Update LLVM to 21.1.3
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/146742.
After rust-lang/rust#146124, we need more space to run x86_64-gnu-distcheck if building LLVM from source. According to the building log, the space freed by `free-disk-space-linux.sh` is not entirely available.
```
You are running out of disk space.
The runner will stop working when the machine runs out of disk space.
Free space left: 98 MB
disk usage:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/root 72G 43G 29G 60% /
tmpfs 7.9G 84K 7.9G 1% /dev/shm
tmpfs 3.2G 1.2M 3.2G 1% /run
tmpfs 5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock
/dev/sda16 881M 60M 760M 8% /boot
/dev/sda15 105M 6.2M 99M 6% /boot/efi
/dev/sdb1 74G 28K 70G 1% /mnt
tmpfs 1.6G 12K 1.6G 1% /run/user/1001
```
Add tidy to the target of ./x check
## Context
Discussion: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/tidy.20isn't.20in.20.2E.2Fx.20check/with/544323712
Currently `tidy` (src/tools/tidy) is not included in the list of `./x check`. It means that rust-analyzer doesn't work for codes in the directory if you use `./x check` as the analyzer on your IDE.
## Change
This PR adds src/tools/tidy into the target of `./x check`. It enables rust-analyzer highlight errors/warns on all codes in the directory.
Note that since tidy is implicitly checked by `./x test tidy`, this new check is off by default.
Don't unconditionally build alloc for `no-std` targets
It's possible for targets to only support `core` and not `alloc`. Instead of building alloc unconditionally, pass a list of crates to build into `std_cargo`, and only pass `-p alloc` if the list of crates wasn't already filtered to a subset.
The original use case was to reuse `std_cargo` for a rustc_driver that doesn't emit metadata. But this seems like a reasonable change regardless.
Perform unused assignment and unused variables lints on MIR.
Rebase of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/101500
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/51003.
The first commit moves detection of uninhabited types from the current liveness pass to MIR building.
In order to keep the same level of diagnostics, I had to instrument MIR a little more:
- keep for which original local a guard local is created;
- store in the `VarBindingForm` the list of introducer places and whether this was a shorthand pattern.
I am not very proud of the handling of self-assignments. The proposed scheme is in two parts: first detect probable self-assignments, by pattern matching on MIR, and second treat them specially during dataflow analysis. I welcome ideas.
Please review carefully the changes in tests. There are many small changes to behaviour, and I'm not sure all of them are desirable.
This commit adds src/tools/tidy into `./x check`. It enables rust-analyzer hightlights errors/warns on all codes in src/tools/tidy.
Since tidy is implicitly checked by `./x test tidy`, this new check is off by default.
Currently x.py help (or x.py --help) builds bootstrap binary everytime, but it delays printing help.
This change saves the current top level help text into a file. x.py help prints the file and doesn't touch bootstrap binary.
x.py test bootstrap checks if the file is up to date.
Note that subcommand level helps (e.g., x.py check --help) aren't saved.
