. This PR adds it back in and makes it so all attributes benefit from it.
Not blocked on rust-lang/rust#146652, either can merge first
tests: Remove ignore-android directive for fixed issue
rust-lang/rust#120567 is marked as fixed, so let's see if we can remove the ignore directives tied to that issue.
<!-- Note to self: wait for https://github.com/rust-lang/team/pull/2002 -->
try-job: arm-android
Fix some crash-test directives
- 120175 fails to crash for non-ELF targets; presumably this wasn't noticed because the CI jobs don't enable rustc assertions for non-ELF hosts.
- 34127, 125722, and 131292 have `only-x86_64`, which is overly specific.
- Unnecessary x86 directives cause friction for contributors using aarch64, especially now that many PR CI jobs also use aarch64.
r? ghost
Detect tuple structs that are unconstructable due to re-export
When a tuple-struct is re-exported that has inaccessible fields at the `use` scope, the type's constructor cannot be accessed through that re-export. We now account for this case and extend the resulting resolution error. We also check if the constructor would be accessible directly, not through the re-export, and if so, we suggest using the full path instead.
```
error[E0423]: cannot initialize a tuple struct which contains private fields
--> $DIR/ctor-not-accessible-due-to-inaccessible-field-in-reexport.rs:12:33
|
LL | let crate::Foo(x) = crate::Foo(42);
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
note: the type is accessed through this re-export, but the type's constructor is not visible in this import's scope due to private fields
--> $DIR/ctor-not-accessible-due-to-inaccessible-field-in-reexport.rs:3:9
|
LL | pub use my_mod::Foo;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^
help: the type can be constructed directly, because its fields are available from the current scope
|
LL | let crate::Foo(x) = crate::my_mod::Foo(42);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
```
Fix#133343.
When a tuple-struct is re-exported that has inaccessible fields at the `use` scope, the type's constructor cannot be accessed through that re-export. We now account for this case and extend the resulting resolution error. We also check if the constructor would be accessible directly, not through the re-export, and if so, we suggest using the full path instead.
```
error[E0423]: cannot initialize a tuple struct which contains private fields
--> $DIR/ctor-not-accessible-due-to-inaccessible-field-in-reexport.rs:12:33
|
LL | let crate::Foo(x) = crate::Foo(42);
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
note: the type is accessed through this re-export, but the type's constructor is not visible in this import's scope due to private fields
--> $DIR/ctor-not-accessible-due-to-inaccessible-field-in-reexport.rs:3:9
|
LL | pub use my_mod::Foo;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^
help: the type can be constructed directly, because its fields are available from the current scope
|
LL | let crate::Foo(x) = crate::my_mod::Foo(42);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
```
Fix#133343.
Allow `&raw [mut | const]` for union field in safe code
fixesrust-lang/rust#141264
r? ``@Veykril``
Unresolved questions:
- [x] Any edge cases?
- [x] How this works with rust-analyzer (because all I've did is prevent compiler from emitting error in `&raw` context) (rust-lang/rust-analyzer#19867)
- [x] Should we allow `addr_of!` and `addr_of_mut!` as well? In current version they both (`&raw` and `addr_of!`) are allowed (They are the same)
- [x] Is chain of union fields is a safe? (Yes)
fix rebasing cycle heads when not reaching a fixpoint
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/232
annoyingly subtle, imagine the following proof tree
- A (no cycle head usages, final result Y)
- *ignored* B (depends on A with provisional result X)
- A (cycle, provisional result X)
- B (using the cache entry here incorrectly assumes A has final result X)
r? ``@BoxyUwU``
Clarified error note for usize range matching
Fixesrust-lang/rust#146476
This is kinda rough, but it gets the point across a little better and stays short.
Remove most `#[track_caller]` from allocating Vec methods
They cause significant binary size overhead while contributing little value.
closesrust-lang/rust#146963, see that issue for more details.
Fix doctest compilation time display
Fixesrust-lang/rust#146960.
