Check code blocks tags
Fixes#71347.
Explanations here: I realized recently that it was a common issue to confuse/misspell tags on code blocks. This is actually quite a big issue since it generally ends up in a code blocks being ignored since it's not being considered as a rust one. With this new warning, users will at least be notified about it.
PS: some improvements can be done on the error rendering but considering how big the PR already is, I think it's better to do it afterwards.
r? @ollie27
cc @rust-lang/rustdoc
In the code, test, and docs, because it makes it much easier to find
things.
Other than adding the comments about alphabetical order, this commit
only moves things around.
With the exception of `-C no-redzone`, because that could take a value
before this PR.
This partially undoes one of the earlier commits in this PR, which added
the ability to take a value to all boolean options that lacked it.
The help output for these options looks like this:
```
-C no-vectorize-slp=val -- disable LLVM's SLP vectorization pass
```
The "=val" part is a lie, but hopefully this will be fixed in the future.
For all `-C` and `-Z` options that have them.
The commit also rewords a few options to make them clearer, mostly by
avoiding the word "don't".
It also removes the listed default for `-Cinline-threshold`, which is
incorrect -- that option doesn't have a static default.
This lets us specify the default at the options declaration point,
instead of using `.unwrap(default)` or `None | Some(default)` at some
use point far away. It also makes the code more concise.
Currently, if you give a bogus value like
`-Zsanitizer-memory-track-origins=99` you get this incorrect error:
```
error: debugging option `sanitizer-memory-track-origins` takes no value
```
This commit fixes it so it gives this instead:
```
error: incorrect value `99` for debugging option `sanitizer-memory-track-origins` - 0, 1, or 2 was expected
```
The commit also makes `parse_sanitizer_memory_track_origins` more
readable.
They now all accept yes/no/y/n/on/off values. (Previously only some of
them did.)
This commit also makes `parse_bool` and `parse_opt_bool` more concise
and readable, and adds some helpful comments to some functions.
Add hash of source files in debug info
LLVM supports placing the hash of source files inside the debug info.
This information can be used by a debugger to verify that the source code matches
the executable.
This change adds support for both hash algorithms supported by LLVM, MD5 and SHA1, controlled by a target option.
* DWARF only supports MD5
* LLVM IR supports MD5 and SHA1 (and SHA256 in LLVM 11).
* CodeView (.PDB) supports MD5, SHA1, and SHA256.
Fixes#68980.
Tracking issue: #70401
rustc dev guide PR with further details: https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/623
Make the rustc respect the `-C codegen-units` flag in incremental mode.
This PR implements (the as of yet unapproved) major change proposal at https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/245. See the description there for background and rationale.
The changes are pretty straightforward and should be easy to rebase if the proposal gets accepted at some point.
r? @nikomatsakis cc @pnkfelix
Add `-Z dump-mir-dataflow` flag for dumping dataflow results visualization
Previously, to visualize the results of a MIR dataflow pass, one had to add a `#[rustc_mir(borrowck_graphviz_postflow)]` attribute to functions of interest. However, there is no way to specify this attribute on closures and generators, so it was impossible to view results for these MIR bodies.
This PR adds a flag, `-Z dump-mir-dataflow`, which will output the dataflow results for any functions specified in `-Z dump-mir` to the output directory specified by `-Z dump-mir-dir`. This behavior is modeled on the `-Z dump-mir-graphviz` flag.
Before this commit `-C codegen-units` would just get silently be
ignored if `-C incremental` was specified too. After this commit
one can control the number of codegen units generated during
incremental compilation. The default is rather high at 256, so most
crates won't see a difference unless explicitly opting into a lower
count.
use is_empty() instead of len comparison (clippy::len_zero)
use if let instead of while let loop that never loops (clippy::never_loop)
remove redundant returns (clippy::needless_return)
remove redundant closures (clippy::redundant_closure)
use if let instead of match and wildcard pattern (clippy::single_match)
don't repeat field names redundantly (clippy::redundant_field_names)
Implement -Zlink-native-libraries
This implements a flag `-Zlink-native-libraries=yes/no`. If set to true/yes, or unspecified, then
native libraries referenced via `#[link]` attributes will be put on the linker line (ie, unchanged
behaviour).
If `-Zlink-native-libraries=no` is specified then rustc will not add the native libraries to the link
line. The assumption is that the outer build system driving the build already knows about the native
libraries and will specify them to the linker directly (for example via `-Clink-arg=`).
Addresses issue #70093
This implements a flag `-Zlink-native-libraries=yes/no`. If set to true/yes, or unspecified, then
native libraries referenced via `#[link]` attributes will be put on the linker line (ie, unchanged
behaviour).
If `-Zlink-native-libraries=no` is specified then rustc will not add the native libraries to the link
line. The assumption is that the outer build system driving the build already knows about the native
libraries and will specify them to the linker directly (for example via `-Clink-arg=`).
Addresses issue #70093
Specifically, remove both `-Z no_integrated_as` and
`TargetOptions::no_integrated_as`. The latter was only used for the
`msp430_none_elf` platform, for which it's no longer required.
`-C incremental` was introduced over two years ago. `-Z incremental` was
kept for transitioning, but it's been long enough now that it should be
ok to remove it.
Because it uses `parse_bool` and defaults to true, it is actually
impossible to set it to false. Inverting its sense to `-Z
no-generate-arange-section` makes it usable.