Update cargo submodule
22 commits in 801d9b4981dd07e3aecdca1ab86834c13615737e..81c3f77a467359c8be6bc747dc93ec66a6e4ce11
2025-10-04 13:30:15 +0000 to 2025-10-10 18:41:02 +0000
- docs(changelog): literal host-tuple support (rust-lang/cargo#16033)
- refactor: Define cargo script's target-dir using build-dir templating (rust-lang/cargo#16073)
- feat(build-dir): Reorganize build-dir layout (rust-lang/cargo#15947)
- refactor: unflatten `(String, Def)` to `ConfigValue` (rust-lang/cargo#16084)
- fix(tree): Switch from `--depth public` to `--edges public` (rust-lang/cargo#16081)
- docs(guide): Point out tools for reducing dependencies (rust-lang/cargo#16078)
- Allow to rustfix unused_variables lint. (rust-lang/cargo#16082)
- Fix test that assumes `CARGO_CFG_TARGET_FAMILY` is a single value (rust-lang/cargo#16079)
- Fix regression that swallowed json diagnostic explanations (rust-lang/cargo#16075)
- docs(ref): fix link to clippy incompatible_msrv lint (rust-lang/cargo#16077)
- Convert a few more diagnostics to reports (rust-lang/cargo#16066)
- fix(support): Add track_caller to know the actual failure (rust-lang/cargo#16069)
- fix(add): Report a missing source error for workspace dependencies (rust-lang/cargo#16063)
- fix(script): Default bin.name to package.name (rust-lang/cargo#16064)
- refactor(gctx): ConfigValue getter cleanup (rust-lang/cargo#16067)
- Fix unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn for Windows (rust-lang/cargo#16058)
- Consider public dependencies when choosing a version in cargo add (rust-lang/cargo#1… (rust-lang/cargo#15966)
- docs: clarify panic-immediate-abort can be used in config (rust-lang/cargo#16054)
- fix(timings): compute codegen start time to draw dep lines (rust-lang/cargo#16055)
- chore: Added tracing span for build script execution (rust-lang/cargo#16053)
- test: null-terminated path for reserved windows name detection (rust-lang/cargo#16052)
- feat (publish): deprecate `--token` option (rust-lang/cargo#16046)
r? ghost
Remove StatementKind::Deinit.
It is a remnant from the time we deaggreated MIR.
Now, it is only constructed by the `LargeEnums` MIR pass, which is disabled by default.
compiletest: Use the same directive lines for EarlyProps and ignore/only/needs
Currently we load each discovered test file to scan it for directives once for EarlyProps parsing, then reload and scan it once *per revision* for ignore processing. If a revision is not ignored, we then reload and scan it again during actual execution.
That's a bit silly, so this PR tries to reduce the number of unnecessary file loads and line scans for directive parsing, by reusing the same collection of `DirectiveLine` values for EarlyProps and for each revision's ignores.
Each individual directive still needs to be re-parsed a bunch of times, but those steps can at least avoid scanning the whole file, or having to split out names from values.
---
There's more that could be done after this, such as only doing known-directive checks once per file, or embedding file paths in each `DirectiveLine`, but I decided to stop here to allow review in modest chunks.
r? jieyouxu
Promote armv7a-none-eabihf to Tier 2
This PR promotes armv7a-none-eabihf to Tier 2, to join armv7r-none-eabihf and armv7a-none-eabi. I believe it was simply an oversight that it wasn't made Tier 2 before, as most Armv7-A targets have an FPU and it often makes sense to use it.
This PR wil be rebased once https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/146419 completes the queue.
> - A tier 2 target must have value to people other than its maintainers. (It may
> still be a niche target, but it must not be exclusively useful for an
> inherently closed group.)
The `armv7a-none-eabihf` target is for all Arm Cortex-A processors (either 32-bit only, or in 32-bit mode) where the user wants to use the FPU.
>- A tier 2 target must have a designated team of developers (the "target
> maintainers") available to consult on target-specific build-breaking issues,
> or if necessary to develop target-specific language or library implementation
> details. This team must have at least 2 developers.
The Embedded Devices Working Group's Arm Team have just started maintaining this target.
> - The target must not place undue burden on Rust developers not specifically
> concerned with that target. Rust developers are expected to not gratuitously
> break a tier 2 target, but are not expected to become experts in every tier 2
> target, and are not expected to provide target-specific implementations for
> every tier 2 target.
This target is highly similar to a number of existing Tier 2 targets, including `armv7r-none-eabihf` and `armv7a-none-eabi` and so it should not add undue burden.
> - The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how
> to build for the target using cross-compilation, and explaining how to run
> tests for the target. If at all possible, this documentation should show how
> to run Rust programs and tests for the target using emulation, to allow
> anyone to do so. If the target cannot be feasibly emulated, the documentation
> should explain how to obtain and work with physical hardware, cloud systems,
> or equivalent.
https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/platform-support/armv7a-none-eabi.html was added in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/146419/. It covers the `-eabi` and the `-eabihf` targets.
