Specialization is unsound
As discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/31844#issuecomment-617013949, it might be a good idea to warn users of specialization that the feature they are using is unsound.
I also expanded the "incomplete feature" warning to link the user to the tracking issue.
- Suggest borrowing expression if it would allow cast to work.
- Suggest using `<Type>::from(<expr>)` when appropriate.
- Minor tweak to `;` typo suggestion.
Partily address #47136.
mir: adjust conditional in recursion limit check
Fixes#67552.
This PR adjusts the condition used in the recursion limit check of
the monomorphization collector, from `>` to `>=`.
In #67552, the test case had infinite indirect recursion, repeating a
handful of functions (from the perspective of the monomorphization
collector): `rec` -> `identity` -> `Iterator::count` -> `Iterator::fold`
-> `Iterator::next` -> `rec`.
During this process, `resolve_associated_item` was invoked for
`Iterator::fold` (during the construction of an `Instance`), and
ICE'd due to substitutions needing inference. However, previous
iterations of this recursion would have called this function for
`Iterator::fold` - and did! - and succeeded in doing so (trivially
checkable from debug logging, `()` is present where `_` is in the substs
of the failing execution).
The expected outcome of this test case would be a recursion limit error
(which is present when the `identity` fn indirection is removed), and
the recursion depth of `rec` is increasing (other functions finish
collecting their neighbours and thus have their recursion depths reset).
When the ICE occurs, the recursion depth of `rec` is 256 (which matches
the recursion limit), which suggests perhaps that a different part of
the compiler is using a `>=` comparison and returning a different result
on this recursion rather than what it returned in every previous
recursion, thus stopping the monomorphization collector from reporting
an error on the next recursion, where `recursion_depth_of_rec > 256`
would have been true.
With grep and some educated guesses, we can determine that
the recursion limit check at line 818 in
`src/librustc_trait_selection/traits/project.rs` is the other check that
is using a different comparison. Modifying either comparison to be `>` or
`>=` respectively will fix the error, but changing the monomorphization
collector produces the nicer error.
Suggest using std::mem::drop function instead of explicit destructor call
I would prefer to give a better suggestion that includes code example, but I'm currently stuck on getting the correct span for that.
Closes#72322.
This commit introduces a `Limit` type which is used to ensure that all
comparisons against limits within the compiler are consistent (which can
result in ICEs if they aren't).
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
Moving more build-pass tests to check-pass
One or two tests became build-pass without the FIXME because they really
needed build-pass (were failing without it).
Helps with #62277
---
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/rust-lang/rust/71340)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
During development, a function could have a return type set that is a
bare trait object by accident. We already suggest using either a boxed
trait object or `impl Trait` if the return paths will allow it. We now
do so too when there are *no* return paths or they all resolve to `!`.
We still don't handle cases where the trait object is *not* the entirety
of the return type gracefully.
Use `PredicateObligation`s instead of `Predicate`s
Keep more information about trait binding failures. Use more specific spans by pointing at bindings that introduce obligations.
Subset of #69709.
r? @eddyb
non-exhastive diagnostic: add note re. scrutinee type
This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/67259 by adding a note:
```
= note: the matched value is of type &[i32]
```
to non-exhaustive pattern matching errors.
r? @varkor @estebank
They used to be covered by `optin_builtin_traits` but negative impls
are now applicable to all traits, not just auto traits.
This also adds docs in the unstable book for the current state of auto traits.
Store idents for `DefPathData` into crate metadata
Previously, we threw away the `Span` associated with a definition's
identifier when we encoded crate metadata, causing us to lose location
and hygiene information.
We now store the identifier's `Span` in a side table, which gets encoded
into the crate metadata. When we decode items from the metadata, we
combine the name and span back into an `Ident`.
This improves the output of several tests, which previously had messages
suppressed due to dummy spans.
This is a prerequisite for #68686, since throwing away a `Span` means
that we lose hygiene information.
Tweak output for invalid negative impl errors
Follow up to #69722. Tweak negative impl errors emitted in the HIR:
```
error[E0192]: invalid negative impl
--> $DIR/E0192.rs:9:6
|
LL | impl !Trait for Foo { }
| ^^^^^^
|
= note: negative impls are only allowed for auto traits, like `Send` and `Sync`
```
Increase verbosity when suggesting subtle code changes
Do not suggest changes that are actually quite small inline, to minimize the likelihood of confusion.
Fix#69243.
Previously, we threw away the `Span` associated with a definition's
identifier when we encoded crate metadata, causing us to lose location
and hygiene information.
We now store the identifier's `Span` in the crate metadata.
When we decode items from the metadata, we combine
the name and span back into an `Ident`.
This improves the output of several tests, which previously had messages
suppressed due to dummy spans.
This is a prerequisite for #68686, since throwing away a `Span` means
that we lose hygiene information.