Small corner case that happened in case everything went fine and there was only merged doctests.
r? lolbinarycat
re-order normalizations in run-make linker-warning test
otherwise a buildroot containing `rustc[^/_-]*` or `libpanic_abort` would be mangled before being replaced by the build root placeholder value..
e.g., running `./x.py test --verbose tests/run-make/linker-warning` with rustc checked out in ~/ext/rustcfoobar will result in
```
running 1 tests
test [run-make] tests/run-make/linker-warning ... FAILED
failures:
---- [run-make] tests/run-make/linker-warning stdout ----
------rustc stdout------------------------------
------rustc stderr------------------------------
------------------------------------------
error: rmake recipe failed to complete
status: exit status: 101
command: cd "/home/user/ext/rustcfoobar/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/run-make/linker-warning/rmake_out" && env -u RUSTFLAGS -u __RUSTC_DEBUG_ASSERTIONS_ENABLED -u __STD_DEBUG_ASSERTIONS_ENABLED AR="ar" BUILD_ROOT="/home/user/ext/rustcfoobar/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" CC="cc" CC_DEFAULT_FLAGS="-ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fPIC -m64" CXX="c++" CXX_DEFAULT_FLAGS="-ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fPIC -m64" HOST_RUSTC_DYLIB_PATH="/home/user/ext/rustcfoobar/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1/lib" LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/home/user/ext/rustcfoobar/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bootstrap-tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/deps:/home/user/ext/rustcfoobar/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib" LD_LIB_PATH_ENVVAR="LD_LIBRARY_PATH" LLVM_BIN_DIR="/home/user/ext/rustcfoobar/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/ci-llvm/bin" LLVM_COMPONENTS="<..>" LLVM_FILECHECK="/home/user/ext/rustcfoobar/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/ci-llvm/bin/FileCheck" NODE="/usr/bin/node" PYTHON="/usr/bin/python3" RUSTC="/home/user/ext/rustcfoobar/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1/bin/rustc" RUSTDOC="/home/user/ext/rustcfoobar/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1/bin/rustdoc" SOURCE_ROOT="/home/user/ext/rustcfoobar" TARGET="x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" TARGET_EXE_DYLIB_PATH="/home/user/ext/rustcfoobar/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib" "/home/user/ext/rustcfoobar/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/run-make/linker-warning/rmake"
stdout: none
--- stderr -------------------------------
thread 'main' panicked at /home/user/ext/rustcfoobar/tests/run-make/linker-warning/rmake.rs:74:14:
test failed: `short-error.txt` is different from `(linker error)`
--- short-error.txt
+++ (linker error)
``@@`` -1,6 +1,6 ``@@``
error: linking with `./fake-linker` failed: exit status: 1
|
- = note: "./fake-linker" "-m64" "/symbols.o" "<2 object files omitted>" "-Wl,--as-needed" "-Wl,-Bstatic" "/build-root/test/run-make/linker-warning/rmake_out/{libfoo,libbar}.rlib" "<sysroot>/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/{libstd-*,libpanic_unwind-*,libobject-*,libmemchr-*,libaddr2line-*,libgimli-*,libcfg_if-*,librustc_demangle-*,libstd_detect-*,libhashbrown-*,librustc_std_workspace_alloc-*,libminiz_oxide-*,libadler2-*,libunwind-*,liblibc-*,librustc_std_workspace_core-*,liballoc-*,libcore-*,libcompiler_builtins-*}.rlib" "-Wl,-Bdynamic" "-lgcc_s" "-lutil" "-lrt" "-lpthread" "-lm" "-ldl" "-lc" "-L" "/raw-dylibs" "-Wl,--eh-frame-hdr" "-Wl,-z,noexecstack" "-L" "/build-root/test/run-make/linker-warning/rmake_out" "-L" "<sysroot>/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib" "-o" "main" "-Wl,--gc-sections" "-pie" "-Wl,-z,relro,-z,now" "-nodefaultlibs" "run_make_error"
