Implement `//@ needs-target-std` compiletest directive
Closesrust-lang/rust#141863.
Needed to unblock rust-lang/rust#139244 and rust-lang/rust#141856.
### Summary
This PR implements a `//@ needs-target-std` compiletest directive that gates test execution based on whether the target supports std or not. For some cases, this should be preferred over e.g. some combination of `//@ ignore-none`, `//@ ignore-nvptx` and more[^none-limit].
### Implementation limitation
Unfortunately, since there is currently [no reliable way to determine from metadata whether a given target supports std or not](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/142296), we have to resort to a hack. Bootstrap currently determines whether or not a target supports std by a naive target tuple substring comparison: a target supports std if its target tuple does *not* contain one of `["-none", "nvptx", "switch"]` substrings. This PR simply pulls that hack out into `build_helpers` to avoid reimplementing the same hack in compiletest, and uses that logic to inform `//@ needs-target-std`.
### Auxiliary changes
This PR additionally changes a few run-make tests to use `//@ needs-target-std` over an inconsistent combination of target-based `ignore`s. This should help with rust-lang/rust#139244.
---
r? bootstrap
[^none-limit]: Notably, `target_os = "none"` is **not** a sufficient condition for "target does not support std"
tests: Change ABIs in tests to more future-resilient ones
Eventually we're going to make these tests not work as they are currently written on HEAD, so change them now to get ahead of that.
r? aDotInTheVoid
Remove check_mod_loops query and run the checks per-body instead
This analysis is older than my first rustc contribution I believe. It was never querified. Ideally we'd merge it into the analysis happening within typeck anyway (typeck just uses span_delayed_bug instead of erroring), but I didn't want to do that within this PR that also moves things around and subtly changes diagnostic ordering.
compiler: fn ptrs should hit different lints based on ABI
I was looking closer at the code for linting on ABIs and realized a mistake was probably made during rebase or review. I think that for function pointers in the HIR, the lint that fires should probably depend on the ABI we encountered, e.g. if it's on the newly-deprecated set of ABIs or not. This will be slightly confusing for a little bit, but I think we can do more to reduce that confusion by switching `unsupported_fn_ptr_calling_conventions` to a hard error.
r? ``@RalfJung``
deduplicate the rest of AST walker functions
After this, we can tidy things up and deduplicate the visitor traits themselves too.
Fixesrust-lang/rust#139825, apparently
r? ``@oli-obk``
Note the version and PR of removed features when using it
Fixesrust-lang/rust#141619
I added the diagnostic information. Since all the current version information is present, it prints the version information anyway, as shown in tests/ui. And PR will not print if it is None, we can gradually add the PR links.
Split into two commits for easier review.
r? compiler
cc ``@jyn514`` Since you're on vocation in the review list, I can't r? you.
Stabilize keylocker
This PR stabilizes the feature flag `keylocker_x86` (tracking issue rust-lang/rust#134813).
# Public API
The 2 `x86` target features `kl` and `widekl`, and the associated intrinsics in stdarch.
These target features are very specialized, and are only used to signal the presence of the corresponding CPU instruction. They don't have any nontrivial interaction with the ABI (contrary to something like AVX), and serve the only purpose of enabling 11 stdarch intrinsics, all of which have been implemented and propagated to rustc via a stdarch submodule update.
Also, these were added way back in LLVM12, and as the minimum LLVM required for rustc is LLVM19, we are safe in that front too!
# Associated PRs
- rust-lang/rust#134814
- rust-lang/stdarch#1706
- rust-lang/rust#136831 (stdarch submodule update)
- rust-lang/stdarch#1795 (stabilizing the runtime detection and intrinsics)
- rust-lang/rust#141964 (stdarch submodule update for the stabilization of the runtime detection and intrinsics)
As all of the required tasks have been done (adding the target features to rustc, implementing their runtime detection in std_detect and implementing the associated intrinsics in core_arch), these target features can be stabilized now.
cc ````@rust-lang/lang````
cc ````@rust-lang/libs-api```` for the intrinsics and runtime detection
I don't think anyone else worked on this feature, so no one else to ping, maybe cc ````@Amanieu.```` I will send the reference pr soon.
mir-opt: Do not create storage marks in EarlyOtherwiseBranch
Fixes#141212.
The first commit add `StorageDead` by creating new indirect BB that makes CFG more complicated, but I think it's better to just not create storage marks.
r? mir-opt
We move the vectorcall ABI tests into their own file which is now
only run on x86-64, while replacing them with rust-cold ABI tests
so that aarch64 hosts continue to test an unstable ABI.
A better solution might be cross-compiling or something but
I really don't have time for that right now.
Stabilize `sha512`, `sm3` and `sm4` for x86
This PR stabilizes the feature flag `sha512_sm_x86` (tracking issue rust-lang/rust#126624).
# Public API
The 3 `x86` target features `sha512`, `sm3` and `sm4`, and the associated intrinsics in stdarch.