> - The target must document its baseline expectations for the features or
> versions of CPUs, operating systems, libraries, runtime environments, and
> similar.
I believe it does.
> - If introducing a new tier 2 or higher target that is identical to an existing
> Rust target except for the baseline expectations for the features or versions
> of CPUs, operating systems, libraries, runtime environments, and similar,
> then the proposed target must document to the satisfaction of the approving
> teams why the specific difference in baseline expectations provides
> sufficient value to justify a separate target.
It uses very similar FPUs to `armv7r-none-eabihf` but is otherwise the same as `armv7a-none-eabi`.
> - Tier 2 targets must not leave any significant portions of `core` or the
> standard library unimplemented or stubbed out, unless they cannot possibly be
> supported on the target.
It has a full libcore, as per the other arm*-none-* targets.
> - The code generation backend for the target should not have deficiencies that
> invalidate Rust safety properties, as evaluated by the Rust compiler team.
It should be the same backend as `armv7r-none-eabihf` and friends, except for FPU support, which is already covered in `thumbv8m.main-none-eabihf`. There are no issues that I know of.
> - If the target supports C code, and the target has an interoperable calling
> convention for C code, the Rust target must support that C calling convention
> for the platform via `extern "C"`. The C calling convention does not need to
> be the default Rust calling convention for the target, however.
The ABI is EABI, the same as many other Arm targets.
> - The target must build reliably in CI, for all components that Rust's CI
> considers mandatory.
The https://github.com/rust-embedded/cortex-ar repository has been changed in https://github.com/rust-embedded/cortex-ar/pull/57 to build this target with `-Zbuild-std=core`. Locally it seems fine.
> - The approving teams may additionally require that a subset of tests pass in
> CI, such as enough to build a functional "hello world" program, `./x.py test
> --no-run`, or equivalent "smoke tests". In particular, this requirement may
> apply if the target builds host tools, or if the tests in question provide
> substantial value via early detection of critical problems.
There are no no-std tests in the tree that I'm aware of.
> - Building the target in CI must not take substantially longer than the current
> slowest target in CI, and should not substantially raise the maintenance
> burden of the CI infrastructure. This requirement is subjective, to be
> evaluated by the infrastructure team, and will take the community importance
> of the target into account.
Building libcore is quite fast.
> - Tier 2 targets should, if at all possible, support cross-compiling. Tier 2
> targets should not require using the target as the host for builds, even if
> the target supports host tools.
It does.
> - In addition to the legal requirements for all targets (specified in the tier
> 3 requirements), because a tier 2 target typically involves the Rust project
> building and supplying various compiled binaries, incorporating the target
> and redistributing any resulting compiled binaries (e.g. built libraries,
> host tools if any) must not impose any onerous license requirements on any
> members of the Rust project, including infrastructure team members and those
> operating CI systems. This is a subjective requirement, to be evaluated by
> the approving teams.
Just libcore required (and liballoc). No known issues here.
> - Tier 2 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or
> other developers in the community, to ensure that tests pass for the target.
Noted
> - The target maintainers should regularly run the testsuite for the target
The https://github.com/rust-embedded/cortex-ar repository will be changed to use the rustup component when available.
> and should fix any test failures in a reasonably timely fashion.
Noted
Promote armv8r-none-eabihf target to Tier 2
This PR promotes armv8r-none-eabihf to Tier 2, joining armv7r-none-eabi, armv7r-none-eabihf and armv7a-none-eabi.
This PR wil be rebased once https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/146419 completes the queue.
> - A tier 2 target must have value to people other than its maintainers. (It may
> still be a niche target, but it must not be exclusively useful for an
> inherently closed group.)
The `armv8r-none-eabihf` target is for the Arm Cortex-R52 processor, as found in a number of Automotive SoCs that have just been released, or are about to be released. Currently SoCs are available from NXP and Renesas.