+ = note: "./fake-linker" "-m64" "/symbols.o" "<2 object files omitted>" "-Wl,--as-needed" "-Wl,-Bstatic" "/home/user/ext/rustc/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/run-make/linker-warning/rmake_out/{libfoo,libbar}.rlib" "<sysroot>/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/{libstd-*,libpanic_unwind-*,libobject-*,libmemchr-*,libaddr2line-*,libgimli-*,libcfg_if-*,librustc_demangle-*,libstd_detect-*,libhashbrown-*,librustc_std_workspace_alloc-*,libminiz_oxide-*,libadler2-*,libunwind-*,liblibc-*,librustc_std_workspace_core-*,liballoc-*,libcore-*,libcompiler_builtins-*}.rlib" "-Wl,-Bdynamic" "-lgcc_s" "-lutil" "-lrt" "-lpthread" "-lm" "-ldl" "-lc" "-L" "/raw-dylibs" "-Wl,--eh-frame-hdr" "-Wl,-z,noexecstack" "-L" "/home/user/ext/rustc/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/run-make/linker-warning/rmake_out" "-L" "<sysroot>/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib" "-o" "main" "-Wl,--gc-sections" "-pie" "-Wl,-z,relro,-z,now" "-nodefaultlibs" "run_make_error"
= note: some arguments are omitted. use `--verbose` to show all linker arguments
= note: error: baz
[..]
```
without this fix.
Note: this affected Debian's automated builds, since the buildroot contains the package name and version. while that particular issue got fixed in the meantime by accident by making the RE more strict in 77232fb935 , other buildroot paths are still affected without a full fix.
tests: relax expectations after llvm change 902ddda120a5
LLVM 22 is able to drop assumes that seem to not help further optimizations, which actually seems to dramatically _help_ further optimizations in some of our small test cases.
I'm a little unclear how to fix the last failure, in `tests/codegen-llvm/issues/issue-122600-ptr-discriminant-update.rs`:
```
-; Function Attrs: mustprogress nofree norecurse nosync nounwind willreturn memory(argmem: readwrite, inaccessiblemem: write) uwtable
+; Function Attrs: mustprogress nofree norecurse nosync nounwind nonlazybind willreturn memory(argmem: readwrite, inaccessiblemem: write) uwtable
define void ``@update(ptr`` noundef captures(none) %s) unnamed_addr #0 {
start:
- %_3.sroa.0.0.copyload = load i8, ptr %s, align 1
- %0 = trunc nuw i8 %_3.sroa.0.0.copyload to i1
- %1 = xor i1 %0, true
- tail call void ``@llvm.assume(i1`` %1)
store i8 1, ptr %s, align 1
ret void
}
```
I'm just not conversant enough in LLVM IR to follow the changes here.
``@rustbot`` label llvm-main
r? nikic
Introduce CoerceShared lang item and trait, and basic Reborrow tests
Part of rust-lang/rust#145612: This introduces the `CoerceShared` trait which is the `Reborrow` equivalent of a `&mut T` -> `&T` coercion. The trait has a `Target` GAT which makes this (currently) unique in the `core/src/marker.rs`; I'm not sure if this can be considered problematic. Maybe this is not the way such things should be done at the marker trait level? Or maybe it is fine.
Improtantly, this PR introduces a battery of basic `Reborrow` and `CoerceShared` tests. These test the very basics of the feature; custom marker types intended to have exclusive semantics (`Custom<'a>(PhantomData<&'a mut ()>)`), custom exclusive reference wrappers, and standard library exclusive reference wrappers (`Pin<&mut T>` and `Option<&mut T>`). None of these of course work since the implementation for `Reborrow` and `CoerceShared` is entirely missing, but this is the first step towards making these work.
Future PRs will introduce more tests, such as "recursive" reborrowing (ie. reborrowing structs that contain multiple reborrowable fields) and checks around the lifetime semantics of reborrowing ie. that a reborrow produces a new type with the same lifetime as the original.
