run-make-support: adjust assertion printing, add some basic sanity checks
cc ``@Noratrieb``
I think we may have unintentionally regressed this recently and double-printed (or printed even when the assertions didn't fail). This PR should condition the detail dumps only when the assertions fail.
Added some basic sanity checks for the assertions helpers except for the directory comparisons. That particular helper is not robust against symlinks, and I intend to address it in a follow-up (issue is #135037).
r? bootstrap (or compiler)
Do the same thing as gcc, which use the vendor `mti` to mark
the toolchain as MIPS32r2 default.
We support both big endian and little endian flavor:
mips-mti-none-elf
mipsel-mti-none-elf
Try to write the panic message with a single `write_all` call
This writes the panic message to a buffer before writing to stderr. This allows it to be printed with a single `write_all` call, preventing it from being interleaved with other outputs. It also adds newlines before and after the message ensuring that only the panic message will have its own lines.
Before:
```
thread 'thread 'thread 'thread 'thread '<unnamed>thread 'thread 'thread 'thread '<unnamed><unnamed>thread '<unnamed>' panicked at ' panicked at <unnamed><unnamed><unnamed><unnamed><unnamed>' panicked at <unnamed>' panicked at src\heap.rssrc\heap.rs'
panicked at ' panicked at ' panicked at ' panicked at ' panicked at src\heap.rs' panicked at src\heap.rs::src\heap.rssrc\heap.rssrc\heap.rssrc\heap.rssrc\heap.rs:src\heap.rs:455455:::::455:455::455455455455455:455:99:::::9:9:
:
999:
999:
assertion failed: size <= (*queue).block_size:
:
assertion failed: size <= (*queue).block_size:
assertion failed: size <= (*queue).block_size:
:
:
assertion failed: size <= (*queue).block_sizeassertion failed: size <= (*queue).block_sizeassertion failed: size <= (*queue).block_size
assertion failed: size <= (*queue).block_size
assertion failed: size <= (*queue).block_sizeassertion failed: size <= (*queue).block_sizeerror: process didn't exit successfully: `target\debug\direct_test.exe` (exit code: 0xc0000409, STATUS_STACK_BUFFER_OVERRUN)
```
After:
```
thread '<unnamed>' panicked at src\heap.rs:455:9:
assertion failed: size <= (*queue).block_size
thread '<unnamed>' panicked at src\heap.rs:455:9:
assertion failed: size <= (*queue).block_size
thread '<unnamed>' panicked at src\heap.rs:455:9:
assertion failed: size <= (*queue).block_size
error: process didn't exit successfully: `target\debug\direct_test.exe` (exit code: 0xc0000409, STATUS_STACK_BUFFER_OVERRUN)
```
---
try-jobs: x86_64-gnu-llvm-18
I expected this to be faster (due to less allocations and better cache locality), but benchmarked it is not (neither it is slower). Memory usage, however, drops by ~50mb (of `analysis-stats .`). I guess tt construction is just not hot.
This also simplifies using even less memory for token trees by compressing equal span, which I plan to do right after.
Some workflows are more easily expressed with a flat tt, while some are better expressed with a tree. With the right helpers, though (which was mostly a matter of trial and error), even the worst workflows become very easy indeed.