>- A tier 2 target must have a designated team of developers (the "target
> maintainers") available to consult on target-specific build-breaking issues,
> or if necessary to develop target-specific language or library implementation
> details. This team must have at least 2 developers.
The Embedded Devices Working Group's Arm Team have just started maintaining this target.
> - The target must not place undue burden on Rust developers not specifically
> concerned with that target. Rust developers are expected to not gratuitously
> break a tier 2 target, but are not expected to become experts in every tier 2
> target, and are not expected to provide target-specific implementations for
> every tier 2 target.
This target is highly similar to a number of existing Tier 2 targets, including `armv7r-none-eabihf` and so it should not add undue burden.
> - The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how
> to build for the target using cross-compilation, and explaining how to run
> tests for the target. If at all possible, this documentation should show how
> to run Rust programs and tests for the target using emulation, to allow
> anyone to do so. If the target cannot be feasibly emulated, the documentation
> should explain how to obtain and work with physical hardware, cloud systems,
> or equivalent.
https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/platform-support/armv8r-none-eabihf.html exists and was updated in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/146419/
> - The target must document its baseline expectations for the features or
> versions of CPUs, operating systems, libraries, runtime environments, and
> similar.
I believe it does.
> - If introducing a new tier 2 or higher target that is identical to an existing
> Rust target except for the baseline expectations for the features or versions
> of CPUs, operating systems, libraries, runtime environments, and similar,
> then the proposed target must document to the satisfaction of the approving
> teams why the specific difference in baseline expectations provides
> sufficient value to justify a separate target.
The Armv8-R architecture introduces a new FPU type, the fp-armv8, and so this requires a unique target.
> - Tier 2 targets must not leave any significant portions of `core` or the
> standard library unimplemented or stubbed out, unless they cannot possibly be
> supported on the target.
It has a full libcore, as per the other arm*-none-* targets.
> - The code generation backend for the target should not have deficiencies that
> invalidate Rust safety properties, as evaluated by the Rust compiler team.
It should be the same backend as `armv7r-none-eabihf` and friends, except for FPU support, which is already covered in `thumbv8m.main-none-eabihf`. There are no issues that I know of.
> - If the target supports C code, and the target has an interoperable calling
> convention for C code, the Rust target must support that C calling convention
> for the platform via `extern "C"`. The C calling convention does not need to
> be the default Rust calling convention for the target, however.
The ABI is EABI, the same as many other Arm targets.
> - The target must build reliably in CI, for all components that Rust's CI
> considers mandatory.
The https://github.com/rust-embedded/cortex-ar repository regularly builds this target with `-Zbuild-std=core` and it seems fine.
> - The approving teams may additionally require that a subset of tests pass in
> CI, such as enough to build a functional "hello world" program, `./x.py test
> --no-run`, or equivalent "smoke tests". In particular, this requirement may
> apply if the target builds host tools, or if the tests in question provide
> substantial value via early detection of critical problems.
There are no no-std tests in the tree that I'm aware of.
> - Building the target in CI must not take substantially longer than the current
> slowest target in CI, and should not substantially raise the maintenance
> burden of the CI infrastructure. This requirement is subjective, to be
> evaluated by the infrastructure team, and will take the community importance
> of the target into account.
Building libcore is quite fast.
> - Tier 2 targets should, if at all possible, support cross-compiling. Tier 2
> targets should not require using the target as the host for builds, even if
> the target supports host tools.
It does.
> - In addition to the legal requirements for all targets (specified in the tier
> 3 requirements), because a tier 2 target typically involves the Rust project
> building and supplying various compiled binaries, incorporating the target
> and redistributing any resulting compiled binaries (e.g. built libraries,
> host tools if any) must not impose any onerous license requirements on any
> members of the Rust project, including infrastructure team members and those
> operating CI systems. This is a subjective requirement, to be evaluated by
> the approving teams.
