There is a dead code in libsyntax/parser/parse.rs, when parsing structs.
Two functions are involved:
* [parse_item_struct](cd9c9f048f/src/libsyntax/parse/parser.rs (L4691))
* [parse_tuple_struct_body](cd9c9f048f/src/libsyntax/parse/parser.rs (L4769))
The problem is that both functions handle the case with unit structs. But because
`parse_tuple_struct_body` is called from `parse_item_struct`, it never faces
this case.
This PR removes unit struct case from `parse_tuple_struct_body` function. I tested with `make -j8 check-statge1`.
Both `parse_tuple_struct_body` and `parse_item_struct` handled the case
of unit like struct. The redundancy is removed,
`parse_tuple_struct_body` now handles only real tuple structs.
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 1212][rfc] which tweaks the behavior of
the `str::lines` and `BufRead::lines` iterators. Both iterators now account for
`\r\n` sequences in addition to `\n`, allowing for less surprising behavior
across platforms (especially in the `BufRead` case). Splitting *only* on the
`\n` character can still be achieved with `split('\n')` in both cases.
The `str::lines_any` function is also now deprecated as `str::lines` is a
drop-in replacement for it.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1212-line-endings.mdCloses#28032
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 1212][rfc] which tweaks the behavior of
the `str::lines` and `BufRead::lines` iterators. Both iterators now account for
`\r\n` sequences in addition to `\n`, allowing for less surprising behavior
across platforms (especially in the `BufRead` case). Splitting *only* on the
`\n` character can still be achieved with `split('\n')` in both cases.
The `str::lines_any` function is also now deprecated as `str::lines` is a
drop-in replacement for it.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1212-line-endings.mdCloses#28032
`LocalSource` indicated wether a let binding originated from for-loop desugaring to enable specialized error messages, but for-loop expansion has changed and this is now achieved through `MatchSource::ForLoopDesugar`.
Macro desugaring of `in PLACE { BLOCK }` into "simpler" expressions following the in-development "Placer" protocol.
Includes Placer API that one can override to integrate support for `in` into one's own type. (See [RFC 809].)
[RFC 809]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0809-box-and-in-for-stdlib.md
Part of #22181
Replaced PR #26180.
Turns on the `in PLACE { BLOCK }` syntax, while leaving in support for the old `box (PLACE) EXPR` syntax (since we need to support that at least until we have a snapshot with support for `in PLACE { BLOCK }`.
(Note that we are not 100% committed to the `in PLACE { BLOCK }` syntax. In particular I still want to play around with some other alternatives. Still, I want to get the fundamental framework for the protocol landed so we can play with implementing it for non `Box` types.)
----
Also, this PR leaves out support for desugaring-based `box EXPR`. We will hopefully land that in the future, but for the short term there are type-inference issues injected by that change that we want to resolve separately.
Inspired by the now-mysteriously-closed https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/26782.
This PR introduces better error messages when unicode escapes have invalid format (e.g. `\uFFFF`). It also makes rustc always tell the user that escape may not be used in byte-strings and bytes and fixes some spans to not include unecessary characters and include escape backslash in some others.
This improves diagnostic messages when \u escape is used incorrectly and { is
missing. Instead of saying “unknown character escape: u”, it will now report
that unicode escape sequence is incomplete and suggest what the correct syntax
is.