These target features are very specialized, and are only used to signal the presence of the corresponding CPU instruction. They don't have any nontrivial interaction with the ABI (contrary to something like AVX), and serve the only purpose of enabling 10 stdarch intrinsics, all of which have been implemented and propagated to rustc via a stdarch submodule update.
Also, these were added in LLVM17, and as the minimum LLVM required for rustc is LLVM19, we are safe in that front too!
# Associated PRs
- rust-lang/rust#126704
- rust-lang/stdarch#1592
- rust-lang/stdarch#1790
- rust-lang/rust#140389 (stdarch submodule update)
- rust-lang/stdarch#1796 (stabilizing the runtime detection and intrinsics)
- rust-lang/rust#141964 (stdarch submodule update for the stabilization of the runtime detection and intrinsics)
As all of the required tasks have been done (adding the target features to rustc, implementing their runtime detection in std_detect and implementing the associated intrinsics in core_arch), these target features can be stabilized now.
cc `@rust-lang/lang`
cc `@rust-lang/libs-api` for the intrinsics and runtime detection
I don't think anyone else worked on this feature, so no one else to ping, maybe cc `@Amanieu.` I will send the reference pr soon.
add tests for pattern binding drop order edge cases
This adds tests for rust-lang/rust#142163, rust-lang/rust#142057, and rust-lang/rust#142056. I'm using these tests to help make sure I don't commit breaking changes when implementing match lowering for guard patterns, but I think it makes sense to add them separately. They don't directly have anything to do with guard patterns.
r? `@Nadrieril` or reassign
Add (back) `unsupported_calling_conventions` lint to reject more invalid calling conventions
This adds back the `unsupported_calling_conventions` lint that was removed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129935, in order to start the process of dealing with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137018. Specifically, we are going for the plan laid out [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137018#issuecomment-2672118326):
- thiscall, stdcall, fastcall, cdecl should only be accepted on x86-32
- vectorcall should only be accepted on x86-32 and x86-64
The difference to the status quo is that:
- We stop accepting stdcall, fastcall on targets that are windows && non-x86-32 (we already don't accept these on targets that are non-windows && non-x86-32)
- We stop accepting cdecl on targets that are non-x86-32
- (There is no difference for thiscall, this was already a hard error on non-x86-32)
- We stop accepting vectorcall on targets that are windows && non-x86-*
Vectorcall is an unstable ABI so we can just make this a hard error immediately. The others are stable, so we emit the `unsupported_calling_conventions` forward-compat lint. I set up the lint to show up in dependencies via cargo's future-compat report immediately, but we could also make it show up just for the local crate first if that is preferred.
try-job: i686-msvc-1
try-job: x86_64-msvc-1
try-job: test-various
`tests/ui`: A New Order [7/N]
> [!NOTE]
>
> Intermediate commits are intended to help review, but will be squashed prior to merge.
Some `tests/ui/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/`. Part of rust-lang/rust#133895.
`tests/ui`: A New Order [6/N]
> [!NOTE]
>
> Intermediate commits are intended to help review, but will be squashed prior to merge.
Some `tests/ui/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/`. Part of rust-lang/rust#133895.
r? `````@jieyouxu`````
auxiliary tag means some changes in realted auxiliary file for test
In PR 90877 T-lang decided not to remove `intrinsics::pref_align_of`.
However, the intrinsic and its supporting code
1. is a nightly feature, so can be removed at compiler/libs discretion
2. requires considerable effort in the compiler to support, as it
necessarily complicates every single site reasoning about alignment
3. has been justified based on relevance to codegen, but it is only a
requirement for C++ (not C, not Rust) stack frame layout for AIX,
in ways Rust would not consider even with increased C++ interop
4. is only used by rustc to overalign some globals, not correctness
5. can be adequately replaced by other rules for globals, as it mostly
affects alignments for a few types under 16 bytes of alignment
6. has only one clear benefactor: automating C -> Rust translation
for GNU extensions like `__alignof`
7. such code was likely intended to be `alignof` or `_Alignof`,
because the GNU extension is a "false friend" of the C keyword,
which makes the choice to support such a mapping very questionable
8. makes it easy to do incorrect codegen in the compiler by its mere
presence as usual Rust rules of alignment (e.g. `size == align * N`)
do not hold with preferred alignment
The implementation is clearly damaging the code quality of the compiler.
Thus it is within the compiler team's purview to simply rip it out.
If T-lang wishes to have this intrinsic restored for c2rust's benefit,
it would have to use a radically different implementation that somehow
does not cause internal incorrectness.
Until then, remove the intrinsic and its supporting code, as one tool
and an ill-considered GCC extension cannot justify risking correctness.
Because we touch a fair amount of the compiler to change this at all,
and unfortunately the duplication of AbiAndPrefAlign is deep-rooted,
we keep an "AbiAlign" type which we can wean code off later.
const-eval error: always say in which item the error occurred
I don't see why "is this generic" should make a difference. It may be reasonable to key this on whether the error occurs in a `const fn` that was invoked by a const (making it non-obvious which constant it is) vs inside the body of the const.
r? `@oli-obk`