Just libcore required (and liballoc). No known issues here.
> - Tier 2 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or
> other developers in the community, to ensure that tests pass for the target.
Noted
> - The target maintainers should regularly run the testsuite for the target
The https://github.com/rust-embedded/cortex-ar repository will be changed to use the rustup component when available.
> and should fix any test failures in a reasonably timely fashion.
Noted
compiletest: Isolate public APIs and minimize public surface area
As part of my ongoing efforts to improve directive parsing, I would like to be able to make internal changes without worrying about whether they're going to break the rustdoc-gui-test tool. That tool currently uses compiletest as a dependency to help with directive parsing.
This PR therefore isolates all of compiletest's public APIs into two dedicated modules, one used by rustdoc-gui-test, and one used by the compiletest binary in `compiletest/src/bin/main.rs`.
All other modules (and crate-root items) are then made non-`pub` to achieve the API isolation. Doing so reveals some unused items, which have been removed.
(To reduce the amount of immediate textual churn, this PR does not comprehensively replace `pub` with `pub(crate)` throughout the whole crate; that could be done in a follow-up PR.)
---
Ideally, rustdoc-gui-test would not depend on compiletest at all, but properly fixing that is out of scope for this PR.
- rust-lang/rust#143827
r? jieyouxu
bootstrap: add `Builder::rustc_cmd` that includes the lib path
When building with `rust.rpath = false`, every `rustc` invocation needs
to include the library path as well. I particularly ran into this in
`generate_target_spec_json_schema` when testing 1.91-beta in Fedora,
where we do disable rpath for our system builds. The new helper function
will hopefully encourage the right thing going forward.
Port the implemention of SIMD intrinsics from Miri to const-eval
Ported the implementation of most SIMD intrinsics from Miri to rustc_const_eval. Remaining are
- Math functions (as per `@RalfJung's` suggestions)
- FMA (non-deterministic)
- Funnel Shifts (not implemented in Miri yet)
- Unordered reduction intrinsics (not implemented in Miri yet)
All APIs used from outside the compiletest library crate have been isolated to
the `cli` and `rustdoc_gui_test` modules, so no other items need to be publicly
exported.
rename `select_where_possible` and `select_all_or_error`
r? `@lcnr`
I find that people get confused by what these methods do. The verb "select" is not really that helpful and is just a reference to somewhat of an implementation detail of the trait solvers that doesn't even apply to most obligation kinds.
I went with `try_evaluate_obligations` and `evaluate_obligations_error_on_ambiguity`. This maintains consistency with the new solvers `evalute_goal` entry point. it's unfortunate that we say obligations rather than goals but this maintains consistency with `register_obligation` functions which I think is a good thing. In the long term possibly we rename `Obligation` or `Goal` 🤷♀️
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#146865 (kcfi: only reify trait methods when dyn-compatible)
- rust-lang/rust#147205 (Add a new `wasm32-wasip3` target to Rust)
- rust-lang/rust#147322 (cg_llvm: Consistently import `llvm::Type` and `llvm::Value`)
- rust-lang/rust#147398 (Fix; correct placement of type inference error for method calls)
- rust-lang/rust#147410 (Update `S-waiting-on-team` refs to new `S-waiting-on-{team}` labels)
- rust-lang/rust#147422 (collect-license-metadata: Print a diff of the expected output)
- rust-lang/rust#147431 (compiletest: Read the whole test file before parsing directives)
- rust-lang/rust#147433 (Fix doc comment)
Failed merges:
- rust-lang/rust#147390 (Use globals instead of metadata for std::autodiff)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
compiletest: Read the whole test file before parsing directives
Few tests are larger than a handful of kilobytes, and nowadays we scan the whole file for directives anyway, so there's little reason not to just read the whole thing up-front.
This avoids having to deal with I/O within `iter_directives`, which should make it easier to overhaul directive processing.
r? jieyouxu
