Move pointee_info_at from rustc_codegen_llvm to rustc_target.
Makes progress towards #56166.
This is a continuation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/57150.
@oli-obk Should I close the older PR?
[wg-async-await] Drop `async fn` arguments in async block
Fixes#54716.
This PR modifies the HIR lowering (and some other places to make this work) so that unused arguments to a async function are always dropped inside the async move block and not at the end of the function body.
```
async fn foo(<pattern>: <type>) {
async move {
}
} // <-- dropped as you "exit" the fn
// ...becomes...
fn foo(__arg0: <ty>) {
async move {
let <pattern>: <ty> = __arg0;
} // <-- dropped as you "exit" the async block
}
```
However, the exact ordering of drops is not the same as a regular function, [as visible in this playground example](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2015&gist=be39af1a58e5d430be1eb3c722cb1ec3) - I believe this to be an unrelated issue. There is a [Zulip topic](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/187312-t-compiler.2Fwg-async-await/topic/.2354716.20drop.20order) for this.
r? @cramertj
cc @nikomatsakis
This commit adds an `AsyncArgument` struct to the AST that contains the
generated argument and statement that will be used in HIR lowering, name
resolution and def collection.
Rename files about error codes
fixes#60017
This PR will be failed in tidy.
<details>
<summary>The log is here:</summary>
```
tidy check
tidy error: duplicate error code: 411
tidy error: Documents\GitHub\rust\src\librustc_resolve\diagnostics.rs:83: __diagnostic_used!(E0411);
tidy error: Documents\GitHub\rust\src\librustc_resolve\diagnostics.rs:84: err.code(DiagnosticId::Error("E0411".to_owned()));
tidy error: duplicate error code: 424
tidy error: Documents\GitHub\rust\src\librustc_resolve\diagnostics.rs:90: debug!("smart_resolve_path_fragment: E0424, source={:?}", source);
tidy error: Documents\GitHub\rust\src\librustc_resolve\diagnostics.rs:92: __diagnostic_used!(E0424);
tidy error: Documents\GitHub\rust\src\librustc_resolve\diagnostics.rs:93: err.code(DiagnosticId::Error("E0424".to_owned()));
some tidy checks failed
```
</details>
I'd like to fix this but I don't know what to do.
I will work on later. Please let me know if you have any solutions.
r? @petrochenkov
This commit removes the check that disallows the `#[non_exhaustive]`
attribute from being placed on enum variants and removes the associated
tests.
Further, this commit lowers the visibility of enum variant constructors
when the variant is marked as non-exhaustive.
Type dependent defs wrappers
First of all, forgive me if something would seem lame to you or I offend some rule (although I tried to read through docs), this is my first PR.
Issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/59094
This PR adds 3 helper methods to `TypeckTables`:
* `opt_type_dependent_def`
* `opt_type_dependent_def_id`
* `type_dependent_def_id`
I didn't add `type_dependent_def` as was proposed in the issue simply because it wasn't used anywhere in the code. Only non-option wrapped`type_dependent_defs()[]` accesses were found in clippy which always called `def_id()` on result.
Speaking of clippy, should I open separate PR in its own repo, given it's used as submodule here?
Sry it took me so long, as I said I'm new here and I had tough week :).
This commit makes two changes - separating the `NodeId` that identifies
an enum variant from the `NodeId` that identifies the variant's
constructor; and no longer creating a `NodeId` for `Struct`-style enum
variants and structs.
Separation of the variant id and variant constructor id will allow the
rest of RFC 2008 to be implemented by lowering the visibility of the
variant's constructor without lowering the visbility of the variant
itself.
No longer creating a `NodeId` for `Struct`-style enum variants and
structs mostly simplifies logic as previously this `NodeId` wasn't used.
There were various cases where the `NodeId` wouldn't be used unless
there was an unit or tuple struct or enum variant but not all uses of
this `NodeId` had that condition, by removing this `NodeId`, this must
be explicitly dealt with. This change mostly applied cleanly, but there
were one or two cases in name resolution and one case in type check
where the existing logic required a id for `Struct`-style enum variants
and structs.
Warning period for detecting nested impl trait
Here is some proposed code for making a warning period for the new checking of nested impl trait.
It undoes some of the corrective effects of PR #57730, by using boolean flags to track parts of the analysis that were previously skipped prior to PRs #57730 and #57981 landing.
Cc #57979
Instead of a sticky-boolean flag that would downgrade errors to
warnings during further recursion into the type (which is overly broad
because we were not missing errors at arbitrarily deep levels), this
instead tracks state closer to what the original bug actually was.
In particular, the actual original bug was that we were failing to
record the existence of an outer `impl Trait` solely when it occurred
as an *immediate child* during the walk of the child types in
`visit_generic_args`.
Therefore, the correct way to precisely model when that bug would
manifest itself (and thus downgrade the error-to-warning accordingly)
is to track when those outer `impl Trait` cases were previously
unrecorded.
That's what this code does, by storing a flag with the recorded outer
`impl Trait` indicating at which point in the compiler's control flow
it had been stored.
I will note that this commit passes the current test suite. A
follow-up commit will also include tests illustrating the cases that
this commit gets right (and were handled incorrectly by the previous
sticky boolean).
Refactor passes and pass execution to be more parallel
For `syntex_syntax` (with 16 threads and 8 cores):
- Cuts `misc checking 1` from `0.096s` to `0.08325s`.
- Cuts `misc checking 2` from `0.3575s` to `0.2545s`.
- Cuts `misc checking 3` from `0.34625s` to `0.21375s`.
- Cuts `wf checking` from `0.3085s` to `0.05025s`.
Reduces overall execution time for `syntex_syntax` (with 8 threads and cores) from `4.92s` to `4.34s`.
Subsumes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/58494
Blocked on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/58250
r? @michaelwoerister
